Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:37:55.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental Diseases Peculiar to Certain Cultures: A Survey of Comparative Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

P.-M. Yap
P.-M. Yap*
Affiliation:
Mental Hospital, Hong Kong University of Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Modern psychiatry has developed in Western Europe, largely under French and German aegis, and latterly in the United States. It is pertinent to ask, since it deals with human behaviour in all its variety, if the concepts, working principles and empirically derived conclusions of psychiatry possess universal validity, wherever it might be practised. As one instance of the influence of cultural environment on psychiatric symptomatology (and also psychiatric practice), we may point to the “hysterogenic points “so often found in French hysterics by the Salpêtrière school of neurologists, who could provoke an hysterical attack or sometimes abort one by pressing on these points. Just across the Channel in England, among English hysterics, these phenomena could not be reproduced; they were, of course, special features of the disease, exhibited only in the atmosphere created by Charcot and his colleagues at that period. The psychiatrist in cultures farther removed from the civilization of Western Europe may well have reason to pause and ask if the principles and practice of orthodox psychiatry possess the same degree of truth or usefulness elsewhere than in Western Europe or America.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 97 , Issue 407 , April 1951 , pp. 313 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1951 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mead, M. (1948), Lancet, 21.Google Scholar
2. Ackerknecht, E. H. (1943), Bull. Hist. of Med., 14, 30.Google Scholar
3. Kraepelin, E. (1904), Zentralbl. f. Nervenheilk. u. Psychiat., 27, 433.Google Scholar
4. Jaspers, K. (1928), Allgeneriae Psychopathologie. (French translation, Paris.) Google Scholar
5. Malinowski, B. (1938), Human Affairs. Ed. Cattell, R. B. London.Google Scholar
6. Seligman, C. G. (1935), Psychology and Modern Problems. Ed. Hadfield, J. A. London.Google Scholar
7. Wegrocki, H. J. (1939), J. Abnorm. and Social Psychol., 34, 166.Google Scholar
8. Delisle Burns, C. (1933), The Horizons of Experience. London.Google Scholar
9. Osterreich, K. (1930), Possession, Demoniacal and Other. London.Google Scholar
10. Yandell, D. W. (1881), Brain, 4, 339.Google Scholar
11. Schuler, E. A., and Parenton, U. J. (1943), J. Social Psychol., 17, 221.Google Scholar
12. Bychowski, G. (1943), J. Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 97, 310.Google Scholar
13. Wulfften-Palthe, P. M. van (1936), Text-book of Tropical Medicine, by de Langen, C. D. and Lichtenstein, A. Batavia.Google Scholar
14. Idem., Op. cit., Chapter on Latah.Google Scholar
15. Winiarz, W., and Wielawski, J. (1936), Psychoanal. Rev., 23, 181.Google Scholar
16. Czaplicka, M. A. (1914), Aboriginal Siberia. Oxford. P. 309, f. Google Scholar
17. Repond, A. (1940), Ann. Méd-Psychol., 98, 311.Google Scholar
18. Musgrave, W. E., and Sison, A. G. (1910), Philippine J. Sc., 5, 335 (B).Google Scholar
19. Natoli, A. (1937), Gior. Ital. de Clin. Trop., 1, 20.Google Scholar
20. Scheube, B. (1903), Diseases of Warm Countries. 3rd Ed. London. P. 514, f. Google Scholar
21. Kraepelin, E. (1909), Psychiatrie, Bd. I. 8th Ed. Google Scholar
22. Beard, (1880), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 7, 487.Google Scholar
23. Brill, A. A. (1913), Ibid., 40, 518.Google Scholar
24. Howard, R. (1910), J. Trop. Med., 13, 269.Google Scholar
25. Loon, F. H. G. van (1927), J. Abnorm. Psychol., 21, 434.Google Scholar
26. Carothers, J. C. (1947), J. Ment. Sci., 93, 549.Google Scholar
27. Irving Hallowel, A. (1934), J. Abnorm. and Social Psychol., 29, 1.Google Scholar
28. Klineberg, O. (1935), Race Differences. New York.Google Scholar
29. Benedict, R. F. (1934), J. Genet. Psychol., 10, 59.Google Scholar
30. Fortune, R. (1932), The Sorcerers of Dobu. London.Google Scholar
31. Cannon, W. B. (1942), Amer. Anthrop., 44, 169.Google Scholar
32. Jung, C. G., and Welhelm, R. (1942), The Secret of the Golden Flower. London.Google Scholar
33. Irving Hallowel, A. (1938), Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 8, 329.Google Scholar
34. Gordon, H. L. (1933). J. Ment. Sci., 79, 712.Google Scholar
35. Kao, C. C., Ting, T., and Hsu, E. H. (1939). Neuropsychiatry in China. Ed. by Lyman, R. S. Peking.Google Scholar
36. Laubscher, B. I. F. (1937), Sex, Custom and Psychopathology. London.Google Scholar
37. Storch, A. (1924), The Primitive, Archaic Forms of Inner Experience and Thought in Schizophrenia. Washington.Google Scholar
38. Burstin, J. (1935). Schizophrénie et Mentalité Primitive. Paris.Google Scholar
39. Freud, S. (1946), Civilization and Its Discontents. London.Google Scholar
40. Malinowski, B. (1927), Sex and Repression in Savage Society.Google Scholar
41. La Barre, Weston (1946), Psychiatry, 9, 375.Google Scholar
42. Neustatter, W. L. (1940), Early Treatment of Nervous and Mental Disorders. London.Google Scholar
43. Hyde, R. W., and Kingsley, L. U. (1944). The New England J. Med., 231, 543–48.Google Scholar
44. Dai, B. (1941). Am. Sociol. Rev., 16, 686.Google Scholar
45. Idem (1943), Asia, 43, 616.Google Scholar
46. Tao, L. K. (1934). Essays Presented to C. G. Seligman. Ed. by Prichard, Evans et al. London.Google Scholar
47. Chou, S. K., and Mi, C. Y. (1937). J. Social Psychol., 8, 155.Google Scholar
48. Shen, E. (1936), Ibid., 7, 471.Google Scholar
49. Pai, T., Sung, S. M., and Hsu, E. H. (1937), Ibid., 8, 47.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.