Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:57:58.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macroscopic collision risk model based on near miss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2021

Yangyu Zhou Open the ORCID record for Yangyu Zhou [Opens in a new window] ,
Jiaxuan Yang ,
Xingpei Bian ,
Lingqi Ma  and
Zhen Kang Open the ORCID record for Zhen Kang [Opens in a new window]
Yangyu Zhou
Affiliation:
Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China. The Key Labouratory of Navigation Safety Guarantee, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Jiaxuan Yang*
Affiliation:
Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China. The Key Labouratory of Navigation Safety Guarantee, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Xingpei Bian
Affiliation:
Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China. The Key Labouratory of Navigation Safety Guarantee, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Lingqi Ma
Affiliation:
Navigation College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China. The Key Labouratory of Navigation Safety Guarantee, Liaoning Province, Dalian, China.
Zhen Kang
Affiliation:
School of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: yangjiaxuan@dlmu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using near miss data detected from non-accident information to analyse marine traffic risk can alleviate some of the limitations of accident-based methods. A model based on an arena for detecting scenes of near miss is proposed to detect comprehensively those ship encounters with potential collision risk. To eliminate the influence of data sampling frequency on the detection of scenes of near miss, a single near miss is defined as the whole progress of traffic state from the time the target ship sails into the arena of the subject ship to the time it leaves the arena of the subject ship. To research the geographical distribution characteristics of marine traffic risk, first, a statistical model for the scenes of near miss based on the water grid method is proposed, and then a macroscopic collision risk model based on near miss is developed. The geographical distribution characteristics of marine traffic risk in the Bohai Sea are analysed, and the water areas of high marine traffic risk are obtained. The findings can provide theoretical support for marine safety management.

Keywords

marine traffic risknear missmacroscopic collision riskwater grid methodship domain
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 74 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 1104 - 1126
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cockroft, A. N. (1981). The estimation of collision risk for marine traffic. Journal of Navigation, 34(1), 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockroft, A. N. (1982). Collision statistic and analysis of the causes of collision. Journal of Navigation, 35(2), 305–311.Google Scholar
Davis, P. V., Dove, M. J. and Stockel, C. T. (1980). A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas. Journal of Navigation, 33(02), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, L., Goerlandt, F. and Kujala, P. (2020). Review and analysis of methods for assessing maritime waterway risk based on non-accident critical events detected from AIS data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 200, 106933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z., Yu, H., Ke, R., Shaw, S. L. and Peng, G. (2018). Automatic identification system-based approach for assessing the near-miss collision risk dynamics of ships in ports. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 99, 534–543.Google Scholar
Fiskin, R., Nasiboglu, E. and Yardimci, M. O. (2020). A knowledge-based framework for two-dimensional (2D) asymmetrical polygonal ship domain. Ocean Engineering, 202, 107187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuto, J. and Imazu, H. (2013). New collision alarm algorithm using obstacle zone by target (OZT). IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(33), 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J., Lammi, H. and Kujala, P. (2012). Analysis of Near Collisions in the Gulf of Finland. Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 2880–2886.Google Scholar
Goodwin, E. M. (1978). Marine encounter rates. Journal of Navigation, 31(03), 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänninen, M. and Kujala, P. (2014). Bayesian network modeling of port state control inspection findings and ship accident involvement. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 1632–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, N. and Luong, T. N. (2019). Potential risk ship domain as a danger criterion for real-time ship collision risk evaluation. Ocean Engineering, 194, 106610–106611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMO. (1972). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS). London: The International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
Kaneko, F. (2002). Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 7(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. and Jeong, J. S. (2016). Visualisation of Ship Collision Risk Based on Near-Miss Accidents. Joint International Conference on Soft Computing & Intelligent Systems, Singapore.Google Scholar
Langard, B., Morel, G. and Chauvin, C. (2015). Collision risk management in passenger transportation: A study of the conditions for success in a safe shipping company. Psychologie française, 60(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappalainen, J., Vepsäläinen, A., Salmi, K. and Tapaninen, U. (2011). Incident reporting in Finnish shipping companies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 10(2), 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, C. H., Ding, H. Y., Dong, G. H. and Zhang, P. Y. (2011). Risk Assessment of Offshore Platform due to Ship Collision. International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering (ICETCE), 5408–5411, Lushan, China.Google Scholar
Lewisson, G. R. G. (1978). The risk of a ship encounter leading to a collision. The Journal of Navigation, 31(03), 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, A. (2007). AIS implementation – success or failure? Journal of Navigation, 60(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., Siemianowicz, M. and Wielgosz, M. (2018). Ship domain in various visibility conditions in restricted waters. Annual of Navigation, 25(1), 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, X., Meng, Q. and Suyi, L. (2011). Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(6), 2030–2036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qu, X., Meng, Q. and Li, S. (2012). Analyses and implications of accidents in Singapore Strait. Transportation Research Record, 2273(1), 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sormunen, O., Hänninen, M. and Kujala, P. (2016). Marine traffic, accidents, and underreporting in the Baltic Sea. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 46, 163–177.Google Scholar
Szlapczynski, R. and Szlapczynska, J. (2017). Review of ship safety domains: Models and applications. Ocean Engineering, 145, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodoropoulos, G. S., Tritsarolis, A. and Theodoridis, Y. (2020). Evolving Clusters: Online Discovery of Group Patterns in Enriched Maritime Data. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Tixerant, M. L., Guyader, D. L., Gourmelon, F. and Queffelec, B. (2018). How can automatic identification system (AIS) data be used for maritime spatial planning? Ocean & Coastal Management, 166, 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Westrenen, F. and Ellerbroek, J. (2017). The effect of traffic complexity on the development of near misses on the North Sea. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics Systems, 47(3), 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, N., Meng, X., Xu, Q. and Wang, Z. (2009). A unified analytical framework for ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 62(4), 643–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Mehta, A. L., Zaloom, V. A. and Craig, B. N. (2016). Analysis of waterway transportation in Southeast Texas waterway based on AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 121, 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, S. L. (2018). Near-miss density map for safe navigation of ships. Ocean Engineering, 163, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. and Meng, Q. (2019). Probabilistic ship domain with applications to ship collision risk assessment. Ocean Engineering, 186, 106130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J. and Kujala, P. (2015). A method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 107, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W. B., Floris, G., Pentti, K. and Yinhai, W. (2016). An advanced method for detecting possible near miss ship collisions from AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 124, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Feng, X., Qi, Y., Shu, F. and Wang, Y. (2019). Towards a model of regional vessel near-miss collision risk assessment for open waters based on AIS data. Journal of Navigation, 72(6), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar