Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-ksm4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T12:56:38.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sponges from the Reef Trail Member of the Upper Guadalupian (Permian) Bell Canyon Formation, Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, S-389 Eyring Science Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4604, and Guadalupe Mountains National Park, HC 60, Box 400, Salt Flat, Texas 79847-9400,
Gorden L. Bell Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, S-389 Eyring Science Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4604, and Guadalupe Mountains National Park, HC 60, Box 400, Salt Flat, Texas 79847-9400,

Abstract

An extensive faunule of silicified calcareous sponges has been recovered from the Upper Guadalupian Reef Trail Member of the Bell Canyon Formation, from the Patterson Hills, in the southwestern part of the Guadalupe Mountains National Park in western Texas. This is the youngest silicified faunule of Permian sponges known from that area, and possibly the youngest from North America. It includes the hypercalcified ceractinomorph “sphinctozoans” Amblysiphonella sp., Tristratocoelia rhythmica Senowbari-Daryan and Rigby, 1988, Colospongiella permiana n. gen. and sp., Exaulipora permica (Senowbari-Daryan, 1990), Parauvanella minima Senowbari-Daryan, 1990, and the “sphinctozoans” Girtyocoelia beedei (Girty, 1909), Sollasia ostiolata Steinmann, 1882, Sollasiella reticulata n. gen. and sp., Ramosothalamiella divaricata n. gen. and sp., and Spica texana n. sp. Also present are Guadalupia zitteliana Girty, 1909, Guadalupia minuta n. sp., Lemonea cylindrica (Girty, 1909), and Lemonea micra Rigby, Senowbari-Daryan, and Liu, 1998. Aspiculate calcareous sponges include the “inozoids” Preperonidella rigbyi (Senowbari-Daryan, 1991), ?Djemelia sp., Radiotrabeculopora virga n. sp., Daharella ramosa Rigby and Senowbari-Daryan, 1996, Daharella pattersonia n. sp., Daharella crassa n. sp., and Newellospongia perforata n. gen. and sp. The problematic Lercaritubus problematicus Flügel et al., 1990 is tentatively included with the “inozoids.”

The new siliceous protomonaxonid demosponge Monaxoradiata lamina n. gen. and sp., is a moderately common sponge from the member. The new siliceous lithistid demosponges Chiastocolumnia cylindrica n. gen. and sp., Dactylites obconica n. sp., and Dactylites magna n. sp., the large hexactinellid sponge Toomeyospongia gigantia Rigby and Bell, 2005, and the new lyssacinosid Flexuospiculata hexactina n. gen. and sp., along with isolated large hexactines, are associated with these silicified calcareous sponges from the Reef Trail Member. Toomeyospongia gigantia Rigby and Bell, 2005, described earlier, is the only large complete hexactinellid sponge that is part of the Reef Trail Member assemblage.

The problematical Pulsatospongia obconica n. gen. and sp., whose taxonomic position is uncertain, along with an encrusting possible inozoid sponge, and spicule-lined ?burrows are also described as part of the fossil assemblage.

Significant faunal similarity occurs between this assemblage and those from several areas within the Paleo-Tethys Sea, especially with those from the Djebel Tebaga area of Tunisia. This suggests significant faunal exchange between the two regions, possibly resulting from strong trans-Panthalassan equatorial currents and a significant anti-cyclonic gyre within the Paleo-Tethys basin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleotti, G., Dieci, G., and Russo, F. 1986. Éponges permiennes de la Vallée de Sosio (Sicile). Révision systematique des sphinctozaires. Annales de Paléontologie, 73:211246.Google Scholar
Bechstädt, T., and Brandner, R. 1970. Das Anis zwischen St. Vigil und dem Hohlensteintal (Prager- und Olanger Dolomiten, Sudtirol). Festband Geologische Institut. 300 Jahr-Freier Universitet Innsbruch, p. 9103.Google Scholar
Cossman, M. 1909. Rectification de nomenclature. Revue Critique de Paléozoologie, 13:6768.Google Scholar
Dahlbom, A. G. 1854. Hymenoptera Europaea Praecipue Borealia. Vol. 2. Berlin, p. ixv, 1–9.Google Scholar
de Gregorio, A. 1930. Sul Permiano di Sicilia (Fossili del calcare con Fusulina di Palazzo Adriano). Annales de Geologie et de Paléontologie (Palermo), 55, 70 p., 21 pls. Google Scholar
de Laubenfels, M. W. 1955. Porifera, p. E21E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. E. Archaeocyatha and Porifera. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Deng, Zhan-Qiu. 1981. Upper Permian sponges from Laibin of Quangxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 20:418427. (In Chinese with English summary) Google Scholar
Deng, Zhan-Qiu. 1982. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sponges from Southwest China, p. 245266. In Stratigraphy and Palaeontology in W. Sichuan and E. Xizang China, Pt. 2, Sichuan Renmin Chuban She. Chengdu. (In Chinese with English summary) Google Scholar
Fagerstrom, J. A. 1987. The Evolution of Reef Communities. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 628 p.Google Scholar
Jiasong, Fan, Rigby, J. K., and Wei, Zhang. 1991. “Hydrozoa” from Middle and Upper Permian reefs of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 65:4568.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. 1923. Une nouveau serpulien d'eau saumâtre, Merciella n. g., enigmatica, n. sp. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 47: 424430.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region: The siliceous sponges. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 120, Article 1, 160 p.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1983. Pharetronida: Inozoa and Sphinctozoa, p. 5559. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Sponges and Spongiomorphs; Notes for a Short Course. University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology 7.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1995. Some new genera of Paleozoic calcareous sponges. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, n.s., Number 6, 9 p.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M., and Rigby, J. K. 2004. Hypercalcified sponges, p. 585758. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. E. Porifera (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Flügel, E., and Reinhardt, J. 1989. Uppermost Permian reefs in Skyros (Greece) and Sichuan (China): Implications for the Late Permian extinction event. Palaios, 4:502518.Google Scholar
Flügel, E., Kochansky-Devide, V., and Ramov, S. A. 1984. A Middle Permian calcisponge/algal/cement reef: Straza near Bled, Slovenia. Facies, 10:179256.Google Scholar
Flügel, E., Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Di Stefano, P. 1990. Lercaritubus problematicus n. gen., n. sp., a lower Permian reef organism from western Sicily. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 29:361366.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1908. On some new and old species of Carboniferous fossils. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 34:281303.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1909 [1908]. The Guadalupian Fauna. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 58, 651 p.Google Scholar
Hurcewicz, H., and Czarniecki, S. 1986. Lyssakidae sponges from the Carboniferous limestone and the Culm of southern Poland and their environmental differentiation. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 55:333354.Google Scholar
Inai, Y. 1936. Discosiphonella, a new ally of Amblysiphonella . Proceedings of the Imperial Academy of Japan, 12:169171.Google Scholar
King, P. B. 1948. Geology of the southern Guadalupe Mountains, Texas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 215, 183 p.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1933. A Pennsylvanian sponge fauna from Wise County, Texas. The University of Texas Bulletin, 3201:7585.Google Scholar
King, R. H. 1943. New Carboniferous and Permian sponges. State Geological Survey of Kansas Bulletin, 47:136.Google Scholar
Kügel, H. W. 1987. Sphinctozoen aus den Auernig-Schichten des Nassfeldes (Oberkarbon, Karnische Alpen, Österreiche). Facies, 16:143156, pls. 33–35. Google Scholar
Lambert, L. L., Wardlaw, B. R., Nestell, M. K., and Nestell, G. P. 2002. Latest Guadalupian (Middle Permian) conodonts and foraminifers from West Texas. Micropaleontology, 48:343364.Google Scholar
Laube, G. C. 1865. Die Fauna der Schichten von St. Cassian. Ein beitrag zur Palaontologie der alpinen Trias, I Abtheilung. Spongitarien, Corallen, Echiniden und Crinoiden. Denkschriften der Kaiserlishen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klass, 24:223296, 10 pls. Google Scholar
Lévi, C. L. 1953. Sur une nouvelle classification des Démosponges. Académie des Sciences (Paris), Comptes Rendus des Séances, 236:853855.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. L. 1956. Étude de Halisarca de Roschoff. Embryologie et systématique des Démosponges. Archives de Zoologie Expérimental et Générale, 93:1181.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H. 1914. Faune des calcaires à Productus de l'Indochine, 2. Mémoir du Service Géologique du Indochine, 3:159.Google Scholar
Mastandrea, A., and Russo, F. 1995. Microstructure and diagenesis of calcified demosponges from the Upper Triassic of Northeastern Dolomites (Italy). Journal of Paleontology, 69:416431.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Furnish, W. M. 1940. Permian ammonoids of the Guadalupe Mountain region and adjacent areas. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 26, 242 p.Google Scholar
Myagkova, E. I. 1955. K kharakteristike klassa Aphrosalpingoida Miagkova, 1955 [On the characteristics of the Class Aphrosalpingoida, Miagkova, 1955]. Akademiya Nauk SSSR Doklady, 104:478481.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., Rigby, J. K., Fischer, A. G., Whiteman, A. J., Hickox, J. E., and Bradley, J. S. 1953. The Permian Reef Complex of the Guadalupe Mountains, Texas and New Mexico–A Study in Paleoecology. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 236 p.Google Scholar
Nutzubidze, K. SH. 1964. [Liassic sponges of the Dzirulbskogho Massif.] Akademy of Sciences, Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic. Trudy Geologischeskaya Instituta, Tbilisi. Seriya Geologischeskaya, 14(19): 536. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Parona, C. F. 1933. Le spugne della fauna permiana di Palazzo Adriano (Bacino del Sosio) in Sicilia. Memoire della Società Geologica Italiana, 1:158.Google Scholar
Pickett, J. 1982. Vaceletia progenitor, the first Tertiary sphinctozoan (Porifera). Alcheringa, 6:241–147.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1894. Palaeospongiologie, Erster oder allgemeiner Theil, und Zweiter Theil, erste Hälfte. Palaeontographica, 41:233346.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1895. Palaeospongiologie. Zweiter Theil. Fortsetzung. Spongien des Silurs. Palaeontographica, 43:223272.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1938. Über einige Kalkschwämme aus der Trias der peruanischen Kordillere, nebst einem Anhang über Stellispongia und ihre Arten. Palaeontologische Zeitschrift, 20:177214.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. W. 1988. Uppermost Permian reefs and Permo–Triassic sedimentary facies from the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin, China. Facies, 18:231288.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1984. Permian sponges from western Venezuela. Journal of Paleontology, 58:14361462.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Late Devonian sponges of Western Australia. Geological Survey of Western Australia, Report 18, 59 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1987. Phylum Porifera, p. 116139. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Bell, Gorden L. Jr. 2005. A new hexactinellid sponge from the Reef Trail Member of the Upper Guadalupian Bell Canyon Formation, Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Journal of Paleontology, 79:200204.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Middle Silurian Ludlovian and Wenlockian sponges from Baillie-Hamilton and Cornwallis Islands, Arctic Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 391, 69 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Pollard-Bryant, T. L. 1979. Fossil sponges of the Mississippian Fort Payne Chert in northeastern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 53:10051012.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1996. Upper Permian inozoid, demosponge and hexactinellid sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, n.s., no. 7, 130 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Jiasong, Fan, and Nairen, Han. 1995. Upper Permian silicified sponges from central Guangxi and western Hubei, South China. Journal of Paleontology, 69:211232.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Jiasong, Fan, and Wei, Zhang. 1989. Inozoan calcareous Porifera from the Permian reefs of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 63:778800.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Horrocks, R. D., and Cys, J. 1982. A new hexactinellid brachiosponge from the Upper Permian of West Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 56:315323.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Liu, Huaibao. 1998. Sponges of the Permian Upper Capitan Limestone, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 43:19117.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzuge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, p. iiv, 1–88.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1910. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland, I Teil, Tetraxonia, Monaxonia und Silicea incert. sedis. Palaeontographica, supplement 5(1):1175.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Über den Bau und das System der Hexactinelliden. Abhandlungen der Königlichen preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Physikalisch-Mathematische Classe), 1886:197.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., and McKerrow, W. S. 1990. Revised world maps and introduction, p. 121, 22 figs. In McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R. (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society Memoir Series, 12. Geological Society of London.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1990. Die systematische Stellung der thalamiden Schwämme und ihre Bedeutung in der Erdgeschichte. Münchener geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Reihe A, Geologie und Paläontologie, 21, 326 p.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1991. Nomenklatorische Notiz unter Berüksichtigung des Homonymiegesetzes. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 65: 405.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Di Stefano, P. 1988. Microfacies and sphinctozoan assemblage of some Lower Permian breccias from Lercara Formation (western Sicily). Revista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 94:334.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Ingavat-Helmcke, R. 1993. Upper Permian sponges from Phrae province (northern Thailand). International Symposium on Biostratigraphy of Mainland Southeast Asia: Facies and Paleontology. Bangkok, p. 439451.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Ingavat-Helmcke, R. 1994. Sponge assemblage of some Upper Permian reef limestones from Phrae Province (northern Thailand). Geologija, 36:359.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Rigby, J. K. 1988. Upper Permian segmented sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. Facies, 19:171250.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Rigby, J. K. 1991. Three additional thalamid sponges from the Upper Permian reefs of Djebel Tebaga (Tunisia). Journal of Paleontology, 65:623629.Google Scholar
Senowbari-Daryan, B., and Rigby, J. K. 1996. First report of Lercaritubus in North America, from the Permian Capitan Limestone, Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 70:2226.Google Scholar
Smyth, L. B. 1928. Salpingium palinorsum: A new Carboniferous coral. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, n.s., 19(5):3942.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 451. In Baynes, T. S. (ed.), A Dictionary of Arts Sciences and General Literature. Encyclopaedia Brittanica (ninth edition). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1934. Catalogue of the fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History), Pt. IV, Ammonoidea of the Trias. London, 521 p.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1882. Pharetronen-Studien. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, 2:613630.Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G. 1977a. Paléontologie des Invertébrés, p. 255299. In Termier, H. G., Termier, G., and Vachard, D. (eds.), Monographic Paléontologique des affleurements Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud Tunisien). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 56(1–3), 109 p. Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G. 1977b. Contributions à l'étude des Spongiaires permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Extrème Sud Tunisien). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, series 6, 5:613630.Google Scholar
Termier, H. G., Termier, G., and Vachard, D. 1977. Monographic Paléontologique des affleurements Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud Tunisien). Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, 56(1–3), 109 p.Google Scholar
Toomey, D. F. 1979. Role of archaeolithophyllid algae within a Late Carboniferous algal-sponge community, southwestern United States. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, 3(2):843853.Google Scholar
Van de Graaff, W. J. E. 1969. Carboniferous Sphinctozoa from the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, 42: 239257.Google Scholar
Verrill, A. E. 1907. Porifera of the Bermuda Islands. Transactions of the Academy of Arts and Sciences, New Haven, Connecticut, 12:330344.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, Robert. 1887. On the systematic position and classification of sponges. Zoological Society of London Proceedings, 1886, p. 558662.Google Scholar
von Lendenfeld, Robert. 1888. Descriptive Catalogue of the Sponges in the Australian Museum. Sydney. The Australian Museum. Taylor and Francis, London, 260 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. IV, no. 6. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67(6):261364.Google Scholar
Weidlich, O. 1992. Rekonstruktion einer Karbonatplattform in Oberperm: Palökologie, mikrofazies und biostratigraphie von autochthonen und allochthonen Karbonaten, Sultanat Oman. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Erlangen, 199 p.Google Scholar
Weidlich, O., and Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1996. Late Permian “sphinctozoans” from reefal blocks of the Ba'id area, Oman Mountains. Journal of Paleontology, 70:2746.Google Scholar
Wilde, G. L., Rudine, S. F., and Lambert, L. L. 1999. Formal designation: Reef Trail Member, Bell Canyon Formation, and its significance for recognition of the Guadalupian–Lopingian boundary, p. 6183. In Sailer, A. H., Harris, P. M., Kirkland, B. L., and Mazzulo, S. J. (eds.), Geologic Framework of the Capitan Reef. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), Special Publication, 65, 244 p. Google Scholar
Wood, R. 1991. Non-spicular biomineralization in calcified demosponges, p. 322340. In Reitner, J. and Keupp, H. (eds.), Fossil and Recent Sponges. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wu, Ya Sheng. 1991. Organisms and Communities of Permian Reef of Xiangbo, China. International Academic Publishers, Beijing, 192 p.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei. 1983. Study of the Upper Permian Changxing Formation from Lichuan area, West Hubei, China, p. 111. In A Collection of Theses for Master's Degree (1981). Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica, Beijing.Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1962. Incertae sedis, class Sphinctozoa, p. 98103. In Sokolov, B. S. (ed.), Fundamentals of Paleontology, II. Porifera, Archaeocyatha, Coelenterata, Vermes. (Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, 1971) Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. M., Eshel, G., McAllister Rees, P., Rothfus, T. A., Rowley, D. B., and Sunderlin, D. 2003. Tracing the tropics across land and sea: Permian to present. Lethaia, 36:227254.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1877. Studien über fossile Spongien, 1 Abteilung, Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Königlisch-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse, 13(1), 63 p.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1878. Studien über fossile Spongien, Dritte Abteilung, Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongiae. Abhandlungen der Königlisch-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse, 2:91138.Google Scholar