Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:51:04.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some types of ‘phrasal conjunction’ in Russian1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

J. Miller
J. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper some data from Russian are presented and it is suggested, contrary to the proposals put forward by Lakoff & Peters (1966), that in the deep structure of Russian two types of coordination must be recognized, an ‘and’ type and a ‘with’ type. It is also suggested that the underlying ‘with’ coordinating element may sometimes be realized as i (‘and’) or as s (‘with’), and that the s may derive from an underlying ‘comitative’ case (cf. Fillmore, 1968: 81–83).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 55 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. M. (1970a). Dependency and grammatical functions. To appear in FL.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1970b). Towards a Iocalistic theory of case. Cambridge University Press. In press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dik, S. (1968). Coordination. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. (1965). Coordinating conjunctions in English. Lg 41. 260–293. Reprinted in Reibel, D. A. & Schane, S. A. (eds.) (1969). Modern Studies in English. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Peters, S. (1966). Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. (Report No. NSF-I7, pp. VI–I–VI–49, Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Translation) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Computation Laboratory.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1969). Review of Dik (1968). Lingua 22.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The role of semantics in a grammar. In Bach, & Harms, (eds.). Universals in linguistic theory, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1970). On the surface verb ‘remind’. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 37–120.Google Scholar