Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T20:43:47.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radical settlements to conflict: Conflict management and its implications for institutional change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

Wesley S. Helms  and
Christine Oliver
Wesley S. Helms*
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing, International Business & Strategy, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Christine Oliver
Affiliation:
Schulich School of Business, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Corresponding author: whelms@brocku.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper theorizes that conflict management strategies influence radical settlements in institutional fields. Radical settlements are truces to conflict reached between field constituents that significantly change constituents’ relations and their institutional context. We develop theory on the concept of radical settlements by introducing a typology of conflict management strategies that predicts variance in the likelihood of a radical settlement in institutional fields. We ground this typology within a framework of two key antecedents – ideological salience and field polarization – proposed to influence conflict management strategies. Our paper provides new insights to the literature on conflict and institutional change by shedding new light on the counter-intuitive phenomenon of conflict settlement or cessation as a catalyst for change within institutional fields.

Keywords

conflict managementsettlementinstitutional change
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 471 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, M. (2011). The (il)logics of federal budgeting, and why crisis must come. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 345–348.Google Scholar
Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040.Google Scholar
Balzarova, M., & Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78–108.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 491–518). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (2003). Private politics. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12(1), 31–66.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1430–1453.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, M. P. (1984). Social control from below. In D. Black (Ed.), Toward a general theory of social control, vol. 1: Fundamentals (pp. 303–345). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Curhan, J. R. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 279.Google Scholar
Belaya, V., & Hanf, J. H. (2009). A multi-theoretical perspective on power in managing interorganizational relationships. International Journal of Social Economics, 36(11), 1040–1049.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1998). The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (1991). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bres, L. (2013). Membership strategies in pluralistic organizations: The case of ISO 26000. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, pp. 1076–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheldelin, S., Greenberg, M., Honeyman, C., & Volpe, M. R. (2003). Intractable conflict from the bottom up. Negotiation Journal, 19(1), 65.Google Scholar
Child, J., Rogrigues, S. B., & Tse, K. K.-T. (2012). The dynamics of influence in corporate co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1246–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, V., & Jennings, D. V. (1997). Talking about the natural environment: A means for deinstitutionalization? The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 454–464.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (1993). Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 755–798.Google Scholar
Cooter, R., Marks, S., & Mnookin, R. (1982). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: A testable model of strategic behavior. The Journal of Legal Studies, 11(2), 225–251.Google Scholar
Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, P., Farmer, J., & Thomson, E. (2011). The power of stories to persuade: The storying of midwives and the financial narratives of central policy makers. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(2), 146–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitch, C., & Hegewisch, A. (2013). Title VII sex and race discrimination litigation settlements as opportunities for organizational change. Journal of Business & Psychology, 28(4), 425–438.Google Scholar
De Luca, G., & Sekeris, P. G. (2012). Land inequality and conflict intensity. Public Choice, 150, 119–135.Google Scholar
den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.Google Scholar
den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. G. A., & de Haan, P. (2010). The sequential patterning of tactics: Activism in global sports apparel industry, 1988–2002. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(11/12), 648–666.Google Scholar
Dennis, M. (2012). Chicago and the little steel strike. Labor History, 3(2), 167–204.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1977). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, G. M. (2015). The story of Kellogg Co. versus the National Biscuit Company: Breakfast with Brandeis. Retrieved January 22, 2015 from http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=graeme_dinwoodie.Google Scholar
DiStefano, T. (1984). Interorganizational conflict: A review of an emerging field. Human Relations, 37(5), 351–366.Google Scholar
Dolfsma, W., & McMaster, R. (2011). Policy conflicts: Market-oriented reform in health care. Journal Of Economic Issues, 45(2), 309–316.Google Scholar
Durand, R., Rao, H., & Monin, P. (2007). Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 455–472.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N., & Thomas, P. (2004). The discourse of globalization and the globalization of discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 379–396). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Farjoun, M. (2002). The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 848–874.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (1992). A poststructuralist perspective on the third dimension of power. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(1), 31–38.Google Scholar
Foley, T. (2007). Environmental conflict resolution: Relational and environmental attentiveness as measures of success. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(4), 485–504.Google Scholar
Friedman, R., Liu, W., Chen, C. C., & Chi, S. S. (2007). Causal attribution for interfirm contract violation: A comparative study of Chinese and American commercial arbitrators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 856–864.Google Scholar
Fuentelsaz, L., & Gomez, J. (2006). Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 454–479.Google Scholar
Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196–214.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, J. (2012). High seas hijinks. Maclean’s, 125(20), 46–47.Google Scholar
Gold, R. (2008). Chevron is cleared over Nigeria killings. Wall Street Journal – Eastern Edition, 252(130), A4.Google Scholar
Graham, J. L., Mintu, A. T., & Rodgers, W. (1994). Explorations of negotiation behaviors in ten foreign cultures using a model developed in the United States. Management Science, 40(1), 72–95.Google Scholar
Gray, B., Coleman, P., & Putnam, L. (2007). Intractable conflict: New perspectives on the causes and conditions for change. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1415–1429.Google Scholar
Gray, B., & Stites, J. P. (2011). In search of integrative logics: Reframing the climate change debate. Strategic Organization, 9(1), 85–90.Google Scholar
Green, S. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R.Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management journal, 49(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2010). Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178.Google Scholar
Hardy, C., Palmer, I., & Phillips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53(9), 1227–1248.Google Scholar
Helfen, M., & Sydow, J. ö. (2013). Negotiating as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements. Organization Studies (01708406), 34(8), 1073–1098.Google Scholar
Helms, W. S., Oliver, C., & Webb, K. (2012). Antecedents of settlement on a new institutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1120–1145.Google Scholar
Helms, W. S., & Patterson, K. W. (2014). Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: The positive implications of stigma for MMA organizations. Academy Of Management Journal, 57(5), 1453–1484.Google Scholar
Helms, W. S., & Webb, K. (2014). Perceived voluntary code legitimacy: Towards a theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(3), 287–312.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J., & Ventresca, M. J. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1368–1393.Google Scholar
Honeyman, C. (2001). The wrong mental image of settlement. Negotiation Journal, 17(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
Horst, M., & Irwin, A. (2010). Nations at ease with radical knowledge: On consensus, consensusing and false consensusness. Social Studies of Science, 40(1), 105–126.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 252–266.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20(1), 134–153.Google Scholar
Investor’s Business Daily (2014). New Glaxo bribery inquiries. Investors Business Daily, p. A02.Google Scholar
Jack, W., & Lagunoff, R. (2006). Social conflict and gradual political succession: An illustrative model. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108(4), 703–725.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. (2014). Study: Firms still struggle with corruption, bribery. Compliance Week, 11(126), 48–49.Google Scholar
James, E. H., & Wooten, L. P. (2006). Diversity crises: How firms manage discrimination lawsuits. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1103–1118.Google Scholar
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.Google Scholar
Jonsson, S., Greve, H. R., & Fujiwara-Greve, T. (2009). Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 195–228.Google Scholar
Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2008). Aggression at the service delivery interface: Do you see what I see? Journal of Management and Organization, 14(2), 180–192.Google Scholar
Khavul, S., Chavez, H., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). When institutional change outruns the change agent: The contested terrain of entrepreneurial microfinance for those in poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 30–50.Google Scholar
Kim, P. H., Pinkley, R. L., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Power dynamics in negotiation. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 799–822.Google Scholar
King, M., & Haveman, H. (2008). Antislavery in America: The press, the pulpit and the rise of antislavery societies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 492–528.Google Scholar
Knight, G., & Wells, D. (2007). Bringing the local back in: Trajectory of contention and the union struggle at Kukdong/Mexmode. Social Movement Studies, 6(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–290.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Yang, G., & Graham, J. L. (2006). Tension and trust in international business negotiations: American executives negotiating with Chinese executives. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 623–641.Google Scholar
Lepoutre, J., & Valente, M. (2012). Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 285–313.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (1974). Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178.Google Scholar
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.Google Scholar
Maoz, I., & Eidelson, R. J. (2007). Psychological bases of extreme policy preferences: How the personal beliefs of Israeli-Jews predict their support for population transfer in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(11), 1476–1497.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820.Google Scholar
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262–292.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 68(2), 165–196.Google Scholar
Meyer, R., & Hollerer, M. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1241–1262.Google Scholar
Meyers, A., Brooks, G. R., & Goes, J. B. (1990). Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 93–110.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. (1992). Why negotiations fail: An exploration of barriers to the resolution of conflict. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 8(2), 235–250.Google Scholar
Morrill, C., Zald, M. N., & Rao, H. (2003). Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 391–415.Google Scholar
Munir, K. A. (2005). The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organization Studies, 26(1), 93–112.Google Scholar
Mutlu, C. (2014). Bribery and firm performance in different institutional environments. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, pp. 1166–1170.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1968). The structure of social action. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 355–380.Google Scholar
Rao, H. (1998). Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal Of Sociology, 103(4), 912.Google Scholar
Rao, H., & Kenney, M. (2008). New forms as settlements. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 352–370). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rao, H., & Kumar, S. (1999). Institutional sources of boundary spanning structures: The establishment of investor relations departments in the Fortune 500 industrials. Organization Science, 10(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351–384.Google Scholar
Rotemberg, J. J. (2010). BP’s Macondo: Spill and response. Harvard Business School Cases, 21pp.Google Scholar
Roulet, T. (Forthcoming). What good is Wall Street? Institutional contradiction and the stigma over the finance industry. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
Rubin, J., Pruitt, D., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sauermann, H., & Stephan, P. (2013). Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24(3), 889–909.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. R. (2009). Resource variation and the development of cohesion in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 551–572.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. San Francisco: Sage.Google Scholar
Sebenius, J. K. (1999). Dealing with blocking coalitions and related barriers to agreement: Lessons from negotiations on the oceans, the ozone, and the climate. In K. Arrow, R. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky, & R. Wilson (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 331–347). Cambridge, MA: P.O.N. Books.Google Scholar
Seo, M., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1922). Schulpädagogik. AW Zickfeldt.mel.Google Scholar
Simons, T., & Ingram, P. (1997). Organization and ideology: Kibbutzim and hired labor, 1951–1965. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 784–813.Google Scholar
Spector, B. I., & Wagner, L. M. (2010). Negotiating international development. International Negotiation, 15(3), 327–340.Google Scholar
Spedale, S., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Preservation and dissolution of the target firm’s embedded ties in acquisitions. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1169–1196.Google Scholar
Spicer, A., & Fleming, P. (2007). Intervening in the inevitable: Contesting globalization in a public sector context. Organization, 14(6), 517–541.Google Scholar
Stipanowich, T. J. (2004). ADR and the ‘vanishing trial’: The growth and impact of ‘alternative dispute resolution’. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(3), 843–912.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. L., & Gonzalez, R. (1997). Environmental disputes. Competition for scarce resources and clashing of values. In M.H. Bazerman, D.M. Messick, A.E. Tenbrunsel, & K.A. Wade-Berzoni (Eds.), Environment, ethics, and behavior (pp. 75–104). San Francisco: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troast, J. G., Hoffman, A. J., Riley, H. C., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). Institutions as barriers and enablers to negotiated agreements institutional entrepreneurship and the Plum Creek habitat conservation plan. In A. Hoffman, & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment (pp. 235–261). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.Google Scholar
Van Peursem, K. A., & Balme, A. (2010). Threats to the New Zealand Serious Fraud Office: An institutional perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(3), 304–328.Google Scholar
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Hoffman, A. J., Thompson, L. L., Moore, D. A., Gillespie, J. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002a). Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: The role of values and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Okumura, T., Brett, J. M., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002b). Cognitions and behavior in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison of two cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 87–95.Google Scholar
Weiss, S. E. (2006). International business negotiation in a globalizing world: Reflections on the contributions and future of a (sub) field. International Negotiation, 11(2), 287–316.Google Scholar
Wellington, A. (2011). Exquisite examples of creative judicial dispute resolution: The potential of alternative dispute resolution for intellectual property cases. Intellectual Property Journal, 23(3), 289–326.Google Scholar
Williams, S. (1965). Negotiating investment in emerging countries. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 89–99.Google Scholar
Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present, and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 130–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zahrnt, V. (2009). The discouraging effect of risks in WTO negotiations: Determinants and perceived changes. International Trade Journal, 23(4), 361–398.Google Scholar
Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work and the transformation of an organizational field: Exploring the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 189–221.Google Scholar
Zilber, T. B. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 281–303.Google Scholar