Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:17:33.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Study on Direct Displacement-Based Seismic Design of RC Columns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Y.-Y. Lin ,
K.-C. Chang  and
Y.-L. Wang
Y.-Y. Lin*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, National Chiayi University, Chiayi, Taiwan 600, R.O.C.
K.-C. Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
Y.-L. Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
*Assistant Professor
**Professor
***Graduate student
Get access

Abstract

For performance-based seismic engineering of buildings, the direct displacement-based seismic design method is different from the coefficient method used in FEMA-273 and the capacity spectrum method adopted in ATC-40. The method not only is a linear static procedure but also is applied to the design of new constructions. This paper concerns with experimental studies on the accuracy of the direct displacement-based design procedure. Experimental results of three reinforced concrete (RC) columns designed by the displacement procedure are presented and discussed through pseudo-dynamic tests and cyclic loading tests. From the tests, it is shown that the stiffness degrading factor of RC columns plays a key role. The direct displacement-based seismic design method can reliably capture the maximum displacement demand of the test RC columns if the stiffness degrading factor adopted in the displacement design method for RC material is adequate.

Keywords

Direct displacement-based seismic designExperimental studyPseudo-dynamic testCyclic loading testRC columns
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Seaoc, “Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Building,” Structural Engineering Association of California, Sacramento, California (1995).Google Scholar
2.Chandler, A. M. and Lam, T. K., “Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Engineering: A Multidisciplinary Review,” Engineering Structures, 23(12), pp. 1525–1543 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), “Nehrp Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings,” Rep. FEMA 273 (Guidelines) and Rep. 274 (Commentary), Washington, D.C. (1997).Google Scholar
4. Applied Technology Council (ATC), “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building,” Rep. ATC-40, Redwood City, California (1996).Google Scholar
5.Moehle, J. P., “Displacement-Based Design of R/C Structures Subjected to Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, 8(3), pp. 403–427 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kowalsky, M. J., Priestley, M. J. N. and MacRae, G. A., “Displacement-Based Design, a Methodology for Seismic Design Applied to SDOF Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Rep. SSRP-94/16, Structural System Research Project, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (1994).Google Scholar
7.Calvi, G. M. and Kingsley, G. R., “Displacement-Based Seismic Design of MDOF Bridge Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(9), pp. 1247–1266 (1995).Google Scholar
8.Wallace, J. W., “Seismic Design of RC Structural Walls, Part I: New Code Format,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 121(1), pp. 75–100 (1995).Google Scholar
9.Priestley, M. J. NKowasky, M. J. and Ranzo, G., “Preliminary Development of Direct Displacement-Based Design for MDOF Systems,” Proceedings of the 65th Annual Convention, SEAOC, Maui, Hawaii (1996).Google Scholar
10.Priestley, M. J. N., “Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1), pp. 157–192 (1997).Google Scholar
11.Priestley, M. J. N. and Kowasky, M. J., “Direct Displacement-Based Seismic of Concrete Buildings,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(4), pp. 421–442 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sasani, M. and Anderson, J. G., “Displacement-Based Design versus Force-Based Design for Structural Walls,” Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico (1996).Google Scholar
13.Bachmann, H. and Dazio, A., “A Deformation-Based Seismic Design Procedure for Structural Wall Buildings,” Proceeding of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the next Generation of Codes, pp. 159–170 (1997).Google Scholar
14.Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., “Direct Displacement-Based Design: Use of Inelastic vs. Elastic Design Spectra,” Earthquake Spectra, 17(1), pp. 47–64 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lin, Y. Y., Tsai, M. H. and Chang, K. C., “Displacement-Based Seismic Design for Buildings,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 25(1), pp. 89–98 (2002).Google Scholar
16.Lin, Y. Y., Hwang, J. S. and Chang, K. C., “Direct Displacement-Based Design for Buildings with Passive Energy Dissipation Systems,” Engineering Structures, 25(1), pp. 25–37 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M., “Inelastic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Earthquake Motions,” ACI Journal, 71(12), pp. 604–610 (1974).Google Scholar
18.Shibata, A. and Sozen, M., “Substitute Structure Method for Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 102(ST1), pp. 1–18 (1976).Google Scholar
19.Rosenblueth, E. and Herrera, I., “On a Kind of Hysteretic Damping,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 90, pp. 37–48 (1964).Google Scholar
20.Iwan, W. D. and Gates, N. C., “Estimating Earthquake Response of Simple Hysteretic Structures,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 105(EM3), pp. 391–405 (1979).Google Scholar
21.Takeda, T., Sozen, M. and Nielson, N., “Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 96, pp. 2557–2573 (1970).Google Scholar
22. American Concrete Institute (ACI), “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI) and Commentary,” ACI 318R-95, Farmingoton Hills, Michigen (1995).Google Scholar
23. Applied Technology Council (ATC), “Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations,” Rep. ATC-32, Redwood City, California (1996).Google Scholar
24.Priestley, M. J. N., Verma, R. and Xiao, Y., “Seismic Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 120(8), pp. 2310–2329 (1994).Google Scholar
25.Liu, H., “Pseudo-Dynamic Tests of Low-Rise Metal Structures,” Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo (1990).Google Scholar