Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:03:38.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heat transfer coefficient of porous copper with homogeneous and hybrid structures in active cooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2013

Zhu Xiao*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, United Kingdom; andSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yuyuan Zhao*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: y.y.zhao@liv.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Heat transfer coefficients of porous copper samples with single- and double-layer structures, fabricated by the lost carbonate sintering process, were measured under forced convection conditions using water as the coolant. Compared with the empty channel, introducing a porous copper sample enhanced the heat transfer coefficient 5–8 times. The porous copper samples with double layers of porosities of 60% and 80% often had lower heat transfer coefficients than their single layer counterparts with the same overall porosities because the coolant flowed predominantly through the high-porosity layer. For the same double-layer structure, the order of the double layer had a large effect on the heat transfer coefficient. Placing the high-porosity layer next to the heat source was more efficient than the other way around. The predictions of a segment model developed for the heat transfer coefficient of multilayer structures agreed well with the experimental results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sertkaya, A.A., Altinisik, K., and Dincer, K.: Experimental investigation of thermal performance of aluminum finned heat exchangers and open-cell aluminum foam heat exchangers. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 36, 86 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, W., Zhao, C.Y., and Tassou, S.A.: Thermal analysis on metal-foam filled heat exchangers. Part I: Metal-foam filled pipes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 2751 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C.Y., Lu, W., and Tassou, S.A.: Thermal analysis on metal-foam filled heat exchangers. Part II: Tube heat exchangers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 2762 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, P.X., Li, M., Lu, T.J., Yu, L., and Ren, Z.P.: Experimental research on convection heat transfer in sintered porous plate channels. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 2085 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C.Y., Kim, T., Lu, T.J., and Hodson, H.P.: Thermal transport in high porosity cellular metal foams. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 18, 309 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H.Y., Pinjala, D., Wong, T.N., and Joshi, Y.K.: Development of liquid cooling techniques for flip chip ball grid array packages with high heat flux dissipations. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 28, 127 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, K., Poulikakos, D., and Zwick, F.: Metal foams as compact high performance heat exchangers. Mech. Mater. 35, 1161 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.Y., Fung, T., Zhang, L.P., and Zhang, F.L.: Lost carbonate sintering process for manufacturing metal foams. Scr. Mater. 52, 295 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thewsey, D.J. and Zhao, Y.Y.: Thermal conductivity of porous copper manufactured by the lost carbonate sintering process. Phys. Status Solidi A 205, 1126 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L.P. and Zhao, Y.Y.: Fabrication of high melting-point porous metals by lost carbonate sintering process via decomposition route. J. Eng. Manuf. 222, 267 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, M.M.: Manufacturing, testing, and modeling of copper foams. Global J. Pure Appl. Sci. 0212, 5 (2012).Google Scholar
Parvanian, A.M. and Panjepour, M.: Mechanical behavior improvement of open-pore copper foams synthesized through space holder technique. Mater. Des. 49, 834 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Mullen, D., Lynn, K., and Zhao, Y.: Heat transfer performance of porous copper fabricated by the lost carbonate sintering process, in Architectured Multifunctional Materials, edited by Brechet, Y., Embury, J.D., and Onck, P.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1188, Warrendale, PA, 2009).Google Scholar
Moffat, R.J.: Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 1, 3 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybbs, A. and Edwards, R.V.: A new look at porous media fluid mechanics–Darcy to turbulent, in Fundamentals of Transport in Phenomena Porous Media, Vol. 82, Bear, J. and Corapciolgu, M.Y. eds.; NATO ASI Ser. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherland, 1984, p. 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C.K. and Webb, S.W.: Gas Transport in Porous Media (Springer, Albuquerque, NM, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incropera, F.P., Dewitt, D.P., Bergman, T.L., and Lavine, A.S.: Principles of Heat and Mass Transfer (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013), p. 154.Google Scholar