Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:55:07.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Commercial Wind Propulsion Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

W. M. S. Bradbury
W. M. S. Bradbury
Affiliation:
(Imperial College Aeronautics Department)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The commercial viability of wind propulsion is of itself not strictly a navigational problem. However, the implications for navigation of a return to commercial sail in some form are clearly considerable. Mr Bradbury's summary of the various proposals put forward in the last few years and the extensive bibliography will interest many navigators.

In 1980 The Times printed an article on its front page under the headline ‘Oil prices put sails back on the horizon’ (Baily, 1980). This article must have surprised many people. It reflected a growing awareness and interest in the idea of wind propulsion for commercial ships. A better indication of this interest may be the number of related symposia held since the oil crisis. The symposia have been held by The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (1975 and 1980), Liverpool Polytechnic (1976), this Institute (1977), and the Department of Industry (1979). Some interesting papers by Mudie (1977a, b and 1980) have particularly brought the subject to the attention of this Institute.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 24 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES AND REFERENCES

1The Future of commercial Sail. Symp Proc. (1975), R. Instn. Nav. Archit.Google Scholar
2The Technical and Economic Feasibility of Commercial Sailing Ships, Symp. Proc. (1976), Liverpool Polytechnic Department of Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
3The Practicability of Commercial Sail, Symp. Proc. (1977). This Journal, 30 , 163.Google Scholar
4The Viability of Commercial Sailing Ships, Symp. Proc. (1979), Department of Industry SMTRB.Google Scholar
5Wind Propulsion of Commercial Ships, Symp. Proc. (1980), R. Instn. Nav. Archit.Google Scholar
Anon (1975a). Dynaship — resurgence of sail? Mar. Week 2, no. 20, 33.Google Scholar
Anon (1975b). Return of the cargo sailing vessel. Dock Harb. Author. 56, 48.Google Scholar
Anon. (1976). Give sail a chance. Mar. Week 3, no. 45, 13.Google Scholar
Anon. (1978a). Hands to the braces again. The News Portsmouth (7 July), 14.Google Scholar
Anon. (1978b). Wind propulsion concept. Ship Boat Int. 31, no. 6, 22.Google Scholar
Anon. (1979a). Back to sail. Shipp. Wld. Shipbldr. 172, 738.Google Scholar
Anon. (1979b). Fuel economy in ship propulsion. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (March), 30.Google Scholar
Anon. (1979c). NKK sail research. Ship Boat Int., 32, no. 12, 52.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980a). A 5,000 tdw five-masted auxiliary barque proposed. Shipbldg Mar. Engrg. Int. (March), 110.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980b). Japanese sail on regardless. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (March), 37.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980c). Japan launches first wind assisted ship. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (Oct.), 19.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980d). Japan to launch sail fleet. Observer (6 July), 14.Google Scholar
Anon. (1980c). Windpower — a history of the future. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (Dec), 16.Google Scholar
Anon. (1981). States windship study. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (May), 30.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982a). Now a 12,000 dwt German sailing ship. Shipbldg. Mar. Engrg. Int. (Nov.), 515.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982b). Sail equipped cargo carrier ordered. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (Nov.), 34.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982c). Sailpower progress continues in Japan. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (July), 28.Google Scholar
Anon. (1983a). American wind power: new demonstration sails through first tests. Mar. Engrs. Rev. (Jan.), 15.Google Scholar
Anon. (1983b). BP flies an alternative kite. New Scient. 98, 371.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. (1982). Sail-bitten, Ship Boat Int. 112, no. 3, 5.Google Scholar
Azad, S. A. (1978). Commercial Sailing Ships New Bulletin no. 3. Liverpool Polytechnic Department of Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
Azad, S. A. (1980). Commercial Sailing Ships News Bulletin no. 5. Liverpool Polytechnic Department of Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
Baily, M. (1980). Oil prices put sails back on horizon. The Times (9 Aug.), 1.Google Scholar
Barkla, H. M. (1951). High speed sailing. Trans. R. Instn. Nav. Archit. 93, 248.Google Scholar
Bowbee, A. (1980). Sail cargo ships — progress. Ship Boat Int. 33, no. 11, 60.Google Scholar
Bradbury, W. M. S. (1980b). An investigation of graduated trim for an aerofoil rig. Symp. ref. 5, paper 12.Google Scholar
Bradbury, W. M. S. (1980a). Wind tunnel tests of a model aerofoil ship. Imperial College Aero. Dept. 80—04.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1834). The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. New York: Dover (1970).Google Scholar
Cornell, J. (1979). Modern auxiliary schooner and ferry for Fiji. Ship Boat Int. 32, no. 1, 15.Google Scholar
Cornell, J. (1980). Notes on Fiji shipping. Ship Boat Int. 33, no. 4, 26.Google Scholar
Couper, A. D. and King, J. (1980). Commercial sail — present operations and future prospects. Symp. ref. 5 above, paper 3.Google Scholar
Cross, M. (1983). Setting sail on wind-power with — the Pru. New Scient. 98, 141.Google Scholar
Crowdy, E. P. (1980). The economics of sail. Symp. ref. 5, paper 5.Google Scholar
Cullinson, A. E. (1980). Tanker powered by sails. Daily Telegraph (2 Aug.), 5.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce, U.S.A. (1979). Marad awards contract for sailing ship study. News report MA NR 79–8.Google Scholar
Department of Industry (1979). Dol to study commercial sail. Press notice, 19 Sep.Google Scholar
Dynaship Corporation (1975). Dynaship — modern wind powered cargo ships to 45,000 dwt (brochure).Google Scholar
Flettner, A. (1926). The story of the rotor. Crosby, Lockwood and Son.Google Scholar
Green, P. (1980). Will the windjammers return? Port Land. 55, 78.Google Scholar
Greenhill, B. (1972). The sailing ship in a fuel crisis. Ecologist 1, no. 9, 8.Google Scholar
Hasler, H. G. (1977). A rig for coastal trades. Symp. ref. 3, paper 7.Google Scholar
Herbert, C. C. (1980). The design challenge of the wind powered ship. Symp. ref. 5, paper 15.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1978). The return of the square rig? Ships Mon. 13, no. 4, 35.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1979a). Trading under sail. Ships Mon. 14, no. 2, 11.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1979b). More commercial sail. Ships Mon. 14, no. 12, 12.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1980a). Cargo under sail. Ships Mon. 15, no. 4, 12.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1980b). What price the wind? Ships Mon. 15, no. 10, 30.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1982a). Towage under sail. Ships Mon. 17, no. 2, 29.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1982b). Theory and practice. Ships Mon. 17, no. 4, 13.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1982c). Commercial sail. Ships Mon. 17, no. 10, 34.Google Scholar
Hogben, R. (1983). Under sail – commercial talk and action. Ships Mon. 18, no. 2, 10.Google Scholar
Hood, W. J. (1979). The future of commercial sailing ships. In Man and Navigation, Proc. Symp. Int. Congr. Inst. Nav., 300.Google Scholar
Hood, W. J. (1980). Using wind reliable routes for bulk cargo transport. Symp. Ref. 5, paper 2.Google Scholar
Illies, K. (1977). Energie für Schiffsantriebe — eine Zukunftsbetrachtung, Jb. Schiffbautech. Ges. 75, 68.Google Scholar
Irani, D. B. (1980). Country craft and sailing vessels of India. Nav. Archit. 189.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, M. A. (1980). A multi-purpose tuna fishing boat with combined propulsion. Symp. ref. 5. paper 17.Google Scholar
King, J. F. R. (1975). A technical description and performance analysis of the Dynaship. Symp. ref. 1, paper 1.Google Scholar
King, J. F. R. (1976). A forecast for sailing ships. Futures, 517.Google Scholar
Lawrence, H. G. (1975). A modern fore and aft rigged sailing cargo ship. Symp. ref. 1, paper 2.Google Scholar
Lemon, J. B. (1975). Dynaship. Mar. Week 2, no. 26, 20.Google Scholar
Morin Scott, H. F. (1980). A full scale experiment in commercial auxiliary sail. Symp. ref. 5, paper 14.Google Scholar
Mudie, C. (1977a). Reducing the running costs at sea. Symp. ref. 3, paper 2.Google Scholar
Mudie, C. (1977b). Some reflections on the optimal use of wind power. Symp. ref. 3. paper 8.Google Scholar
Mudie, C. (1980). Some aspects of commercial sail. This Journal, 33, 56.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1976a). Can ‘sailers’ make a come-back? Sea Breezes, 296.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1976b). Outlook for the Dynaship. Sea Breezes, 478.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1976c). A triad of schooners, Sea Breezes, 635.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1978a). Proving race plan, Sea Breezes, 326.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1978b). Ideas from Australia, Sea Breezes, 611.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1979). The role of the engineer in the windship revolution. Symp. ref. 4, paper 2.Google Scholar
Nance, C. T. (1980). Wind power for ships — a general survey. Symp. ref. 5, paper 1.Google Scholar
North, R. (1979). Will tall ships return? Observer Mag. (10 June), 67.Google Scholar
Pike, D. (1980). Magnus-effect rudder. Ship Boat Int. 33, no. 10, 39.Google Scholar
Pike, D. (1982). A sail assisted cargo vessel. Ship Boat Int. 35, no. 10, 24.Google Scholar
Prölss, W. (1967). Zür Frage der Wirtschaftlichkeit von windangetriebene Handelschiffen. Jb. Schiffbautech. Ges. 61, 36.Google Scholar
Otto-Scherer, J. (1974). Aerodynamics of high performance wing sails. Mar. Tech. 11, 270.Google Scholar
Rainey, R. C. T. (1980). The wind turbine ship. Symp. ref. 5, paper 8.Google Scholar
Rocca, T. (1980). Now what are the Japanese up to? Launching sail ships. Sun. Times Mag. (28 Sept.), 34.Google Scholar
Scantling (1978). Tonga sail schemes. Ship Boat Int. 31, no. 6, 3.Google Scholar
Scantling (1978b). Vegetables or wind? Ship Boat Int. 31, no. 6, 3.Google Scholar
Scantling (1979a). Sailing tugs? Ship Boat Int. 32, no. 7, 3.Google Scholar
Scantling (1982a). Selling sail. Ship Boat Int. 35, no. 9, 3.Google Scholar
Scantling (1982b). Lucander on sail. Ship Boat Int. 35, no. 12, 3.Google Scholar
Schaefer, G. W. and Allsop, K. (1980). Kite sails for wind-assisted ship propulsion. Symp. ref. 5, paper 9.Google Scholar
Schenzle, P. (1976). Comparative sailing speed in wind propulsion. Symp. ref. 2, 37.Google Scholar
Stoeckert, T. M. (1968). Sailboat wings through water. Product Engrg 39, no. 15, 8.Google Scholar
Thieme, H. (1955). Mechanic des Segelantriebes. Jb. Schiffbautech. Ges. 49, 306.Google Scholar
Wagner, B. (1966). Windkanalversuche mit gewölbten Plattensegeln bei Mehrmastanordnung. Institut für Schiffbau der Universitat Hamburg report no. 171.Google Scholar
Wagner, B. (1967a). Fahrtgeschwindigkeitsberechnung für segelschiffe. Jb. Schiffbautech. Ges. 61, 14–35Google Scholar
Wagner, B. (1967b). Windkanalversuche für einen sechsmastigen Segler nach Prölss. Schiff Hafen 19, 165.Google Scholar
Wagner, B. (1967c). Windkanalversuche mit dem Takelagemodell einer Viermastbark. Schiff Hafen 19, 13.Google Scholar
Wagner, B. (1976). Sailing ship research at Hamburg University, Symp. Ref. 2, 21.Google Scholar
Warner, P. R. and Hood, W. J. (1975). A commercial sailing ship for the South West Pacific Ocean, Symp. ref. 1, paper 3.Google Scholar
Wellicome, J. (1975). A broad appraisal of the economic and technical requisites for a wind driven merchant vessel. Symp. ref. 1, paper 5.Google Scholar
Willoughby, R. M. (1979). The Windrose ship — why square rig? Symp. ref. 4, paper 6.Google Scholar
Willoughby, R. M. and Corlett, E. C. B. (1980). Design problems of commercial sailing ship. Symp. ref. 5, paper 16.Google Scholar
Windrose Ships Limited (1978). Brochure.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. B., Beck, R. F., Scher, R. and Cary, C. M. (1975). Feasibility of Sailing Ships for the American Merchant Marine. University of Michigan College of Engineering Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering report no. 168.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. B. (1979). Possibilities for higher speeds under sail. Trans. NE Cst Instn. Engrs Shipbldrs. 96, 45.Google Scholar