Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T02:24:22.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Serum Lipoproteins of Mentally Retarded Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. Stern
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Fountain Hospital, London, S.W.17
W. H. P. Lewis
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Fountain Hospital, London, S.W.17

Extract

Because of the importance of the serum lipids in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, much information is available on the serum lipoproteins of adults in health and disease (Adlersberg et al., 1955; Chapin, 1956; Dangerfield and Smith, 1955; Jencks et al., 1956; Kanabrocki et al., 1958). The lipoproteins in childhood have been studied less extensively. Rafstedt (1955) has reported lipid and lipoprotein values for normal infants and children. More recently, Salt and Wolff (1957) have found that paper electrophoresis of the lipoproteins is of value in a number of diseases of infancy and childhood involving lipid metabolism primarily or secondarily. These authors detected abnormalities in the serum lipoproteins in gargoylism and the severe form of hypercalcaemia of infancy, conditions associated with mental defect. Using the ultra-centrifuge, Simon et al. (1954) had earlier demonstrated an increase in the level of certain low density lipoproteins in patients with mongolism, and work in this department (Stern and Lewis, 1957, 1958a) indicated that lipid metabolism is disturbed in children with mongolism and some other mentally retarded children. Paper electrophoresis was chosen as the method for a further study of the serum lipids in mental deficiency. Of particular interest was the possible relation of abnormalities in the serum lipoproteins to the disturbance responsible for the mental defect.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlersberg, D., Bossak, E. T., Sher, I. H., and Sobotka, H., Clin. Chem., 1955, 1, 18.Google Scholar
Berg, J. M., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1959, 52, 789.Google Scholar
Chapin, M. A., J. Lab. clin. Med., 1956, 47, 386.Google Scholar
Dangerfield, W. G., and Smith, E. B., J. clin. Path., 1955, 8, 132.Google Scholar
Gottgried, S. P., Pope, R. H., Friedman, N. H., Akerson, I. B., and DiMauro, S., Clin. Chem., 1955, 1, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jencks, W. P., Hyatt, M. R., Jetton, M. R., Mattingly, T. W., and Durrum, E. L., J. clin. Invest., 1956, 35, 980.Google Scholar
Kanabrocki, E. L., Kaplan, E., Kinnory, D. S., Imperato, A. L., Berry, J. E., and Baker, L. A., Clin. Chem., 1958, 4, 382.Google Scholar
Rafstedt, S., Acta paediat. (Stockh.), 1955, 44, Suppl. 102.Google Scholar
Salt, H. B., and Wolff, O. H., Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 1957, 32, 404.Google Scholar
Simon, A., Ludwig, C., Gofman, J. W., and Crook, G. H., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1954, 111, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, M. W., in Glick, D., Methods of Biochemical Analysis, 1955, Vol. 2. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Stern, J., and Lewis, W. H. P., J. ment. Deficiency Res., 1957, 1, 96.Google Scholar
Iidem, ibid., 1958a, 2, 59.Google Scholar
Iidem, 1958b. In preparation.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.