Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T16:46:34.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Testing of Airborne Inertial Navigation Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Extract

The limitations to the accuracy of an inertial navigator are first of all the inherent accuracy of the inertial components—gyros and accelerometers; secondly the accuracy with which these are controlled, i.e. by power supplies, and electronic circuitry; thirdly the accuracy of the associated navigation computer. All these three can be checked during manufacture and by laboratory testing of components and systems. However, there remains the effect of the aircraft environment on accuracy. It is possible to simulate some of the environment, for example vibration and temperature, in the laboratory, but it is not possible to simulate realistic accelerations, velocities and displacements, and so flight trials form an essential part of the evaluation of an inertial system. Flight trials may be preceded by trials in a land vehicle on grounds of economy, but such trials are of limited value because of the limited velocities and displacements available. In this paper we shall attempt to summarize our experience at R.A.E. and A. & A.E.E. of laboratory, van and flight testing of inertial navigators which has been acquired in joint trials over the past five or six years. During the next twelve months we shall be associated in trials of three further inertial navigators, the Elliott E5, the Sperry SGN 10 and the Ferranti FMP-B, and we shall also describe in this paper some of the techniques which will be used for the first time in these trials. This is not intended to be an exhaustive treatment of system testing, but will be mainly confined to the systems and tests of which we have practical experience.

Type
The Performance of Airborne Inertial Systems
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Thomas, I. L., Plumbly, R. W. and Pitt, R. J. (1960). Sources of error in precision force feedback accelerometers and methods of testing. R.A.E. Tech Note IAP 1076.Google Scholar
2Shuttlewood, G. D. (1964). Testing of inertial quality gyroscopes. Inst. Mech. Eng. Proceedings 1964–5, Vol. 179, Part 3E, Paper 3.Google Scholar
3Carter, J. V. and Evans, R. H. (1966). Testing of gyros for aircraft inertial navigation applications. Proceedings of the Third Inertial Guidance Test Symposium at Holloman AFB, 10 1966.Google Scholar
4Smith, S. G. (1966). The use of doppler radar and an airborne digital computer as aids in the flight testing of inertial navigation systems. Proceedings of Third Inertial Guidance Test Symposium at Holloman AFB, 10 1966.Google Scholar
5 Air Standardization Coordinating Committee (1966). The specification and evaluation of the accuracy of inertial navigation systems. ASCC Air Std. S3/ll, 30 06 1966.Google Scholar
6Preston, J. S. (1962). Trial of a photographic attitude and heading reference technique. A. & A.E.E. Report AAEEjTech/228/Nav., 07 1962.Google Scholar
7Smith, S. G. and Thomas, I. L. (1966). The long period errors of doppler and inertial navigation systems. R.A.E. Tech Report No. 66084.Google Scholar