Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:07:22.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale &Richard Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research (Studies in Language Companion Series 166). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. xv + 302.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Steve Nicolle*
Affiliation:
SIL International & Canada Institute of Linguistics
*
Author’s address: Canada Institute of Linguistics, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley BC, V2Y 1Y1Canadasteve_nicolle@sil.org

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think– an English modal particle. In Swan, Toril & Westvik, Olaf Jansen (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 147. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning(ed.). 2001. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 313339. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2011. I thinkand other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49, 295332.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar