Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T13:43:59.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Black-Grey-White Detention-based Lists of Flags to Black-Grey-White Casualty-based Lists of Categories of Vessels?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2008

Thomas Degré*
Affiliation:
(INRETS The French National Institute for Transport and Safety Research)

Abstract

The Paris Memorandum of Understanding (Paris MoU) establishes each year in its annual report the traditional “Black-Grey-White” lists of flags. These tables are based on processed performances of flags over a 3-year period, showing the full spectrum between quality flags and flags with a poor performance. The performance of each flag is calculated by the Paris MoU on the basis of inspected and detained ships flying the considered flag, using binomial calculus. Furthermore, black listed flags are one of the criteria, among others, used by the Paris MoU for targeting vessels for their inspections. Using the same binomial calculation method as mentioned above but considering casualties instead of detentions and a multivariate approach instead of considering the flag only, it is possible to extend the Black-Grey-White lists of flags of the Paris MoU based on detentions, to Black-Grey-White lists of categories of vessels with regard to their observed casualties for a given period.

At the time when a correspondence group has been set up by the Sub-Committee on Flag State Implementation of IMO for defining “objectives, framework of mechanisms and methodology for a study on the combination of casualty and Port State Control related data”, this paper has the ambition to provide a valuable contribution to the group in discussions on the case for the necessity of combining casualty data and PSC related data with a view to complement current processing of flag State performance and the targeting criteria for ships inspections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Degré, T. 2007. The use of risk concept to characterize and select High Risk Vessels for ship inspections. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Vol.6, N°1, April 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degré, T. & Muller, O. 2006. The use of risk concept to contribute to the design of a risk index and to characterize and select High Risk Vessels. MarNIS Interim Technical Research Report, August 2006Google Scholar
DNV, 2003. Risk analysis and evaluation criteria used by Recognized Organizations. DNV paper No. 2003-P010, September 2003.Google Scholar
FSI 15, 2007. FSI 15/18 report. Risk assessment comparison between maritime casualties and port State control inspectionsGoogle Scholar
ISL, 2001. Shipping Statistics Yearbook 2001. ISL (Institute of Shipping Economics & Logistics)Google Scholar
Knapp, S. 2007. The econometrics of maritime safety. Recommendations to enhance safety at sea. Thesis the ERASMUS University Rotterdam, Pulic Defense held in January 2007.Google Scholar
MLC, 2006. The ILO's Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. Text of the convention at http://www.ilo.org/Google Scholar
Paris MoU, 2006. New Inspection Regime of the Paris MoU. Internal Report of Paris MoU on Port State Contro TF 31, NIR Version 0.7Google Scholar
Paris MoU annual report, 2006. Paris Memorandum of Understanding annual report 2006. Annual report 2006 on Port State Control.Google Scholar