Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:33:57.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles. Volume One: Categories. Volume Two: The scope, order and distribution of English auxiliary verbs. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983. Vol. One, pp. viii + 294; Vol. Two, v + 258.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Raphael Salkie
Raphael Salkie
Affiliation:
Department of Language Studies, Brighton Polytechnic.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 471 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akmajian, A., Steele, S. & Wasow, T. (1979). The category AUX in universal grammar. LIn 10. 1–64.Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1981). Learnability and the English auxiliary system. In Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J. (eds), The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 296–323.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G., Pullum, G. & Sag, I. (1982). Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Lg 58. 591–638.Google Scholar
Ghinina, St., Nikolova, T. & Sakazova, L. (1972). A Bulgarian text book for foreigners. Sofia: Naouko Izkoustvo.Google Scholar
Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Thomason, R. H. (ed.), Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press. 247–270.Google Scholar
Perkins, M. R. (1982). The core meanings of the English modals. JL 18. 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullum, G. (1982). Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to. Glossa 16. 181–215.Google Scholar
Reuland, E. (1983). Governing -ing. LIn 14. 101–136.Google Scholar
Steele, S., Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Jelinek, E., Kitagawa, C., Oehrle, R. & Wasow, T. (1981). An encyclopedia of AUX: a study in cross-linguistic equivalence. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 5. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar