Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T17:33:12.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication of porous Al2O3 ceramics by rapid gelation and mechanical foaming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2013

Yan Yang
Affiliation:
R&D Center for Structural Ceramics and Composites, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
Shunzo Shimai
Affiliation:
R&D Center for Structural Ceramics and Composites, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
Yi Sun
Affiliation:
R&D Center for Structural Ceramics and Composites, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
Manjiang Dong
Affiliation:
R&D Center for Structural Ceramics and Composites, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
Hidehiro Kamiya
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Bio-Applications and Systems Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 183-8538, Japan
Shiwei Wang*
Affiliation:
R&D Center for Structural Ceramics and Composites, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: swwang51@mail.sic.ac.cn
Get access

Abstract

Porous Al2O3 ceramics were fabricated using a rapid gelation to fix the foam structure after mechanical foaming. The slurry was made with deionized water, Al2O3 powder, a water-soluble copolymer of isobutylene and maleic anhydride, and a surfactant. The resultant gel formed at room temperature in air. The influence of the surfactant (EMAL TD) content on gelling behavior, pore structure (porosity, cell size), shrinkage behavior, and compressive strength of the resultant porous Al2O3 ceramics was evaluated. Porous Al2O3 ceramics were sintered in only one step without debinding because of the low concentration of additives (≤0.5 wt%). The porous Al2O3 ceramics had porosities from 20 to 89% and cell sizes from 60 to 220 μm. The compressive strength was 75 MPa when the porosity was 60%.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Park, J.K., Lee, J.S., and Lee, S.I.: Preparation of porous cordierite using gelcasting method and its feasibility as a filter. J. Porous Mater. 9(3), 203210 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggio-Woyansky, J., Scott, C.E., and Minnear, W.P.: Processing of porous ceramics. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 71(11), 16741682 (1992).Google Scholar
Kim, H., Lee, S., Han, Y., and Park, J.K.: Preparation of dip-coated TiO2 photocatalyst on ceramic foam pellets. J. Mater. Sci. 41(18), 61506153 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuta, S., Katsuki, H., and Komarneni, S.: Modification of porous silica with activated carbon and its application for fixation of yeasts. J. Porous Mater. 8(1), 4348 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanaro, L., Jorand, Y., Fantozzi, G., and Negro, A.: Ceramic foams by powder processing. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18(9), 13391350 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepulveda, P., Ortega, F.S., Innocentini, M.D.M., and Pandolfelli, V.C.: Properties of highly porous hydroxyapatite obtained by the gelcasting of foams. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83(12), 30213024 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hing, K.A.: Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: Influence of porosity and chemistry. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2(3), 184199 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., Jiang, D., and Tan, S.: The control of slurry rheology in the processing of reticulated porous ceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 37(3), 541553 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Y.S., Son, G., Suh, J., and Kim, K.T.: Densification and grain-growth of porous alumina compacts. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77(12), 31373141 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, S., Fricke, J., and Löbmann, P.: Electrical properties of PZT aerogels. J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 22(7), 11551161 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepulveda, P.: Gelcasting foams for porous ceramics. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 76(10), 6165 (1997).Google Scholar
Sepulveda, P. and Binner, J.G.P.: Processing of cellular ceramics by foaming and in situ polymerisation of organic monomers. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19(12), 20572066 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omatete, O.O., Janney, M.A., and Strehlow, R.A.: Gelcasting – a new ceramic forming process. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70(10), 16411649 (1991).Google Scholar
Takeshita, M. and Kurita, S.: Development of self-hardening slip casting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 415419 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, X.J., Shimai, S.Z., Dong, M.J., and Wang, S.W.: Gelcasting of alumina using epoxy resin as a gelling agent. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(3), 986988 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, H.X., Fan, Z., Evans, J.R.G., and Busfield, J.J.C.: Microstructure of ceramic foams. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 20(7), 807813 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Shimai, S.Z., and Wang, S.W.: Room temperature gelcasting of alumina with a water-soluble co-polymer. J. Mater. Res. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2013.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzenbach, U.T., Studart, A.R., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Ultrastable particle-stabilized foams. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 35263530 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhakaran, K., Melkeri, A., Gokhale, N.M., and Sharma, S.C.: Preparation of macroporous alumina ceramics using wheat particles as gelling and pore forming agent. Ceram. Int. 33(1), 7781 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brezny, R. and Green, D.J.: The effect of cell size on the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 25172526 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar