Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T21:17:19.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Operational Research into Marine Traffic and Collisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Extract

There is an urgent need, both at international and national level, for more operational research into marine traffic and the associated collision casualties. At the present time marine traffic research is in its infancy and official analysis of collision is on a national basis with few attempts to correlate the two together and on an international basis. Without this basic information and research on the traffic and accident pattern, it will not be possible to plan effectively to reduce the high cost of collision casualties to ships' operators and to make the necessary improvements in safety over the next decade. This decade will see increasing carriage of dangerous cargoes in bulk, a continual large increase in the number of pleasure boats and the current trend of increasing numbers of merchant ships, fishing and other work-boats will probably continue. Due to this large increase and the trend to mammoth ships, the effective amount of sea space is being rapidly reduced and traffic control is inevitable in some areas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Parker, E. (1962). Trafficometry. Traff. Engn. & Control 1962, 4, (6), 318–23.Google Scholar
2Vickers, T. K. (1967). Navigation of V/STOL aircraft in high-density urban areas. This Journal, 14, 390.Google Scholar
3Rolt, L. T. C. (1955). Red for danger. John Lane, The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
4Kimball, R. L. and Shepard, J. R. (1962). Marine traffic control in the Panama Canal. This Journal, 15, 52.Google Scholar
5Wepster, A. (1967). Collisions in W. European rivers. This Journal, 20, 12Google Scholar
6Beattie, J. H. (1966). Collision in European waters, Appendix I to the Working Group Report on the Separation of Traffic at Sea. This Journal, 19, 436.Google Scholar
7Beattie, J. H. (1960) Operational experience relating to collision prevention, a paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Ausschuss für Funkortung, Kiel, September 1960.Google Scholar
8Sohnke, F. (1964). Routing in the North Sea. This Journal, 17, 386.Google Scholar
9Beattie, J. H. (1963). Locality of collisions and shipping density. Appendix C to the Working Group Report on Traffic Regulation in the Dover Strait. This Journal, 16, 15.Google Scholar
10 This Journal, 16, 1.Google Scholar
11Fricker, J. (1968). Bomber Command. Flying Review International, 23, No. 25.Google Scholar
12Beattie, J. H. (1962). The safety of navigation in inland waterways in Europe. This Journal, 15, 49.Google Scholar
13Parker, E. and Page, L. S. Le (1949). Operational factors and operational yields. This Journal, 2, 95.Google Scholar
14Oudet, L. (1965). Collision and the courts. This Journal, 18, 196.Google Scholar
15Oudet, L. (1968). The black flood: lessons of the Torrey Canyon. This Journal, 21, 41.Google Scholar
16Beattie, J. H. (1964). North Sea Nemedri routes—a collision problem. This Journal, 17, 243Google Scholar
17Board of Trade (1968). The Safety Performance of United Kingdom Airline Operators—Special Review. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar