Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T03:36:07.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, 1987. Pp. vi+198.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Liliane Haegeman
Liliane Haegeman
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Geneva.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , September 1989 , pp. 484 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1986). Passive. LIn 17. 587–622.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (1984). Aspect, case and thematic structure in English. University College London: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. & Williams, E. (1981). NP-structure. The Linguistic Review I. 171–217.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (1987). The representation of implicit and dethematized subjects. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1988). ‘A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’. LIn 19. 425–450.Google Scholar
Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. MIT: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). Argument, structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1. 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar