During the first years of the last war the navigational problem was how to get to the target at all. In such conditions solutions to the navigation problem are priceless. Towards the end of the war it came to be accepted that, in transport operations at least, guidance to destination was almost a matter of course. Navigational performance ceased to be regarded as a question of success or failure and became a question of efficiency. This development in air transport we owed most of all to the radio compass.

As the volume of civil traffic grew, it rapidly became clear that the major limitation on navigational efficiency of air transportation was (and it still is) air traffic control. Although there has been considerable interest in the optimum trajectory particularly in connection with turbine aircraft, the development of refined operating techniques has been damped by restrictions on their application by A.T.C. The flat assertion by some would-be supersonic aircraft manufacturers that the supersonic (unlike the subsonic) jet will not take NO for an answer from A.T.C. once it is committed to a flight programme has recently been a most valuable stimulus.

The A.T.C. problem is well known. It is generally accepted that the capacity of an air space depends on the quality of navigational data, of the data link between aircraft and control centre and of the data correlation capabilities of the centre.