Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T20:38:45.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fuel Economies Effected by the use of FMS in an Advanced TMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1985

Extract

The title of this paper could possibly be misleading in that it suggests that we already have a solution for a problem which is still open or at least a conclusion from an investigation which is still under way.

Accordingly, we should define straight away, subject to subsequent elaboration, (a) what we mean by an ‘advanced terminal area’, (b) what in such a context could be envisaged in terms of advantages for the aviation community, namely both the airspace users and the air traffic authorities, and finally (c) what new tools, both in the air and on the ground, would be desirable or essential in order to achieve a given degree of progress.

Type
Flight Management Systems
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S.. (1980). Optimum use of cruise/descent control for the scheduling of inbound traffic. International Conference sponsored by Flight International on ‘Fuel Economy in the Airlines’, Royal Aeronautical Society, London, April 1980.Google Scholar
2Benoît, A., Sauer, P. and Swierstra, S.. (1983). Estimates of nugatory fuel consumption in an extended terminal area (Traffic inbound to London Heathrow). Eurocontrol Report 812021, March 1983.Google Scholar
3Benoît, A., Sauer, P. and Swierstra, S. (1983). Estimates of nugatory fuel consumption in an extended terminal area (Traffic inbound to Brussels National). Eurocontrol Report 812038, March 1983.Google Scholar
4 Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee (1980). Flight Management Computer System. ARINC characteristic 702–1, Aeronautical Radio Incorporated, 2551 Riva Road, Annapolis, MN 21401, USA 29 January 1980.Google Scholar
5de Boer, L. S. (1981). ‘Flight Management Systems’: studies naar de opbouw, het operationele gebruik en naar de mogelijkheden voor verdere ontwikkeling. Technische Hogeschool Delft, Afdeling der Luchtvaart- en Ruimtevaarttechniek. Memorandum M-410, Delft, Netherlands, June 1981.Google Scholar
6 International Air Transport Association (1981). Advanced Navigational Equipment carried Aircraft operating to and within the EUR Region. IATA, Regional Technical Office, Europe.Google Scholar
7Grossin, J. (1982). Calculateurs de gestion du vol. L'Onde Electrique, 62, no. 67.Google Scholar
8 KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (1983). Aircraft Operations Manual, Sections on ‘Navigation Systems’ and ‘Flight Management System’.Google Scholar
9Aardoom, W. (1982). ‘Flight Management Systems and air traffic control, potential interactions’ International Seminar on ATC Contributions to Fuel Economy’, Institute of Air Navigation Services, Luxembourg, 2628 October 1982.Google Scholar
10Gamier, J. L. (1982). Nouveaux equipements de bord (PMS, FMS) et systeme ATC: evolution ou revolution. Navigation, 29, no. 16 (October).Google Scholar
11Drew, A. E., Hunt, B. A. and Logan, H. K. (1983). The departure runway capacity at Heathrow Airport II, July 1982. Civil Aviation Authority, CAA Paper 83013, London, August 1983.Google Scholar
12Drew, A. E. and Logan, H. K. (1980). ‘Arrival runway capacity and arrival delays at London Heathrow Airport, Summer 1980.’ Civil Aviation Authority, CAA Paper 81014, London, December 1980.Google Scholar
13Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1982). ‘Integrated dynamic aircraft control for flight economy. Encyclopedia of Systems Control, Pergamon Press. Also Eurocontrol Report 822042, December 1982.Google Scholar
14Völckers, U. (1983). System ”COMPAS” fur einen rationelleren Anflugverkehr. DFVLR-Nachrichten, Heft 39, Braunschweig, FRG, Juni 1983.Google Scholar
15Schwarzott, W. P. and Volckers, U. (1983). The German Concept COMPAS (Computer Oriented Metering Planning and Advisory System). Paper presented at the Eurocontrol Specialist Panel on Automatic Conflict Detection and Resolution (SPACDAR), Brussels, September 1983.Google Scholar
16Gamier, J. L. (1981). Les grandes régions terminales. Problémes opérationnels, évolution possible des solutions. Navigation, 29, no. 116 (October).Google Scholar
17 ten Have, J. M. and Schrier, D. (1983). Computer assisted departure and arrival planning in the Netherlands SARP system. Paper presented at the Eurocontrol Specialist Panel on Automatic Conflict Detection and Resolution (SPACDAR), Brussels, September 1983.Google Scholar
18 Ord, G. (1983). Concepts for a future system of air traffic management and control in the South-East of the United Kingdom. Paper presented at the Eurocontrol Specialist Panel on Automatic Conflict Detection and Resolution (SPACDAR), Brussels, September 1983.Google Scholar
19Fossard, M., Imbert, A. J. and Comes, N. (1979). Gestion à moyen terme du traffic ae’rien en zone de convergence. IFAC/IFORS Symposium proceedings, Toulouse, 6—8 March 1979.Google Scholar
20Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1982). Dynamic control of inbound flights for minimum cost operation. AGARD Conference Proceedings no. 340, Air Traffic Control in Face of User's Demand and Economy Constraints, Lisbon, 15 October 1982. Also Eurocontrol Report 822041, September 1982.Google Scholar
21 Control of the inbound traffic in a Zone of Convergence. Eurocontrol EEC Report No. 161, April 1983.Google Scholar
22Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1983). Cost-efficient control of inbound flights: individual and global aspects. Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Control and Identification. International Association of Science and Technology for Development, IASTED, Copenhagen, 28 June—1 July 1983.Google Scholar
23 Attwooll, V., Bennett, L., Benoît, A. Maggs, R. and Swierstra, S. Collection and presentation of a sample of air traffic reflecting present ATC operation in a high-density zone of convergence (Zone of London including and surrounding Heathrow and Gatwick airports). CAA/Eurocontrol Report (in preparation). Eurocontrol Report 832030, December 1983 (interim version).Google Scholar
24 Attwooll, V., Bennett, L., Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. Comparison of three inbound control procedures in an extended area including and surrounding London main airports. CAA/Eurocontrol Report (in preparation). Eurocontrol Report 832027 (interim version).Google Scholar
25 Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1981). Introduction of a smooth cruise-to-descent transition for application in a zone of convergence. Eurocontrol Report 812019, July 1981.Google Scholar
26Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1980). A minimum fuel transit procedure for the control of inbound flights. Eurocontrol Report 802006, April 1980.Google Scholar
27Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1980). Impact of minimum cost and fuel conservation policies on the selection of cruise/descent speed profiles. Eurocontrol Report 802006, March 1980.Google Scholar
28Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1981). The control of cruise—descent profiles. Experiments using B-737 and Airbus flight simulators. Eurocontrol Report 812020, August 1981.Google Scholar
29Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1982). The dynamic control of inbound flights. Experiments conducted on the Sabena DC-10 flight simulator. Eurocontrol Report 822028, June 1982.Google Scholar
30Benoît, A., Garcia, C. and Swierstra, S. (1983). Ground-air coordinated control of time of arrival. Part 1: integration of cruise and en-route descent (tests conducted using airlines’B-737, A-300, and DC-10 flight simulators). Eurocontrol Report 832028, December 1983.Google Scholar
31Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1980). On-line assessment of 4-d trajectory prediction techniques (OLEVAT-I). Eurocontrol Report 802009, February 1980.Google Scholar
32Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S., Conduct of the final approach phase of a flight in a ZOC environment. Eurocontrol Report(in preparation).Google Scholar
33 Maggs, R. An analysis of the influence of ‘Buffer time ‘in the potential fuel benefits of an advanced system for sequencing arriving traffic. Civil Aviation Authority, London. (Report in preparation).Google Scholar
34Benoît, A. and Swierstra, S. (1982). Available tools for the prediction, control and economy assessment of flight profiles. International Seminar on ATC Contributions to Fuel Economy, Institute of Air Navigation Services, Luxembourg, 26—28 October 1982. Also Eurocontrol Report 822033, September 1982.Google Scholar
35Knox, C. E. and Cannon, D. G. (1980). Development and test results of a flight management algorithm for fuel-conservative descents in a time-based metered traffic environment. NASA Technical paper 1717, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665, U.S.A., October 1980.Google Scholar
36Benoît, A.,& Swierstra, S. (1982). A ground/air coordinated control procedure for minimum-cost operation over an extended area. Proceedings of the Technical Conference, Today and Tomorrow — mini and micro-computers in airline operations, held at the Royal Aeronautical Society, London, October 1982. Also Eurocontrol Report 822036, September 1982.Google Scholar
37 The impact of meteorology on aircraft operating efficiency — a discussion. This Journal, 37, 125, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Benoît, A. (1971). Applicability of t h e EROCOA Trajectory Prediction Module to Actual Scheduled Flights. Eurocontrol Report 722016, September 1971.Google Scholar
39Bisiaux, M., Cox, M., Forrester, D. A. and Storey, J. T. (1982). Possible improvements in meteorology for aircraft navigation. Proceedings of the International Congress of the Institutes of Navigation on Integrated Navigation Actual and Potential, Paris, 21—24 September 1982. Also Eurocontrol Report 822043, November 1982.Google Scholar
40Khan, Mohammadi (1983). Gestion automatisé du traffic aerien sur un ensemble d'aéroports. Ecole Nationale Supérieure de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espce, Thèse de Docteur Ingénieur, no. 81.Google Scholar
41Attwooll, V. W. (1974). Aircraft characteristics and air traffic systems. This Journal, 27, 173.Google Scholar