Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T10:49:22.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

K. P. Mohanan, The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. Pp. xii + 219.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Edmund Gussmann
Affiliation:
Department of English, Catholic University of Lublin.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1974). The organization of phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. & Sridhar, S. N. (1983). Morphological levels in English and Kannada; or, Atarizing Reagan. In Richardson, J. F., Marks, M. & Chukerman, A. (eds), Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology and syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 316.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Beard, R. (1981). The Indo-European lexicon. A full synchronic theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Lg 48. 633644.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Górska, E. (1982). Formal and functional restrictions on the productivity of word-formation rules. Folia Linguistica 16. 149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1987). Why phonological strata should not include affixation, unpublished MS, MIT.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Mohanan, K. P. (1985). The segmental phonology of Modern English. LIn 16. 57116.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). Stress and the cycle. LIn 18. 4584.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1980). The structure of intonational meaning: evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Malicka-Kleparska, A. (1985). The conditional lexicon in derivational morphology. A study of double motivation in Polish and English. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.Google Scholar
Malicka-Kleparska, A. (1987). English -ing formations: on the border of syntax and morphology. Unpublished MS. Lublin.Google Scholar
Marle, Van J. (1985). On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1982). Lexical Phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics club.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1985). Syllable structure and lexical strata in English. Phonology Yearbook 2. 139155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, J. (1984). Cyclic and lexical phonology. The structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1972). The phonological representation of English inflectional endings. Glossa 6. 117127.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (1986). A non-linear analysis of vowel—zero alterations in Polish. JL 22. 249280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, S. L. (1979). Against boundary distinctions in English morphology. Linguistic Analysis 5. 387419.Google Scholar
Szpyra, J. (1986). The interaction of phonological rules with morphology in Polish and English. Unpublished Ph.D. diss. Lublin. To be published Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Szpyra, J. (1987). The phonology of Polish prefixation. Unpublished MS. Lublin.Google Scholar
Szymanek, B. (1980). Phonological conditioning of word formation rules. Folia Linguistica 14. 413425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanek, B. (1985). English and Polish adjectives. A study in lexicalist word-formation. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar