Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:04:47.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural evolution, mechanical profile, and fracture morphology of aluminum matrix composites containing graphene nanoplatelets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Mahmood Khan
Affiliation:
Composite Research Centre, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Maham Amjad
Affiliation:
Composite Research Centre, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Ansa Khan
Affiliation:
Composite Research Centre, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
Rafi Ud-Din
Affiliation:
Materials Division, Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Nilore 45650, Pakistan
Iftikhar Ahmad
Affiliation:
Deanship of Scientific Research, Advanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Tayyab Subhani*
Affiliation:
Composite Research Centre, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: tayyab.subhani@ist.edu.pk
Get access

Abstract

Aluminum matrix composites were prepared by powder processing route containing three different loadings of graphene nanoplatelets, i.e., 1 wt%, 3 wt%, and 5 wt%. Ball milling of composite powders was performed to ensure the uniform dispersion of nanoplatelets in aluminum powder, followed by their consolidation to near theoretical densities. Microstructural evolution after composite preparation was witnessed by X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy, while the mechanical property profile was evaluated by hardness, compression, and flexural tests. The mechanical properties of composites containing 5 wt% nanoplatelets were found with maximum improvements in hardness, compression, and flexural strengths of 35%, 433%, and 283%, respectively. This increase in mechanical performance is related to uniform dispersion and microstructural development in composites by incorporating nanoplatelets. Fractographic characterization indicated a change in fracture morphology from matrix-dominant in pure aluminum to nanoplatelet-dominant in composites. In particular, shearing and pull out of nanoplatelets were observed during the fracture of composites with simultaneous restricted plastic deformation of the surrounding aluminum matrix.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Chen, X-H. and Yan, H.: Fabrication of nanosized Al2O3 reinforced aluminum matrix composites by subtype multifrequency ultrasonic vibration. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2197 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, S. and Xie, J.: Tensile properties and strengthening mechanisms of SiC p-reinforced aluminum matrix composites as a function of relative particle size ratio. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2047 (2013).Google Scholar
Hanabe, M. and Aswath, P.: Al2O3/Al particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composite by displacement reaction. J. Mater. Res. 11, 1562 (1996).Google Scholar
Michael Rajan, H.B., Ramabalan, S., Dinaharan, I., and Vijay, S.J.: Synthesis and characterization of in situ formed titanium diboride particulate reinforced AA7075 aluminum alloy cast composites. Mater. Des. 44, 438 (2013).Google Scholar
Lloyd, D.: Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites. Int. Mater. Rev. 39, 1 (1994).Google Scholar
Shirvanimoghaddam, K., Hamim, S.U., Karbalaei Akbari, M., Fakhrhoseini, S.M., Khayyam, H., Pakseresht, A.H., Ghasali, E., Zabet, M., Munir, K.S., Jia, S., Davim, J.P., and Naebe, M.: Carbon fiber reinforced metal matrix composites: Fabrication processes and properties. Composites, Part A 92, 70 (2017).Google Scholar
Rawal, S.: Metal–matrix composites for space applications. JOM 53, 14 (2001).Google Scholar
Bakshi, S.R., Lahiri, D., and Agarwal, A.: Carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites—A review. Int. Mater. Rev. 55, 41 (2010).Google Scholar
Gao, X., Yue, H., Guo, E., Zhang, H., Lin, X., Yao, L., and Wang, B.: Preparation and tensile properties of homogeneously dispersed graphene reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater. Des. 94, 54 (2016).Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Lyu, Y., Jiang, A., and Zhao, J.: Fabrication and characterization of aluminum matrix fly ash cenosphere composites using different stir casting routes. J. Mater. Res. 29, 260 (2014).Google Scholar
Latief, F.H., Sherif, E-S.M., Almajid, A.A., and Junaedi, H.: Fabrication of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets-reinforced aluminum composites and evaluating their mechanical properties and corrosion behavior. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 92, 485 (2011).Google Scholar
Yan, S.J., Dai, S.L., Zhang, X.Y., Yang, C., Hong, Q.H., Chen, J.Z., and Lin, Z.M.: Investigating aluminum alloy reinforced by graphene nanoflakes. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 612, 440 (2014).Google Scholar
Tian, W-m., Li, S-m., Wang, B., Chen, X., Liu, J-h., and Yu, M.: Graphene-reinforced aluminum matrix composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater. 23, 723 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, I., Islam, M., Subhani, T., and Zhu, Y.: Characterization of GNP-containing Al2O3 nanocomposites fabricated via high frequency-induction heat sintering route. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 24, 4236 (2015).Google Scholar
Ahmad, I., Islam, M., Abdo, H.S., Subhani, T., Khalil, K.A., Almajid, A.A., Yazdani, B., and Zhu, Y.: Toughening mechanisms and mechanical properties of graphene nanosheet-reinforced alumina. Mater. Des. 88, 1234 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastwros, M., Kim, G-Y., Zhu, C., Zhang, K., Wang, S., Tang, X., and Wang, X.: Effect of ball milling on graphene reinforced Al6061 composite fabricated by semi-solid sintering. Composites, Part B 60, 111 (2014).Google Scholar
Rashad, M., Pan, F., Tang, A., and Asif, M.: Effect of graphene nanoplatelets addition on mechanical properties of pure aluminum using a semi-powder method. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 24, 101 (2014).Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Xu, C., Xiao, W., Ameyama, K., and Ma, C.: Enhanced mechanical properties of Al5083 alloy with graphene nanoplates prepared by ball milling and hot extrusion. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 658, 8 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolshina, L.A., Muradymov, R.V., Korsun, I.V., Yakovlev, G.A., and Smirnov, S.V.: Novel aluminum–graphene and aluminum–graphite metallic composite materials: Synthesis and properties. J. Alloys Compd. 663, 449 (2016).Google Scholar
Ipekoglu, M., Nekouyan, A., Albayrak, O., and Altintas, S.: Mechanical characterization of B4C reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by squeeze casting. J. Mater. Res. 1, 599 (2017).Google Scholar
Ghazaly, A., Seif, B., and Salem, H.G.: Mechanical and tribological properties of AA2124-graphene self lubricating nanocomposite. In Light Metals 2013 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2013); p. 411.Google Scholar
Zakharchenko, K.V., Annalisa, F., Los, J.H., and Katsnelson, M.I.: Melting of graphene: From two to one dimension. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 202202 (2011).Google Scholar
Liu, J., Khan, U., Coleman, J., Fernandez, B., Rodriguez, P., Naher, S., and Brabazon, D.: Graphene oxide and graphene nanosheet reinforced aluminium matrix composites: Powder synthesis and prepared composite characteristics. Mater. Des. 94, 87 (2016).Google Scholar
Alam, S.N. and Kumar, L.: Mechanical properties of aluminium based metal matrix composites reinforced with graphite nanoplatelets. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 667, 16 (2016).Google Scholar
Tabandeh-Khorshid, M., Omrani, E., Menezes, P.L., and Rohatgi, P.K.: Tribological performance of self-lubricating aluminum matrix nanocomposites: Role of graphene nanoplatelets. Eng. Sci. Technol., Int. J. 19, 463 (2016).Google Scholar
Sharma, V., Prakash, U., and Kumar, B.V.M.: Surface composites by friction stir processing: A review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 224, 117 (2015).Google Scholar
Hu, Z., Tong, G., Lin, D., Chen, C., Guo, H., Xu, J., and Zhou, L.: Graphene-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites–A review. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 930 (2016).Google Scholar
Bartolucci, S.F., Paras, J., Rafiee, M.A., Rafiee, J., Lee, S., Kapoor, D., and Koratkar, N.: Graphene–aluminum nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 7933 (2011).Google Scholar
Pérez-Bustamante, R., Bolaños-Morales, D., Bonilla-Martínez, J., Estrada-Guel, I., and Martínez-Sánchez, R.: Microstructural and hardness behavior of graphene-nanoplatelets/aluminum composites synthesized by mechanical alloying. J. Alloys Compd. 615(Suppl. 1), S578 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Fan, G., Guo, Q., Li, Z., Su, Y., and Zhang, D.: Synergistic strengthening effect of graphene–carbon nanotube hybrid structure in aluminum matrix composites. Carbon 95, 419 (2015).Google Scholar
Rashad, M., Pan, F., Tang, A., Asif, M., Hussain, S., Gou, J., and Mao, J.: Improved strength and ductility of magnesium with addition of aluminum and graphene nanoplatelets (Al + GNPs) using semi powder metallurgy method. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 23, 243 (2015).Google Scholar
Bonollo, F., Molinas, B., Tangerini, I., and Zambon, A.: Diametral compression testing of metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Technol. 10, 558 (1994).Google Scholar
Karbalaei Akbari, M., Baharvandi, H.R., and Shirvanimoghaddam, K.: Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminum alloy composites. Mater. Des. 66(Part A), 150 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S.E. and Bae, D.H.: Deformation behavior of aluminum alloy matrix composites reinforced with few-layer graphene. Composites, Part A 78, 42 (2015).Google Scholar