Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:54:56.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Egocentric Leisure Boat Navigation in a Smartphone-based Augmented Reality Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2018

Thomas Porathe  and
Jonas Ekskog
Thomas Porathe*
Affiliation:
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
Jonas Ekskog
Affiliation:
(Combitech AB)
*
(E-mail: thomas.porathe@ntnu.no)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines the results of a project to develop and test an augmented reality smart phone application (‘app’) to aid the safety of navigation of leisure sailors with limited navigational skills. The app works in two modes: in the ‘turned off mode’ the app gives an alarm 30 seconds before the boat is predicted to ground. The navigator then immediately stops the boat, picks up the phone and, uses the app to view the surrounding water where NoGo areas less than 3 metres in depth are outlined in red. By panning the smart phone around, safe escape routes with deep water are visible. The prototype app was tested on a group of boat owners in western Norway with very good results, both from technical and usability perspectives. This report outlines the concept of operation of the app, details some of the difficulties encountered in its development and testing, specifies the issues that remain to be resolved to turn the concept into an effective system, and outlines future development plans.

Keywords

e-NavigationUser-friendlyErgonomicsHuman Computer Interface (HCI)
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 71 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 1299 - 1311
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berntsen, V. (2017). Fatal accidents with leisure craft (Dødsulykker Fritidsfartøy). The 2017 Leisure Boat Conference.Google Scholar
Crosbie, J. W. (2006). Lookout Versus Lights: Some Sidelights on the Dark History of Navigation Lights. The Journal of Navigation, 59, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hadnett, E. (2008). A bridge too far? The Journal of Navigation, 61, 283–289.Google Scholar
Hitra-Froya (2016). New grounding today, Ny grunnstøtting idag. http://www.hitra-froya.no/nyheter/2016/07/30/Ny-grunnst%C3%B8ting-i-dag-13110445.ece. [Acc. 2018.02.28]Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (1989). Provisional Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) (NAV 35/WP.31989), London: IMO.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2015). Guideline on Software Quality Assurance and Human-Centred Design for e-Navigation. MSC.1/Circ.1512.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html [Accessed 28 February 2018]Google Scholar
International Union of Marine Insurance (IUMI). (2017). Report on World Merchant Fleet and World Trade. http://www.iumi2017.com/pdf/programme/sep18/1120-1300_Workshop_Facts_Figures/1120-1150_Don_Harrell/11_Mr_Don_Harrell_PP.pdf [Acc. 2018.02.28]Google Scholar
Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB). (2014). Report on the investigation of the grounding of Ovit in the Dover Strait on 18 September 2013. London, MAIB.Google Scholar
Norwegian Society for Sea Rescue. (2017). East county boaters are the ones that most often run aground (Østfoldinger går oftest på grunn). https://www.ntbinfo.no/pressemelding/ostfoldinger-gar-oftest-pa-grunn?publisherId=89422&releaseId=15715694 [Acc. 2018.02.28]Google Scholar
Porathe, T. (2006). 3-D Nautical Charts and Safe Navigation. Dissertation. Malardalen University Press. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:120506/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Acc. 2018.02.28]Google Scholar
Porathe, T. (2016). Information Design in Nautical Charts: Dynamic NoGo Areas. Information Design Journal, 22(2), 82–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Smith, M. W., Akerstrom-Hoffman, R. A., Pizzariello, C. M., Siegel, S. I., Schreiber, T. E. and Gonin, I. M. (1995). Human Factors Evaluation of Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS). New London, CT: United States Cost Guard Research and Development Center.Google Scholar