Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:25:01.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An upper Miocene hexactinellid sponge from the Puente Shale, Orange County, California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

J. Keith Rigby  and
Yvonne Albi
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Room 210 Page School, Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Yvonne Albi
Affiliation:
7001 Vista Del Mar Lane, Playa del Rey, California 90293
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Well-preserved, laterally flattened, farreid hexactinellid sponges of the new species Farrea rugosa have been recently discovered in the upper Miocene Puente Shale in the Peralta Hills in southeastern Anaheim, Orange County, California. This is the first farreid sponge reported from the Miocene of California and is one of the few Miocene sponges reported from North America. The cluster is of upward bifurcating, moderately complex sponges in which branches are regularly rugose and skeletons are each a single layer of dictyid net, with aborted proximal and distal rays in the otherwise laterally fused quadruled skeleton of original silica. The sponges occur in pinkish brown sandy siltstone in the limited exposure beneath older alluvium that blankets much of the local area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 70 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 908 - 913
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowerbank, J. S. 1862. On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae, parts 2, 3. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 152:747–836, 1087-1135.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J. 1873. On the Hexactinellidae and Lithistidae generally, and particularly on the Aphrocallistidae, Aulodictyon, and Farrea, together with facts elicited from their deciduous structures and descriptions respectively of three new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 12:349–373, 437-465.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., and ten Dam, D. A. 1948. Pseudoparella, a new generic name, and a new species of Parella. Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research, Contributions, 24(3):49–50.Google Scholar
Daviess, S. N., and Woodford, A. O. 1949. Geology of the northwestern Puente Hills, Los Angeles County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Preliminary Map 83.Google Scholar
D'Orbigny, A. D. 1839. Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale-Foraminifères. Pitois-Lerrault et Ce., Paris, 5(5):86 p.Google Scholar
Eldridge, G. H., and Arnold, R. 1907. The Santa Clara Valley, Puente Hills, and Los Angeles oil districts, southern California. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 309, 266 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Paleontology, 2, 229 p.Google Scholar
Günther, A. C. L. G. 1878. Fish from the Arctic regions, p. 156–218. In Nares, G. S. (ed.), Narrative of a Voyage to the Polar Seas during 1875-1876 in H. M. Ships Alert and Discovery, 2nd edition. Volume 2, Appendix 4. London.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, W. S., and Berry, C. T. 1937. A new genus of Foraminifera from the Miocene of Venezuela and Trinidad. Journal of Paleontology, 11:29–30.Google Scholar
Ijima, I. 1927. The Hexactinellida of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga Expeditie. M. Weber (ed.), Vitkomsten op zoologisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch gebeid versameld in Nederlands Oost-Indië, 1899-1900, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 6:1–138.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. S., and Gilbert, J. Z. 1919. Fossil fishes of the Miocene (Monterey) formations, p. 13–60. In Jordan, D. S., Fossil Fishes of Southern California. Leland Stanford Junior University Publication, University series, 98 p.Google Scholar
Montfort, Denys de. 1808. Conchyliologie systématique et classification methodique des coquilles. 1:lxxxvii plus409 p.Google Scholar
Moret, L. 1926. Contribution a l'étude des Spongiaires siliceux du Crétacé supériur français. Mémoire de la Société Géologique de France, nouvelle série 5, 2(4):1–120; 3(1):121-338.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1958-1964. Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Palaeontographical Society, London. 1958a, Pt. 1, Volume 111, p. i–xlvi; 1958b, Pt. 2, Volume 112, p. xlvii-xlviii, 1-26; 1961, Pt. 3, Volume 115, p. 27-48; 1964, Pt. 4, Volume 118, p. xlix-cliv.Google Scholar
Richmond, J. F. 1952. Geology of Burruel Ridge, northwestern Santa Ana Mountains. California Division of Mines Special Report, 27, 16 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongienfauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schoellhamer, J. E., Kinney, D. M., Yerkes, R. F., and Vedder, J. G. 1954. Geologic map of the northern Santa Ana Mountains, Orange and Riverside Counties, California. U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigations Map OM-154.Google Scholar
Schoellhamer, J. E., Vedder, J. G., Yerkes, R. F., and Kinney, D. M. 1981. Geology of the northern Santa Ana Mountains, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 420-D:D1–D109.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1903. Zur systematik der Kieselspongien. Mitteillung Roemer-Museum Hildesheim, no. 19, 21 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1910-1912. Die Keiselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland, I und II Teil. Palaeontographica, Supplements. 1910, 5:1–176; 1912, 7:177-385.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1885. The Hexactinellida, p. 437–451. In Tizard, T. H., Moseley, H. W., Buchanan, M. A., and Murray, J., Narrative of the cruise of H.M.S. Challenger with a general account of the scientific results of the expedition. Reports on the Scientific Results of the H.M.S. Challenger, Narrative, Volume 1, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1887. Ueber den Bau und des System der Hexactinelliden. Abhandlungen der Königlich Preussichen Akademie Wissenschaften für 1886, Berlin, 97 p.Google Scholar
Topsent, E. 1904. Spongiaires des Açores. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques accompiés par le Prince Albert I, Monaco, 25, 280 p.Google Scholar