Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T16:20:05.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Kiparsky, Explanation in phonology. (Publications in Language Sciences 4.) Dordrecht: Foris, 1982. Pp. x + 252.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Douglas C. Walker
Douglas C. Walker
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 499 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anttila, R. (1974). Formalization as degeneration in historical linguistics. In Anderson, J. and Jones, C. (eds.), Historical linguistics. Amsterdam; North Holland, 1–32.Google Scholar
Botha, R. P. (1973). The justification of linguistic hypotheses. The Hague; Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, O. (ed.) (1973). Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo; TEC.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1981). Explaining syntactic change. In Lightfoot, D. and Hornstein, N. (eds.), Explanation in linguistics. London; Longman, 209–248.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (eds.) (1982). The structure of phonological representations: I. Dordrecht; Foris Publications.Google Scholar