Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T07:18:59.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The En Route Alternate and a Rational Basis for Contingency Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Extract

When airline fuel is calculated before flight, ‘contingency fuel’ has been included either separately or in combination in various forms over the years. The primary calculation has always been the fuel required in expected conditions to fly to the destination and thence to a nominated alternate. The next is the provision, in the words of the Air Navigation Order, of a ‘safe margin of fuel’ for contingencies. For aircraft operated under an Air Operator's Certificate, CAP 360 specifies ‘an allowance for contingencies such as errors in forecast winds and temperatures, navigational errors and ATC restrictions on altitude and route’. Also, ‘45 minutes holding reserve’ is stated to be a normally overriding requirement. The wording of CAP 360 is, perhaps intentionally, not precise but is broadly in line with Annex 6 of the ICAO Chicago Convention which requires:

(i) a reserve ‘to provide for contingencies’ plus, for turbojet aircraft,

(ii) 30 minutes' low level holding, plus

(iii) an amount ‘to provide for the increased consumption on the occurrence of any of the potential contingencies specified…’

Type
Marine Traffic Studies
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)