Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T00:20:58.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Addition of Nb2O5 on the electrical properties of buried resistors in low-temperature cofired ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ching-Tai Cheng
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratories, ITRI, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040, Republic of China
Jiang-Tsair Lin
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratories, ITRI, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040, Republic of China
Hong-Ching Lin
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratories, ITRI, Hsinchu, Taiwan 31040, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

Nb2O5 was added to buried resistors for low-temperature cofired ceramics, and the electrical properties of the resultant resistors were examined. Remarkable increases in electrical resistivity and attractive decreases in the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) were observed by the addition of Nb2O5, which was attributed to the high solubility of Nb2O5 into the PbO-SiO2-Al2O3 matrix glass. With higher dissolved contents of Nb2O5 into the glass, the resistivity of buried resistors increased by approximately six-fold magnitude, while TCR decreased substantially toward zero. It was indicated that the conductance for these buried resistors was limited by tunneling of charge carriers through the thin glass layer penetrating into the ruthenium-oxide agglomerates. A larger separation observed between RuO2 particles due to high solubility of Nb2O5 in the glass increased the charging energy (E) and lump term (Rbo), which in turn gave rise to a higher resistivity and a lower TCR value.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K., and Uhlmann, D.R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1976), Chap. 10, pp. 507513.Google Scholar
2.Sutterlin, R.C., Dayton, G.O., and Biggers, J.V., in IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids, Manuf. Technol., CHMT-18B, 346 (1995).Google Scholar
3.Yang, P., Rodriguez, M.A., Kotula, P., Miera, B.K., and Dimos, D., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 4175 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.His, C.S., Chen, D.F., Shieh, F.M., and Fu, S.L., Mater. Chem. Phys. 78, 67 (2002).Google Scholar
5.Rodriguez, M.A., Yang, P., Kotula, P., and Dimos, D., J. Electroceramics 5, 217 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Inokuma, T. and Taketa, Y., Active Passive Elec. Comp. 12, 155 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hayakawa, K., Sato, T., Smith, J.D., and William, B., Japanese Patent No. 06–045102 (1994).Google Scholar
8.Ishigame, S., Japanese Patent No. 04–291901 (1992).Google Scholar
9.Jean, J.H. and Gupta, T.K., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 1575 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kingery, W.D., Niki, E., and Narasimhan, M.D., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 44, 29 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Chiou, B.S., Hsu, W.Y., and Duh, J.G., IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids, Manuf. Technol. 15, 393 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Pike, G.E. and Seager, C.H., J. Appl. Phys. 48, 5152 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Inokuma, T., Taketa, Y., and Haradome, M., in IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids, Manuf. Techno., CHMT–7, 166 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar