Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T14:09:58.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natalia Knoblock (ed.), The grammar of hate: Morphosyntactic features of hateful, aggressive, and dehumanizing discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Pp. xvi + 293.

Review products

Natalia Knoblock (ed.), The grammar of hate: Morphosyntactic features of hateful, aggressive, and dehumanizing discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Pp. xvi + 293.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

RICCARDO GIOMI Open the ORCID record for RICCARDO GIOMI [Opens in a new window]
RICCARDO GIOMI*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, r.giomi@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , November 2023 , pp. 919 - 923
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Barbaresi, Lavinia Merlini. 1994. Morphopragmatics (Trends in Linguistics 76). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 2006. Frames semantics. In Geeraerts, Dirk (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (Cognitive Linguistics Research 34), 373–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M.. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar