Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:14:13.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrasonic study of liquid-quenched sulfur from room temperature to 200 °C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Akira Doi ,
Satoru Kariya  and
Hiroaki Kamioka
Akira Doi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya 466, Japan
Satoru Kariya
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Nagoya 466, Japan
Hiroaki Kamioka
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu 501-11, Japan
Get access

Abstract

When liquid S is heated above 159 °C, the S8 rings (which are the dominant structural units below this temperature) break open and polymerize into helical chains (S∞). Therefore, samples quenched from liquids at temperatures above or below 159 °C would be different in various properties by the difference in the amount of S∞. The present ultrasonic study of liquid-quenched S in the temperature range from room temperature to 200 °C has revealed this difference. It has been demonstrated that ultrasonics is as powerful as a conventional thermal analysis in dealing with the variation of a material with increasing temperature, even though both techniques were found to be relatively insensitive to the polymerization process.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 12 , December 1994 , pp. 3170 - 3173
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Meyer, B., Chem. Rev. 76, 367 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Tompson, C. W. and Gingrich, N. S., J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1578 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Bacon, R. P. and Fanelli, R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 65, 639 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Pryor, A. W. and Richardson, E. G., J. Phys. Chem. 59, 14 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Vacher, R., Sapriel, J., and Boissier, M., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 2855 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Boissier, M., Vacher, R., and Perrin, B., J. Phys. (Paris) Colloq. 611, C6–42 (1981).Google Scholar
7Saunders, G. A., Yogurtcu, Y. K., Macdonald, J. E., and Pawley, G. S., Proc. R. Soc. London A 407, 325 (1986).Google Scholar
8Kleppa, J., J. Chem. Phys. 18, 1303 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kowalski, W., Z. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig) 220, 5309 (1962).Google Scholar
10Timrot, D. L., Serednitskaya, M. A., and Chkhjkvadze, T. D., Dok. Akad. Nauk SSSR [Sov. Phys. Dokl.] 279, 617 (1984).Google Scholar
11Hoshino, H. and Endo, H., Z. Phys. Chem. 156, 501 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Doi, A., Hayakawa, H., and Kamioka, H., Phys. Rev. B 47, 14136 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Doi, A., Hayakawa, H., and Kamioka, H., Solid State Ionics 68, 81 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Doi, A., Kawasaki, G., and Itoh, Y., Solid State Ionics (1994, in press).Google Scholar
15Sakka, S. and Mackenzie, J. D., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 6, 145 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Ward, A. T., J. Phys. Chem. 72, 4133 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar