Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T00:45:32.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite Element Analysis of Screw-Plate Systems for Fixation of Parasymphyseal Fractures of the Mandible

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Scott T. Lovald ,
Tariq Khraishi ,
John Wood ,
Jon Wagner ,
Bret Baack  and
James Kelly
Scott T. Lovald*
Affiliation:
Manufacturing Engineering Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Tariq Khraishi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
John Wood*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Jon Wagner*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Bret Baack*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
James Kelly*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
*
*Graduate Research Assistant
**Associate Professor
***Professor
**Associate Professor
**Associate Professor
****Research Professor
Get access

Abstract

Finite Element Modeling was used to compare the efficacy of common screw-plate configurations used for fixation of parasymphyseal fractures of the mandible. Measures of Von Mises stress on the screw bone interface, as well as principal strain in the reduced fracture region, were used in this comparison. This study also explored differences between orthotropic and isotropic modeling practices and compared the effect of mastication forces on both the fractured and intact halves of the mandible. The results of this analysis showed no major differences between configurations from a mechanistic point of view. This suggests that the use of any of the studied screw-plate configurations will not increase chances for post-operative complications. Furthermore, little difference is seen between analyses with either orthotropic or isotropic material properties. The inclusion of orthotropic properties can thus be avoided in future studies with similar boundary and plating conditions. Mastication ipsilateral to the fracture increases Von Mises stress 2 to 4 times, and should be avoided during early healing periods. These recommendations only apply to patients whose fractures mimic the finite-element model.

Keywords

MandibleFractureParasymphysealFixation.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wade, A. and Wagner, J., “A Retrospective Review of the Effect of Delayed Versus Acute Treatment of Mandibular Fractures at a University Teaching Hospital,” Technical Report, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (2003).Google Scholar
2.Andersen, K. L., Mortensen, H. T., Pedersen, E. H. and Melsen, B., “Determination of Stress Levels and Profiles in the Periodontal Ligament by Means of an Improved Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model for Various Types of Orthodontic and Natural Force Systems,” Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 13, pp. 293–303 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Tanaka, E., Tanne, K. and Sakuda, M., “A Three Dimensional Finite Element Model of the Mandible Including the TMJ and its Application to Stress Analysis in the TMJ During Clenching,” Med. Eng. Phys., 16, pp. 316–322(1994).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chaudhary, N., Lovald, S., Wagner, J., Khraishi, T., Kelly, J. and Wood, J., “Modeling of Screw-Plate Systems for Mandibular Fracture Repair,” Proceedings of the ASME IMECE2004 Conference, Bioengineering Division, Paper #62256. Anaheim, California 11/13/04-11/19/04(2004).Google Scholar
5.Cox, T., Kohn, M. W. and Impelluso, T., “Computerized Analysis of Resorbable Polymer Plates and Screws for the Rigid Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61, pp. 481–487 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Lovald, S. T., Khraishi, T., Wagner, J., Baack, B., Kelly, J. and Wood, J., “Comparison of Plate-Screw Systems used in Mandibular Fracture Reduction: Finite Element Analysis,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, in press (2006).Google Scholar
7.Fernandez, J. R., Gallas, M., Burguera, M. and Viano, J. M., “A Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Mandible Fracture Reduction with Screwed Miniplates,” Journal of Biomechanics, 36, pp. 329–337 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Korioth, T. W. P. and Versluis, A., “Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of the Jaws and their Related Structures by Finite Element Analysis,” Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., 8, pp. 90–104(1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Daegling, D. J. and Hylander, W. L., “Experimental Observation, Theoretical Models, and Biomechanical Inference in the Study of Mandibular form,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 112, pp. 541–551 (2000).3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Schwartz-Dabney, C. L. and Dechow, P. C., “Variations in Cortical Material Properties Throughout the Human Dentate Mandible,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 120, pp. 252–277 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Korioth, T. W. P., Romilly, D. P. and Hannam, A. G., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis of the Dentate Human Mandible,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, pp. 69–96 (1992).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Martens, M., Van Audekercke, R., Delport, P., De Meester, P. and Mulier, J. C., “The Mechanical Characteristics of Cancellous Bone at the Upper Femoral Region,” Journal of Biomechanics, 16, pp. 971–983 (1983).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Craig, R. G. and Peyton, F. A., “Elastic and Mechanical Properties of Human Dentin,” J.D. Res., 37, pp. 710–718(1958).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Hart, R. T., Hennebel, V. V., Thongpreda, N., Van Buskirk, W. C. and Anderson, R. C., “Modeling the Biomechanics of the Mandible: A Three Dimensional Finite Element Study,” Journal of Biomechanics, 25, pp. 261–286 (1992).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Tanne, K., Sakuda, M. and Burstone, C. J., “Three Dimensional Finite Element Analyses for Stress in the Periodontal Tissue by Orthodontic Forces,” American Journal Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop, 92, pp. 499–505 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Toms, S. R. and Eberhardt, A. W., “A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of the Periodontal Ligament Under Orthodontic Tooth Loading,” Am J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 123, pp. 657–665 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Introduction to ANSYS 8.0, Training Manual, 1st Ed., SAS IP, me. (2003).Google Scholar
18.Tate, G. S., Ellis, E. III and Throckmorton, G., “Bite Forces in Patients Treated for Mandibular Angle Fractures,” Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 54, pp. 734–736 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Gray, H., Gray's Anatomy, 15th Ed., Barnes and Noble Books (1995).Google Scholar
20.Schilli, W., Mandibular Fractures. In: Prein, J., Manual of Internal Fixation in the Cranio-Facial Skeleton, Springer-Verlag. Berlin, pp. 57–94 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Tada, S., Stegaroiu, R., Kitamura, E., Miyakawa, O. and Kusakari, H., “Influence of Implant Design and Bone Quality on Stress/Strain Distribution in Bone around Implants: A 3-dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 18, pp. 357–368 (2003).Google ScholarPubMed
22.Wagner, A., Krach, W., Schicho, K., Undt, G., Ploder, O. and Ewers, R., “A 3-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis Investigating the Biomechanical Behavior of the Mandible and Plate Osteosynthesis in Cases of Fractures of the Condylar Process,” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 94, pp. 678–686 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.An, Y. H., “Mechanical Properties of Bone,” Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface, CRC Press LLC, pp. 41–59 (2000).Google Scholar