Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T09:14:49.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Syllables, moras and accents in Beja

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

R. A. Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics & Linguistics, University College, London

Extract

In his study of Japanese phonology, McCawley introduces an interesting typological classification of languages according to the kinds of rules needed for describing the distribution of prosodic features like stress and pitch (1968: 58–61). Whereas Trubetzkoy had made a simple distinction between ‘syllablecounting’ languages and ‘mora-counting’ languages, McCawley suggests that we should make two independent distinctions:

(a) accordig to the ‘unit of phonological distance’ (the unit in terms of which the location of any accent is calculated) between ‘syllable-counting’ and ‘mora-counting’ languages;

(b) according to the ‘prosodic unit’ (the unit the actually bears the accent) between ‘syllable languages’ and ‘mora languages’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hockett, C. F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Indiana University.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1970). English as a VSO language. Lg 46. 286–99.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of phonology. Tr. Baltaxe, C. A. M.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar