Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T04:55:01.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 1977. Pp. xix + 620.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Theodora Bynon
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1976). On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 323.Google Scholar
Back, M. (1980). Ergativität und genera verbiim mittelpersischen Präteritum. Vortrag vordem 20. Deutschen Orientalistentag. Ms., Universität Freiburg i.B.Google Scholar
Jeffers, R. J. & Lehiste, Ilse (1979). Principles and met hods for historical linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mimer, G. B. (1973). ‘It is aspect (not voice) which is marked in Samoan’. Oceanic Linguistics 12, 621639.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (ed.) (1979a). Ergativity. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plank, F. (1979b). ‘Ergativity, syntactic typology and univeral grammar: some past and present viewpoints’. In Plank (1979a). 336.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. (1979). ‘On the origins of ergativity’. In Plank (1979a). 385404.Google Scholar