Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T08:28:15.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation and Failure of Zr57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 Bulk Metallic Glass Under Quasi-static and Dynamic Compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. C. Hufnagel ,
T. Jiao ,
Y. Li ,
L-Q. Xing  and
K. T. Ramesh
T. C. Hufnagel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
T. Jiao
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Y. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
L-Q. Xing
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
K. T. Ramesh
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access

Abstract

We have examined the mechanical behavior of Zr57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 bulk metallic glass under uniaxial compression at strain rates from 10−4to 3 × 103 s−1. The failure stress decreases with increasing strain rate, and shear-band formation remains the dominant deformation mechanism. A consideration of basic properties of adiabatic shear bands makes it appear unlikely that shear bands formed under quasi-static loading are adiabatic; in the dynamic case, the time scales of deformation and thermal conduction are similar, indicating that a more sophisticated calculation is required. In the dynamic tests, however, high-speed cinematography reveals evidence that the mechanism of failure involves an adiabatic component.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , June 2002 , pp. 1441 - 1445
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Johnson, W.L., MRS Bull. 24(10), 42 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bruck, H.A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L., Scr. Metall. 30, 429 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bruck, H.A., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L., J. Mater. Res . 11, 503 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gilbert, C.J., Ritchie, R.O., and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 476 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lowhaphandu, P. and Lewandowski, J.J., Scr. Mater. 38, 1811 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Flores, K.M. and Dauskardt, R.H., Scr. Mater. 41, 937 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Coates, R.S. and Ramesh, K.T., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 145, 159 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ravichandran, G. and Subhash, G., Int. J. Solids Struct. 32, 2627 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Flores, K.M. and Dauskardt, R.H., J. Mater. Res. 14, 638 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Donovan, P.E. and Stobbs, W.M., Acta Metall. 29, 1419 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Bai, Y.L. and Dodd, B., Adiabatic Shear Localization: Occurrence, Theories and Applications (Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1992).Google Scholar
12.Wunderlich, R.K., Ettl, C., and Fecht, H-J., Int. J. Thermophys. 22, 579 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Gilbert, C.J., Ager, J.W. III, Schroeder, V., Ritchie, R.O., Lloyd, J.P., and Graham, J.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 3809 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Owen, D.M., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L., in Bulk Metallic Glasses, edited by Johnson, W.L., Inoue, A., and Liu, C.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 554, Warrendale, PA, 1999), p. 419.Google Scholar