Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-qp9dn Total loading time: 0.213 Render date: 2021-06-20T17:17:49.347Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

The apparatus of the Carboniferous conodont Vogelgnathus simplicatus and the early evolution of the genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

Javier Sanz-López
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Geología, c/ Jesús Arias de Velasco s/n, 33005 Oviedo, Spain 〈sanzjavier@uniovi.es〉, 〈blancosilvia@uniovi.es〉
Silvia Blanco-Ferrera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Geología, c/ Jesús Arias de Velasco s/n, 33005 Oviedo, Spain 〈sanzjavier@uniovi.es〉, 〈blancosilvia@uniovi.es〉
C. Giles Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 〈G.Miller@nhm.ac.uk〉

Abstract

The apparatus of Vogelgnathus simplicatus (Rhodes, Austin, and Druce, 1969) is reconstructed from discrete elements from a sample of limited diversity from the Limerick Province (Ireland). The apparatus is typical of the order Ozarkodinida and the P1 element was previously placed within Gnathodus. Here we assign it to Vogelgnathus by applying a multielemental concept rather than using P1 element morphology. The holotype and paratypes are re-illustrated and the species distribution revised based on published data. Vogelgnathus simplicatus ranges from the late Tournaisian to the early Viséan (Mississippian, Carboniferous), with common occurrences relating to the growth of Waulsortian bank complexes in a high-stand sea-level along the southern and western margins of the Laurussian landmass (Belgium, the British Isles, the Republic of Ireland, and USA). Vogelgnathus simplicatus appears to represent the rootstock from which deep-water and shallow-water Viséan species of Vogelgnathus evolved in the Mississippian.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adams, A.E., Wright, V.P., and Cossey, P.J., 2004, Chapter 9, South Wales-Mendip Shelf, in Cossey, P.J., Adams, A.E., Purnell, M.A., Whiteley, M.J., Whyte, M.A., and Wright, V.P., eds., British Lower Carboniferous Stratigraphy: Peterborough, Geological Conservation Review Series 29, John Nature Conservation Committee, p. 395475.Google Scholar
Agematsu, S., Sano, H., and Sashida, K., 2014, Natural assemblages of Hindeodus conodonts from a Permian-Triassic boundary sequence, Japan: Palaeontology, v. 57, p. 12771289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agematsu, S., Uesugi, K., Sano, H., and Sashida, K., 2017, Reconstruction of the multielement apparatus of the earliest Triassic conodont, Hindeodus parvus, using synchrotron radiation X-ray micro-tomography: Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 11201127.Google Scholar
Aldridge, R.J., Austin, R.L., and Husri, S., 1968, Viséan conodonts from North Wales and Ireland: Nature, v. 219, p. 255258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R.L., 1975, The biostratigraphic distribution of conodonts in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland, in Bouckaert, J., and Streel, M., eds., International Symposium Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur 1974: Brussels, Geological Survey of Belgium, Publication 3, p. 1–17. [imprint 1974]Google Scholar
Austin, R.L., and Husri, S., 1975, Dinantian conodont faunas of County Clare, County Limerick and County Leitrim. An Appendix, in Bouckaert, J., and Streel, M., eds., International Symposium Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur 1974: Brussels, Geological Survey of Belgium, Publication 3, p. 18–69. [imprint 1974]Google Scholar
Belka, Z., and Groessens, E., 1986, Conodont succession across the Tournaisian-Viséan boundary beds at Salet, Belgium: Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie, v. 95, p. 257280.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G., 1957, Die Conodonten-Stratigraphie des rheno-herzynischen Unterkarbons mit Berücksichtigung der Wocklumeria-Stufe und der Devon/Karbon-Grenze: Hessisches Landesamt für Bodenforschung, v. 19, p. 164.Google Scholar
Blanco-Ferrera, S., Sanz-López, J., García-López, S., Bastida, F., and Valín, M.L., 2011, Conodont alteration and tectonothermal evolution of a diagenetic unit in the Iberian Variscan belt (Ponga Cuera unit, NW Spain): Geological Magazine, v. 148, p. 3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branson, E.B., 1938, Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri. Part 1: Columbia, University of Missouri Studies, v. 13, no. 3, p. 1127.Google Scholar
Branson, E.B., and Mehl, M.G., 1934, Conodonts from the Bushberg Sandstone and equivalent formations of Missouri: Columbia, University of Missouri Studies, v. 8, no. 4, p. 265299. [imprint 1933]Google Scholar
Branson, E.B., and Mehl, M.G., 1938, Conodonts from the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, in Branson, E.B., Mehl, M.G., Miller, A.K., Peck, R., Keyte, I.A., and Furnish, W.M., eds., Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri. Part 2: Columbia, University of Missouri Studies, v. 13, no. 4, p. 128148.Google Scholar
Branson, E.B., and Mehl, M.G., 1941, New and little known Carboniferous conodont genera: Journal of Paleontology, v. 15, p. 97116.Google Scholar
Carman, M.R., 1987, Conodonts of the Lake Valley Formation (Kinderhookian–Osagean), Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico, U.S.A, in Brenckle, P.L., Lane, H.R., and Manger, W.L., eds., Selected Studies in Carboniferous Paleontology and Biostratigraphy: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 99, p. 4773.Google Scholar
Chauffe, K.M., and Nichols, P.A., 1995, Multielement conodont species from the Louisiana Limestone (Upper Devonian) of west-central Illinois and northeastern Missouri, U.S.A.: Micropaleontology, v. 41, p. 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D.L., 1972, Early Permian crisis and its bearing on Permo–Triassic conodont taxonomy: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. SB 1, p. 147158.Google Scholar
Conil, R., Groessens, E., and Lys, M., 1976, Étude micropaléontologique de la tranchée Yves-Gomezée (Tn3c–V1–V2, Belgique): Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie, v. 82, p. 201239. [imprint 1973]Google Scholar
Donoghue, P.C.J., Purnell, M.A., Aldridge, R.J., and Zhang, S., 2008, The interrelationships of ‘complex’ conodonts (Vertebrata): Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 6, p. 119153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvorak, J., and Freyer, G., 1961, Die Devon/Karbon-Grenze im Mährischen Karst auf der Grundlage von Conodontenfaunen: Geologie, v. 8, p. 881895.Google Scholar
Dzik, J., 1976, Remarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 21, p. 395455.Google Scholar
Ellison, S.P., 1941, Revision of the Pennsylvanian conodonts: Journal of Paleontology, v. 15, p. 107143.Google Scholar
Flügel, H., and Ziegler, W., 1957, Die Gliederung des Oberdevons und Unterkarbons am Steinberg westlich von Graz mit Conodonten: Mitteilungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins der Steiermark, v. 87, p. 2560.Google Scholar
Grayson, R.C., Merrill, G.K., and Lambert, L.L., 1991, Carboniferous gnathodontid conodont apparatuses: evidence for the dual origin for Pennsylvanian taxa: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, v. 118, p. 353396.Google Scholar
Groessens, E., 1975, Distribution des conodontes dans le Dinantien de la Belgique, in Bouckaert, J., and Streel, M., eds., International Symposium Belgian Micropaleontological Limits from Emsian to Visean, Namur 1974: Brussels, Geological Survey of Belgium, Publication 17, 193 p. [imprint 1974]Google Scholar
Groessens, E., Conil, R., and Lys, M., 1976, Problèmes relatifs à la limite du Tournaisien et du Viséen en Belgique: Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie, v. 82, p. 1750. [imprint 1973]Google Scholar
Gunnell, F.H., 1933, Conodonts and fish remains from the Cherokee, Kansas City, and Wabaunsee groups of Missouri and Kansas: Journal of Paleontology, v. 7, p. 261297.Google Scholar
Histon, K., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 1993, Carboniferous nautiloids and the bathymetry of Waulsortian limestones in Ireland: Proceedings of Geologists’ Association, v. 104, p. 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igo, H., 1973, Lower Carboniferous conodonts from the Akiyoshi Limestone Group, Southwest Japan: Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, v. 92, p. 185199.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T.B.H., Crane, D.T., and Mory, A.J., 1993, Conodont biostratigraphy of the Visean Series in eastern Australia: Alcheringa, v. 17, p. 211283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.S., and Higgins, A.C., 1981, Conodont faunas from the Lower Carboniferous rocks at Hook Head, County Wexford: Journal of Earth Sciences of Royal Dublin Society, v. 4, p. 8396.Google Scholar
Kabanov, P.B., Gibshman, N.B., Barskov, I.S., Alekseev, A.S., and Goreva, N.V., 2009, Addendum, Zaborie section, lectostratoype of Serpukhovian Stage, in Alekseev, A.S., and Goreva, N.N., eds., Type and Reference Carboniferous Sections in the South Part of the Moscow Basin. Field Trip Guidebook of International Field Meeting of the IUGS Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, August 11–12, 2009: Moscow, Borissiak Paleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, p. 45–64.Google Scholar
King, D.T. Jr, 1990, Probable influence of early Carboniferous (Tournaisian–early Visean) geography on the development of Waulsortian and Waulsortian-like mounds: Geology, v. 18, p. 591594.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koike, T., 1967, A Carboniferous succession of conodont faunas from the Atetsu Limestone in southwest Japan (studies of Asiatic conodonts, Part 6): Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Science Reports, Section C (Geology, Mineralogy and Geography), v. 9, no. 93, p. 279318.Google Scholar
Lane, R.H., and Brenckle, P.L., 2005, Type Mississippian subdivisions and biostratigraphic succession, in Heckel, P.H., ed., Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Mississippian Subsystem (Carboniferous System) in its Type Region, the Mississippi River Valley of Illinois, Missouri, and Iowa: Champaign, Illinois State Geological Survey, v. 34, p. 76105.Google Scholar
Lane, H.R., Sandberg, C.A., and Ziegler, W., 1980, Taxonomy and phylogeny of some Lower Carboniferous conodonts and preliminary post-Siphonodella zonation: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 14, p. 117164.Google Scholar
Lees, A., 2006, Waulsortian: Geologica Belgica, v. 9, p. 151155.Google Scholar
Lees, A., and Miller, J., 1995, Waulsortian banks, in Monty, C.L.V., Bosence, D.W.J., Bridges, P.H., and Pratt, B.R., eds., Carbonate Mud-Mounds: Their Origin and Evolution: Oxford, Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists 23, Blackwell Science Ltd, p. 191–171.Google Scholar
MacNeil, L.A., Pufahl, P.K., and James, N.P., 2018, Deposition of a saline giant in the Mississippian Windsor Group, Nova Scotia, and the nascent Late Paleozoic Ice Age: Sedimentary Geology, v. 363, p. 118135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, P., and Wensink, H., 1970, Conodonts and the age of the “Griotte” Limestone Formation in the Upper Aragon Valley (Huesca, Spain): Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen-Amsterdam, Proceedings, Serie B, v. 73, p. 238275.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, I., 1981, Conodont Zonation and Correlation of the Dinantian and Early Namurian Strata of the Craven Lowlands of Northern England: London, Institute of Geological Science, Report 80/10, 70 p.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M., Reynolds, M.J., Laloux, M., and Owens, B., 1982, Biostratigraphy of the Knap Farm Borehole at Cannington Park, Somerset, in Whittaker, A., and Scrivener, R.C., eds., The Geology of the IGS deep Borehole (Devonian-Carboniferous) at Knap Farm, Cannington Park, Somerset: London, Institute of Geological Sciences, Report 82/5, p. 9–17.Google Scholar
Mizuno, Y., 1997, Conodont faunas across the Mid-Carboniferous boundary in the Hina Limestone, Southwest Japan: Paleontological Research, v. 1, p. 237259.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T.I., 2005, Late Viséan/early Serpukhovian conodont succession from the Triollo section, Palencia (Cantabrian Mountains, Spain): Scripta Geologica, v. 129, p. 1389.Google Scholar
Nemyrovska, T.I., Perret-Mirouse, M.F., and Weyant, M., 2006, The early Viséan (Carboniferous) conodonts from the Saoura Valley Algeria: Acta Geologica Polonica, v. 56, p. 361370.Google Scholar
Norby, R.D., 1976, Conodont apparatuses from Chesterian (Mississippian) strata of Montana and Illinois [Ph.D. dissertation]: Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, University of Illinois, 295 p.Google Scholar
Norby, R.D., and Rexroad, C.B., 1985, Vogelgnathus, a new Mississippian conodont genus: Bloomington, Indiana Geological Survey, Occasional Paper, v. 50, 14 p.Google Scholar
Pander, H.C., 1856, Monographie der fossilen Fische des silurischen Systems der russischbaltischen Gouvernements: Saint Petersburg, Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 91 p.Google Scholar
Park, S.-I., 1983, Zonenfolge, phylogenie und Taxonomie karbonischer Conodonten zwischen Tournai und Westfal (Westeuropa) [Ph.D. dissertation]: Marburg, Hesse, Germany, Universität Marburg, 189 p.Google Scholar
Purnell, M.A., 1992, Conodonts of the Lower Border Group and equivalent strata (Lower Carboniferous) in Northern Cumbria and the Scottish Borders, U.K.: Toronto, Royal Ontario Museum Life Sciences Contributions, v. 156, 179 p.Google Scholar
Purnell, M.A., 1993, The Kladognathus apparatus (Conodonta, Carboniferous): homologies with ozarkodinids and the prioniodinid bauplan: Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 875882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, M.A., and Donoghue, P.C.J., 1997, Architecture and functional morphology of the skeletal apparatus of ozarkodinid conodonts: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, v. 352, p. 15451564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, M.A., and Donoghue, P.C.J., 1998, Skeletal architecture, homologies and taphonomy of ozarkodinid conodonts: Palaeontology, v. 41, p. 57102.Google Scholar
Purnell, M.A., and von Bitter, P.H., 1992, Vogelgnathus Norby and Rexroad (Conodonta): new species from the Lower Carboniferous of Atlantic Canada and northern England: Journal of Paleontology, v. 66, p. 311332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purnell, M.A., Donoghue, P.C.J., and Aldridge, R.J., 2000, Orientation and anatomical notation in conodonts: Journal of Paleontology, v. 74, p. 113122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, Y., Nemyrovska, T.I., Wang, X., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Lane, H.R., Richards, B.C., Hu, K., and Wang, Q., 2014, Late Visean–early Serpukhovian conodont succession at the Naqing (Nashui) section in Guizhou, South China: Geological Magazine, v. 151, p. 254268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., 1957, Conodonts from the Chester Series in the type area of southwestern Illinois: Urbana, Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigations v. 199, 43 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., 1958, Conodonts from the Glen Dean Formation (Chester) of the Illinois Basin: Urbana, Illinois State Geological Survey, Report of Investigations v. 209, 27 p.Google Scholar
Rexroad, C.B., and Merrill, G. K., 1996, Conodonts from the Reelsville Limestone (Chesterian, Lower Carboniferous) in Indiana and adjacent Kentucky, U.S.A.: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 39, p. 225238.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F.H.T., Austin, R.L., and Druce, E.C., 1969, British Avonian (Carboniferous) conodont faunas, and their value in local and intercontinental correlation: London, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Supplement, v. 5, 313 p.Google Scholar
Rowley, D.B., Raymond, A., Parrish, J.T., Lottes, A.L., Scotese, C.R., and Ziegler, A.M., 1985, Carboniferous paleogeographic, phytogeographic, and paleoclimatic reconstructions: International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 5, p. 742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, H., 1934, Conodonten-Funde in urspriinglichem zusammenhang: Palaontologische Zeitschrift, v. 16, p. 7685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevastopulo, G.D. 1982, The age and depositional setting of the Waulsortian limestones in Ireland, in Bolton, K., Lane, H.R., and LeMone, D.V., eds., Symposium on the Paleoenvironmental Setting and Distribution of the Waulsortian facies: El Paso and Alamogordo, El Paso Geological Society and the University of Texas at El Paso, p. 65–79.Google Scholar
Sevastopulo, G.D., and Wyse Jackson, P.N., 2009, Carboniferous: Mississippian (Tournaisian and Viséan), in Holland, C.H., and Saunders, I.S., eds., The Geology of Ireland, 2nd edition: Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press, p. 215547.Google Scholar
Somerville, I.D., Strogen, P., and Jones, G.L., 1992, Biostratigraphy of Dinantian limestones and associated volcanic rocks of the East Limerick Syncline: Geological Journal, v. 27, p. 201220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, W.C., 1970, Uppermost Permian and Lower Triassic of the Salt Range and Trans-Indus ranges, in Kummel, B., and Teichert, C., eds., Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan: University of Kansas, Department of Geology, Special Publication, v. 4, p. 207275.Google Scholar
Sweet, W.C., 1988, The Conodonta: morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology and evolutionary history of a long extinct animal phylum: Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, v. 10, 212 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, T.L., 1967, Conodont zonation of Lower Osagean rocks (Lower Mississippian) of southwestern Missouri: Rolla, Missouri Geological Survey, Report of Investigations v. 39, 88 p.Google Scholar
Thompson, T.L., and Fellows, L.D., 1970, Stratigraphy and conodont biostratigraphy of Kinderhookian and Osagean (Lower Mississippian) rocks of Southwestern Missouri and adjacent areas: Rolla, Missouri Geological Survey and Water Resources, Report of Investigations no. 45, 263 p.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., and Bassler, R.S., 1926, A classification of the toothlike fossils, conodonts, with descriptions of American Devonian and Mississippian species: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 68, no. 12, 63 p.Google Scholar
van den Boogaard, M., 1992, The recurrence of Vogelgnathus campbelli-dominated conodont faunas in the Visean and early Namurian of the Cantabrian Mts. (Spain): a reflection of sea-level fluctuations?: Scripta Geologica, v. 99, p. 133.Google Scholar
Voges, A., 1959, Conodonten aus dem Unterkarbon I and II (Gattendorfia- und Pericyclus-Stufe) des Sauerlandes: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 33, p. 266314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bitter, P.H., Giles, P.S., and Utting, J., 2007, Biostratigraphic correlation of major cycles in the Windsor and Codroy groups of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, Atlantic Canada, with the Mississippian substages of Britain and Ireland, in Wong, T.E., ed., Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy: Amsterdam, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, p. 513534.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W., and Miller, A.K., 1949, Conodonts from the late Mississippian Pella Beds of south central Iowa: Journal of Paleontology, v. 23, p. 617622.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Jiang, H., Purnell, M.A., and Lai, X., 2017, Testing hypotheses of element loss and instability in the apparatus composition of complex conodonts: articulated skeletons of Hindeodus : Palaeontology, v. 60, p. 595608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, W., 1960, Die Conodonten aus den Gerollen des Zechsteinconglomerate von Rossensay (sudwestlich Rheinberg/Niederrhein): Fortschritte in der Geologie von Rheinland and Westfalen, v. 6, p. 115.Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The apparatus of the Carboniferous conodont Vogelgnathus simplicatus and the early evolution of the genus
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The apparatus of the Carboniferous conodont Vogelgnathus simplicatus and the early evolution of the genus
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The apparatus of the Carboniferous conodont Vogelgnathus simplicatus and the early evolution of the genus
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *