Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.327 Render date: 2021-10-15T21:18:30.785Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Revision of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Agnostus acadicus Hartt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Richard A. Robison*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045

Abstract

Agnostus acadicus Hartt (in Dawson, 1868) was the first agnostoid trilobite to be described from Middle Cambrian strata in North America. It was later designated the type species of Acadagnostus Kobayashi, 1939. The original description of A. acadicus was based on two specimens, a cephalon and a pygidium, which are illustrated for the first time with photographs. These are interpreted to represent separate species, each belonging to a different genus. The holotype cephalon is reassigned as Peronopsis acadica, which is judged to be a subjective senior synonym of Agnostus fallax Linnarsson, 1869, and several other species-group taxa. Consequently, Acadagnostus is suppressed as a subjective junior synonym of Peronopsis. Agnostus fallax is the type species of Axagnostus Laurie, 1990, which also is suppressed as a subjective junior synonym of Peronopsis. The pygidium on which the original description of A. acadicus was based is reassigned to Hypagnostus parvifrons (Linnarsson, 1869).

Peronopsis acadica, as emended, is a common, cosmopolitan agnostoid in open-marine lithofacies. It has an observed stratigraphic range from the Ptychagnostus praecurrens Interval-zone to the Ptychagnostus punctuosus Interval-zone.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyrich, E. 1845. Ueber einige böhmische Trilobiten. Reimer, Berlin, 47 p.Google Scholar
Bognibova, R. T., Koptev, I. I., Mikhailova, L. M., Poletaeva, O. K., Romanenko, E. V., Romanenko, M. F., Semashko, A. K., Tomashpolskaya, V. D., Fedyanina, E. S., and Chernysheva, N. E. 1971. Trilobites of Amginsk age of the Altai-Sayan region, p. 82263. In Chernysheva, N. E. (ed.), The Amginsk Stage in the Altai-Sayan Region. Trudy sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofiziki i mineralnogo Syrya, 111 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1974. Catalogue of Type Invertebrate Fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada, Volume 5. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 396 p.Google Scholar
Brøgger, W. C. 1878. Om Paradoxidesskifrene ved Krekling. Nyt Magazin Naturvidenskaberne, 24:1888.Google Scholar
Chapman, F. 1929. On some trilobites and brachiopods from the Mount Isa district, N. W. Queensland. Royal Society of Victoria, Proceedings, 41:206216.Google Scholar
Chernysheva, N. E. (ed.). 1960. Principles of Paleontology; Arthropoda—Trilobita and Crustacea. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, 515 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Chernysheva, N. E. (ed.). 1961. Stratigraphy of the Cambrian of the Aldan anteclise and the paleontological basis for distinguishing the Amgan Stage. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-issledovatelskogo Geologicheskogo Instituta, 49:1347[in Russian].Google Scholar
Cobbold, E. S. 1911. Trilobites of the Paradoxides beds of Comley (Shropshire); with notes on some of the associated Brachiopoda by Charles Alfred Matley. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society (London), 67:282311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. W. 1868. Acadian Geology, second edition. MacMillan and Company, London, 694 p.Google Scholar
Deiss, C. 1939. Cambrian Stratigraphy and Trilobites of Northwestern Montana. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 18, 135 p.Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Lomovitskaya, M. P., Poletaeva, O. K., and Srvov, A. G. 1955. Trilobites, p. 102145. In Khalfin, L. L. (ed.), Atlas of Leading Forms of Fossil Fauna and Flora of Western Siberia, Volume 1. Geoltekhizdat, Leningrad[in Russian].Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., and Savttsky, V. E. 1969. Stratigraphy and biofacies of the Cambrian of the Siberian platform, western Prianabar. Trudy sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofiziki i mineralnogo Syrya, 43:1408[in Russian].Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Shabanov, Y. Y., Pegel, T. V., Savttsky, V. E., Suchov, S. S., and Chernysheva, N. E. 1982. Maya Stage of the type locality (Middle Cambrian of Siberian platform). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Ministerstvo Geologii, Mezhvedomstvennyi Stratigraficheskii Komitet SSSR, Trudy, 8:1146[in Russian).Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H., and Simandl, G. J. 1993. New Middle Cambrian fossil and geological data from the Brussilof magnesite mine area, southeastern British Columbia. Current Research, Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 93-lA:183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyffe, L. R., and Pickerill, R. K. 1993. Geochemistry of Upper Cambrian—Lower Ordovician black shale along a northeastern Appalachian transect. Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 105:897910.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil Cid, M. D. 1981. Los trilobites agnóstidos del Cámbrico Inferior y Medio de España. Boletin Geológico y Minero, 92(2):2136.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., and Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils: Invertebrates, Volume 2. A. G. Seiler & Company, New York, 909 p.Google Scholar
Grönwall, K. A. 1902. Bornholms Paradoxideslag og deres fauna. Danmarks geologiske Undersøgelse, IIRaekke, 13, 230 p.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J., and 17 others. 1959. Arthropoda 1. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 560 p.Google Scholar
Hawle, I., and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen der königliche böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 5:1176.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1952. Early Middle Cambrian fauna from Rogaland, SW Norway. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 30:1332.Google Scholar
Hicks, H. 1872. On some undescribed fossils from the Menevian Group. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 28:173185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D., Playford, G., and Woods, J. T. 1971. Cambrian Fossils of Queensland. Queensland Palaeontological Society, 32 p.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1925. The faunas of the Cambrian Paradoxides beds at Manuels, Newfoundland. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 11(43):1140.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, R. D. 1952. The stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of the Cambrian sedimentary rocks of Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 263, 124 p.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, R. D. 1962. Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of southeastern Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 88, 156 p.Google Scholar
Illing, V. C. 1916. The Paradoxidian fauna of a part of the Stockingford Shales. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 71:386450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivshin, N. K. 1953. Middle Cambrian trilobites from Kazakhstan, Part I. Institute of Geological Sciences, Alma-Ata, 226 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, 61:380400.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen; Palaeontology, Part III, Cambrian faunas of South Chosen with special study of the Cambrian trilobite genera and families. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section 2, 4(2):49344.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1939. On the agnostids (Part I). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section 2, 5(5):69198.Google Scholar
Lake, P. 1906. A Monograph of the British Cambrian Trilobites, Part I. Palaeontographical Society, London, p. 128.Google Scholar
Laurie, J. R. 1990. On the Middle Cambrian agnostoid species Agnostus fallax Linnarsson 1869. Alcheringa, 14:317324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1869. Om Vestergötlands Cambriska och Siluriska aflagringar. Kongelig Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 8(2):189.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1877. Om faunan i lagren med Paradoxides ölandicus. Geologiska Föreningens i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 3(12):124. [Reprinted, 1877, Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, 24 p.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1879. Om faunan i kalken med Conocoryphe exsulans (“Coronatuskalken”). Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Series C, 35:131.Google Scholar
Linnarsson, J. G. O. 1883 [dated 1882]. De undre Paradoxideslagren vid Andrarum. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Series C, 54:148.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1886 [dated 1885]. Illustrations of the fauna of the St. John group continued, No. III; descriptions of new genera and species (including a description of a new species of Solenopleura by J. F. Whiteaves). Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 3(4):2984.Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1896. Faunas of the Paradoxides beds in eastern North America, No. 1. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 15:192247.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1873. Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of lists of fossils, with remarks on the ages of the rocks in which they were found. U.S. Geological Survey of the Territories, 6th Annual Report:429518.Google Scholar
Morris, S. F. 1988. A review of British trilobites, including a synoptic revision of Salter's monograph. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, London, 140(574):1316.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of north-western Queensland. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia, Bulletin 74, Volume 1, 404 p., Volume 2, 167 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1979. Middle Cambrian agnostids: systematics and biostratigraphy. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia, Bulletin 172, Volume 1, 188 p., Volume 2, 67 Pls.Google Scholar
Orlowski, S. 1964. Middle Cambrian and its fauna in the eastern part of the Holy Cross Mts. Studia Geologica Polonica, 16:194.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1954. An appraisal of the Great Basin Middle Cambrian trilobites described before 1900. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 264-D:5586.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R., DeMis, W. D., Muehlberger, W. R., and Robison, R. A. 1984. Geological implications of Middle Cambrian boulders from the Haymond Formation (Pennsylvanian) in the Marathon basin, west Texas. Geology, 12:9194.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1948. Middle Cambrian trilobites from the conglomerates of Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 22:315339.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1967. Lower and Middle Cambrian trilobite faunas from the Taconic sequence of New York. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 152(4):1111.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1964. Late Middle Cambrian faunas from western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 38:510566.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1975. Species diversity among agnostoid trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 4:219226.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1982. Some Middle Cambrian agnostoid trilobites from western North America. Journal of Paleontology, 56:132160.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1984. Cambrian Agnostida of North America and Greenland; Part I, Ptychagnostidae. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 109, 59 p.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1988. Trilobites of the Holm Dal Formation (late Middle Cambrian), central North Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland, Geoscience, 20:23103.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1994. Agnostoid trilobites from the Henson Gletscher and Kap Stanton Formations (Middle Cambrian), central North Greenland. Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse, Bulletin, 169:2577.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A Monograph of the British Trilobites. Palaeontographical Society, London, p. 180.Google Scholar
Samson, S., Palmer, A. R., Robison, R. A., and Secor, D. T. 1990. Biogeographical significance of Cambrian trilobites from the Carolina slate belt. Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 102:14591470.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savitsky, V. E. (ed.). 1976. Elanian and Kuonamian faciostratotypes of the lower boundary of the Middle Cambrian in Siberia. Trudy sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofiziki i mineralnogo Syrya, 211:1167[in Russian].Google Scholar
Savitsky, V. E., Evtushenko, V. M., Egorova, L. I., Kontorovich, A. E., and Shabanov, Yu. Ya. 1972. Cambrian of the Siberian platform (Judomian-Olenetsky type section, Kuonamsky complex deposits). Trudy sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofiziki i mineralnogo Syrya, 130:1200[in Russian].Google Scholar
Sdzuy, K. 1961. Trilobiten, p. 499594. In Lotze, F. and Sdzuy, K., Das Kambrium Spaniens. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz, 7.Google Scholar
Shah, S. K., and Sudan, C. S. 1987. Agnostid fauna from the Middle Cambrian of Kashmir. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 30:4860.Google Scholar
Shergold, J.H., Laurie, J. R., and Xiaowen, Sun. 1990. Classification and review of the trilobite order Agnostida Salter, 1864: an Australian perspective. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia, Report 296, 93 p.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, R. R. 1944. Index Fossils of North America. John Wiley & Sons, London, 837 p.Google Scholar
Solovjev, I. A., and Grikurov, G. E. 1979. New facts on the distribution of Cambrian trilobites in the Argentina and Shackleton mountains. The Antarctic (Academy of Sciences, USSR), 18:5473[in Russian].Google Scholar
Strand, T. 1929. The Cambrian beds of the Mjøsen district in Norway. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 10:308365.Google Scholar
Tanoli, S. K., and Pickerill, R. K. 1988. Lithostratigraphy of the Cambrian–Lower Ordovician Saint John Group, southern New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 25:669690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1880. Om Agnostus-arterna i de Kambriska aflagringarne vid Andrarum. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Series C, 42:137.Google Scholar
Vogdes, A. W. 1892. On the North American species of the genus Agnostus. The American Geologist, 9:377396.Google Scholar
Vologdin, A. G., Lermontova, E., Yavorsky, V., and Yanishevsky, M. 1940. Atlas of the Leading Forms of the Fossil Faunas of the USSR; Volume 1, Cambrian. State Editorial Office for Geological Literature, Moscow, 194 p. [in Russian].Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884a. On the Cambrian faunas of North America: preliminary studies. U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 10, 73 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884b. Paleontology of the Eureka district. U.S. Geological Survey, Monograph 8, 298 p.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1936. Paradoxides oelandicus beds of Öland. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning, Series C, 394:166.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1946. Agnostidea of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden. Sveriges geologiska Undersökning. Series C, 477:1141.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of north-eastern Australia. Memoirs of Queensland Museum, 11:59112.Google Scholar
Williams, H. 1979. Appalachian orogen in Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 16:792807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia-lu, Yang. 1978. Middle and Upper Cambrian trilobites of western Hunan and eastern Guizhou. Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 4:182[in Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Yang Jia-lu, and 9 others. 1991. Cambrian Stratigraphy, Lithofacies, Palaeogeography and Trilobite Faunas of east Qinling-Dabashan Mountains. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, 192 p. [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Young, G. A., and Ludvigsen, R. 1989. Mid-Cambrian trilobites from the lowest part of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 392, 49 p.Google Scholar
Wentang, Zhang, and Jell, P. A. 1987. Cambrian Trilobites of North China; Chinese Cambrian Trilobites Housed in the Smithsonian Institution. Science Press, Beijing, 459 p.Google Scholar
11
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Revision of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Agnostus acadicus Hartt
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Revision of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Agnostus acadicus Hartt
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Revision of the Middle Cambrian trilobite Agnostus acadicus Hartt
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *