Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:07:16.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Past tense transportation: a reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

F. R. Palmer
F. R. Palmer
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Huddleston (1977: 43), following some remarks by Poutsma (1926: 441–447), suggests that in (Huddleston's numbering) (1) I could have got the money easily enough there is past tense transportation (PTT), in that the CAN clause has ‘Unreal Mood (marked by the inflection on CAN) and underlying Past Tense’ and that the application of a transformational rule (PTT) allows ‘the Past Tense to be realized in the complement – by HAVE’. He proceeds to argue that the same is true of (5) (i) If he could have swum, [he would certainly have survived].

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 77 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Huddleston, R. (1969). Some observations on tense and deixis in English. Lg 45. 777–806.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1976). An introduction to English transformational syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (1977). Past tense transportation in English. JL 13. 43–52.Google Scholar
Jenkins, L. (1972). Modality in English syntax. M.I.T. dissertation. Reproduced by the Indiana Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Joos, M. (1964). The English Verb: form and meaning. Madison and Milwaukee: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1966). Outline of stratificational grammar. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Poutsma, H. (1926). A grammar of late modern English. Groningen: Noordhoff. Pt. II, Vol. IIB.Google Scholar
Ross, J. C. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. Journal of Philosophical Linguistics 1. 71–162.Google Scholar