Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T22:35:56.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sound symbolism in Korean1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kong-On Kim
Affiliation:
SWRL Educational Research and Development, Los Alamitos, California

Extract

I. In Korean, alternation between certain vowels or consonants in sound symbolic adjectives and adverbs is regularly correlated with a connotation shift in those words. The examples below illustrate such alternation and the resulting connotation shift: (i) Vowel alternation: /piŋkwl/ ‘(turn) round and round’ /pεŋkwl/ ‘round and round (the circle involved is smaller and the movement faster)’

(2) Consonant alternation: /piŋkwl/ ‘round and round’ /phiŋkwl/ ‘round and round (the movement is more powerful and faster)’ ‘ppiŋkwl/ same as /phiŋkwl/ The alternation between /i/ and /ε/ in the examples in (1) brings about a connotation shift in the speed of the movement and also in the size of the moving object and of the circle made by the circular movement. In the examples in (2), the alternation between the word initial lenis stop /p/ on the one hand, and its aspirated or tense counterpart on the other, signals a connotation shift in the speed and force of the movement, but curiously not in the size of the circle or of the moving object. These means of changing the connotation of words are highly productive in the sense that, given a basic word that belongs to the category of sound symbolic words, native speakers can predict the form and connotation of the paired member resulting from the phoneme alternation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, J. W. (1970). Sequences of vowels in Spanish. LIn I. 129134.Google Scholar
Huh, W. (1965). Korean phonology (in Korean). Revised edition, Seoul: Cengumsa.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. C. (1967). Magnitude symbolism of English words. JVLVB 6. 508511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C.-W. (1973). Adjustment rules in phonology. In Kenstowicz, M. J. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds), Issues in phonological theory. The Hague: Mouton. 130144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1970). An alternative set of vowel shift rules. Working Papers in Phonetics 17. University of California at Los Angeles. 2528.Google Scholar
Langdon, M. (1971). Sound symbolism in human languages. Sawyer, J. (ed.), Studies in American Indian languages, University of California Publications, Linguistics 65. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles & London. 149173.Google Scholar
Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology 45. 5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. (1971). Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Lg 47. 826848.Google Scholar
Reese, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12. 225239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarte, R. D. & Barritt, L. S. (1971). Phonetic symbolism in adult native speakers of English: three studies. L & S 14. 158168.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, I. K. & Taylor, M. (1962). Phonetic symbolism in four unrelated languages. Canadian Journal of Psychology 16, 344356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed