Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T08:32:58.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

S. Kayne Richard, French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1975. Pp. 473.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Andrew R. Dford
Andrew R. Dford
Affiliation:
Linacre College, Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 118 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aissen, J. (1974). The syntax of causative constructions. PhD diss., Harvard.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1974). The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. Mimeo., Kings College, Cambridge. To appear in Syntax and Semantics.Google Scholar
Evers, A. (1975). The guillotine principle. In A., Kraak (ed.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1972–1973. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. (1972). Analogical rules in syntax. In Peranteau, P. M. et al. (eds), Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, 111–123.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1976). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Mimeo., King's College, Cambridge. To appear in LIn.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1968). Deep and surface grammar. Mimeo., Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1975). The theoretical importance of subject raising. Mimeo. McGill University. To appear in FL.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1974). On raising. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1976). Avoiding reference to subject. LIn. 7. 151–182.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1976). Word order universals and grammatical relations. In Cole, P. & Sadock, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics Vol. VIII: grammatical relations, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1976). On the non-transformational nature of syntax: synchronic and diachronic evidence from Romance causatives. In M., Harris (ed.), Romance syntax: sychronic and diachronic perspectives. University of Salford, 69–95.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1968). Constraints on variables in syntax. Mimeo., Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1975). Clausematiness. In L., Keenan E. (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. (1972). Constraints on movement transformations. JL 8. 35–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (1972). Predicate raising and dative in French and sundry languages. Mimeo., Magdalen College, Oxford.Google Scholar