Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T13:49:15.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Go and Tend the Earth: A Jewish View on an Enhanced World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Consider the thought experiment offered at the conference that generated this collection of essays: in this fantasy, face transplants are safe and effective. A young woman is the victim of a devastating accident. A face transplant will enable her to live a completely normal life. But, say she is African American, or Asian. Would it be ethically permissible to allow her to take the face of a Caucasian woman? Or, say you have a child with a muscle wasting disorder. Would it be permissible to alter his muscle repair system so that he not only does not have the genetic variation that causes the disease, but he has the capacity for enhanced muscular strength, beyond that of his peers, such that he could become a big league pitcher?

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McNeil, D., “Insouciance Recaptured,” New York Times, December 18, 2007, at Health, available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/18/health/research/18face.html?scp=2&sq=face+transplant> (last visited January 23, 2008); Macur, J., “Scientists Move Closer to Reliable H.G.H. Test,” New York Times, December 15, 2007, at Sports, available at <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/15/sports/baseball/15hgh.html?scp=4&sq=human+growth+hormone+baseball> (last visited January 23, 2008).+(last+visited+January+23,+2008);+Macur,+J.,+“Scientists+Move+Closer+to+Reliable+H.G.H.+Test,”+New+York+Times,+December+15,+2007,+at+Sports,+available+at++(last+visited+January+23,+2008).>Google Scholar
Chapman, A. Frankel, M., Designing our Descendents: The Promises and Perils of Genetic Modification (Bethesda, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Peters, T., Playing God?: Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom (Routledge: New York, 1997). Peters is not unique in this nearly ubiquitous use of the term.Google Scholar
See, for example, Chapman, Frankel, , Designing our Descendents; Kass, L., The Beginning of Wisdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006) and Fukamaya, F., The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Avon Books, 2006).Google Scholar
National Human Genome Research Institute, “Genetic Enhancement,” 2000, available at <http://www.genome.gov/10004767> (last visited January 23, 2008).+(last+visited+January+23,+2008).>Google Scholar
Walters, L., speech presented at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, fall 2006.Google Scholar
Churchill, M., Visions of a New Earth, Religious Consultation Report, October 1999, available at <http://religiousconsultation.org/newsletters/October_1999.htm> (last visited January 23, 2008).+(last+visited+January+23,+2008).>Google Scholar
Kass, L., The Beginning of Wisdom (New York: Free Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Peters, T., “Stem Cells: The Scientific Frontier and the Ethical Debate,” presentation at the American Academy of Religion, Washington, D.C., November 2006.Google Scholar
LaFleur, W., “Comments,” Harvard University Forum, Center for World Religions, November 8, 2007.Google Scholar
Brock, D., “Comments,” Harvard University Forum, Center for World Religions, November 8, 2007.Google Scholar
Muller, H. J., “The Guidance of Human Evolution,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 3 (1959): 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, Bleich, J. D., Bioethical Dilemmas: A Jewish Perspective (Southfield, MI: Targum Press, 2006); Dorff, E., a series of books and articles, representatively, Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995); and Mackler, A., Introduction to Jewish and Catholic Bioethics: A Comparative Analysis (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2003). Other scholars include the following: Moshe Tendler, Fred Rosner, Rachel Biale, Rachel Adler, Laurie Zoloth, and Paul Wolpe.Google Scholar
Id. (Bleich), at 134.Google Scholar
Id., at 136–7.Google Scholar
Dorff, E., Love Your Neighbor and Yourself: A Jewish Approach to Modern Personal Ethics (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 2003.)Google Scholar
Mackler, A., “Genetic Enhancement,” in Jews and Genes, submitted for John's Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
E.g., Maimonides, , trans. Pines, S., Guide for the Perplexed I: 1 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963): At 1:23; Rashi, on Genesis 1:26.Google Scholar
Novak, D., Natural Law in Judaism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998): At 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, S., “Jewish Enhancement,” in Zoloth, L. Dorff, E., eds., Jews and Genes, submitted for publication, 2007.Google Scholar
Steinberg, A., “Human Cloning – Scientific, Moral, and Jewish Perspectives,” Torah U'Maddah Journal 9 (2000): 199205.Google Scholar
Glick, S., “Jewish Enhancement,” in Zoloth, L. Dorff, E., eds., Jews and Genes, submitted for publication, 2007.Google Scholar
Gilman, S., The Jew's Body (New York: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
See, for example, the Center for Jewish Genetic Disorders, available at <http://www.jewishgeneticscenter.org/> (last visited January 23, 2008).+(last+visited+January+23,+2008).>Google Scholar
The rabbinic discourse on medicine raises substantively different concerns, and hence, particular responses, than secular ones. Since germ line research has not been the focus of medical questions that have arisen for patients, and since Jewish law is case-driven (i.e., no cases, no responsa), the literature is yet thin. The intent of this work is to direct specific attention to this emerging issue and to stimulate serious inquiry in this direction.Google Scholar
Of importance to note is that Jewish law, unlike American secular law in which something is permitted or prohibited, describes four categories for possible action. An action may be permitted, or unpunishable under the halachic code, but morally undesirable; an action may be permitted and desirable; an action may be prohibited (even if desirable); and an action may be permitted by Jewish law, but prohibited by the secular state (and thus be permitted, since “the law is the law of the land,” or dinah d’malchut dinah.)Google Scholar
In general, unless the act in question involves idolatry, adultery, or murder, any moral gesture can be evaluated, including the permanent alteration of the genome.Google Scholar
Waxman, K., “Creativity and Catharis: A Theological Framework for Evaluating Cloning,” Torah U'Maddah Journal 9 (2000): 188193.Google Scholar
Talmud Balvid Sanhedren 65a.Google Scholar
It is a subject of a current novel by Piercy, M., He, She, and It (New York: Fawcett, 1992). The tales reoccur in the 18th century, and in the texts of the responsa literature (Zevi Ashkenazi, She’elot u-Teshuvot, no. 93). In one such text, the question is raised about whether the Golem can be included in a prayer quorum, minyon. At stake is the issue of murder. If the Golem is a man, then is it not killing to “return him to dust?” (One thinks here of the legal cases involving the destruction of embryos.) The text resolves this in an odd way, not by claiming the humanity or countable status of the Golem, but of decrying the waste of a creature with “a purpose.” Sherwin also comments on this text, and notes that Askenazi's son, Jacob Emden, argues with this distinction. Emden is an important commentator on other issues in medical ethics.Google Scholar
Loike, J., “Is the Human Clone a Golem?” Torah U'Maddah Journal 9 (2000): at 238.Google Scholar
This entire section from Zoloth-Dorfman, L., “Mapping the Normal Human Self,” in Peters, T., ed., Genetics: Issues of Social Justice (Cleveland: Pilgrim Press, 1998.)Google Scholar
Soloveitchik, J., Halachic Man, trans. Kaplan, L. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1983): at 99.Google Scholar
Id., at 99.Google Scholar
See Waxman, , supra note 30, at 191.Google Scholar
Baylonian Talmud, Babba Kamma 85AGoogle Scholar
Bleich, J. D., “Genetic Screening,” Tradition 34, no. 1 (Spring 2000): 6368.Google Scholar
Midrach Rabbah 46.2Google Scholar
See Bleich, , supra note 15.Google Scholar
Glick, S., “Jewish Enhancement,” in Zoloth, L. Dorff, E., eds., Jews and Genes, ed. submitted for publication 2007.Google Scholar
See supra note 20.Google Scholar
M. Nahmanides on Genesis 1:26. Nahmanides understands the plural form of “Let us make man in our image” as God's addressing the earth. The earth is responsible for the body of humans, as it is for the body of all animals, but God is directly responsible for the soul, and so the human is in the image of both. See similarly Sifre Deuteronomy 306.Google Scholar
O. ben Jacob Sforno on Genesis 1:26. On this and other views noted in this paragraph, see also Dorff, E. N., Matters of Life and Death: A Jewish Approach to Modern Medical Ethics (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1998): at 19.Google Scholar
Heschel, A. J., Man Is Not Alone: A Philosophy of Religion (New York: Farrar, Straus and Young, 1951): At 136–44; see also Mackler, A. L., “Symbols, Reality, and God: Heschel's Rejection of a Tillichian Understanding of Religious Symbols,” Judaism 40, no. 3 (Summer 1991): At 294, 290–301.Google Scholar
Leviticus Rabbah 34:3, quoting Genesis 9:6.Google Scholar
Mekhilta Bahodesh, ch. 8, as cited in Zohar, N. J., Alternatives in Jewish Bioethics (Albany: State University of New York, 1997): at 92.Google Scholar