Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-qcsxw Total loading time: 0.233 Render date: 2022-08-17T11:41:37.888Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Informed Trust and the Financing of Biomedical Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Academic medical centers and drug manufacturers have traditionally occupied very distinct positions with regard to public trust. As collaborations among medical researchers and pharmaceutical companies expand, however, worries about the aggressive pursuit of profit that has tarnished the reputation of the pharmaceutical industry may be transferred to medical institutions and clinical investigators, suggesting to some that biomedical research is more about increasing profit than promoting public health. Consequently, when medical institutions forge research collaborations with industry they should be mindful of the potential for these relationships to erode public confidence in the integrity of clinical research.

Recent events have heightened concerns about the financing of clinical research. These include the widely publicized deaths of several research volunteers, scandals at the nation's largest funder of biomedical research, and evidence of fabricated research findings in prominent medical journals. These unfortunate events have prompted many to re-examine strategies for managing industry relationships and the financial conflicts of interest they may create.

Type
JLME Column
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kassirer, J. P., On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005); Angell, M., “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?” N. Engl. J. Med. 342 (2000):1516–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, P. J. “The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science,” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2000): 413–20; Bodenheimer, T., “An Uneasy Alliance: Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry,” N. Engl. J. Med. 342 (2000): 1539–44; Frankel, M. S., “Perception, Reality, and the Political Context of Conflict of Interest in University-Industry Relationships,” Academic Medicine 71 (1996): 1297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmen, I. H., “A Death in the Laboratory: The Politics of the Gelsinger Aftermath,” Molecular Therapy 3 (2001): 425–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrook, R., “Financial Conflicts of Interest and the NIH,” N. Engl. J. Med. 350 (2004): 327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, E. Y. and Loring, J. F., “Beyond Fraud – Stem-Cell Research Continues,” N. Engl. J. Med. 354 (2006): 321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, K., Rakatansky, J., Riddick, F. A. Jr., Morse, L. J., O'Bannon, J. M. III, Goldrich, M. S., Ray, P., Wesiss, M., Sade, R. M., and Spillman, M. A., “Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Conduct of Clinical Trials,” JAMA 287 (2002): 7884; Montaner, J. D., O'shaughnessy, M. V., and Schechter, M. T., “Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research: A Double-Edged Sword,” Lancet 358 (2001): 1893–5; Boyd, E. A. and Bero, L. A., “Assessing Faculty Financial Relationships with Industry,” JAMA 28 (2000): 2209–14; DeAngelis, C. D., Fontanarosa, P. B., and Flanagin, A., Editorial, “Reporting Financial Conflicts of Interest and Relationships between Investigators and Research Sponsors,” JAMA 286 (2001): 89–91; Korn, D., “Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research,” JAMA 284 (2000): 2234–7; Fontanarosa, P. B., Flanagin, A., and DeAngelis, C. D., Editorial, “Reporting Conflicts of Interest, Financial Aspects of Research, and Role of Sponsors in Funded Studies,” JAMA 294 (2005):110–111; Lo, B., Wolf, L. E., and Berkeley, A., “Conflict-of-Interest Policies for Investigators in Clinical Trials,” N. Engl. J. Med. 343 (2000): 1616–20; Moses, H. III and Martin, J. B., “Academic Relationships with Industry: A New Model for Biomedical Research,” JAMA 285 (2001): 933–35; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Financial Relationships and Interests in Research Involving Human Subjects: Guidance for Human Subject Protection,” Federal Register 69 (2004): 26393–26937; Gelijns, A. C. and Thier, S. O., “Medical Innovation and Institutional Interdependence: Rethinking University-Industry Connections,” JAMA 287 (2002): 1398–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrary, S. V., Anderson, C. B., Jakovljevic, J., Khan, T., McCullough, L. B., Wray, N. P., and Brody, B. A., “A National Survey of Policies on Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research,” N. Engl. J. Med. 343 (2000): 1621–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. K., Shohara, R., Schissel, A., and Rennie, D., “Policies on Faculty Conflicts of Interest at US Universities,” JAMA 284 (2000): 2203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. J. “Trust Us to Make a Difference: Ensuring Public Confidence in the Integrity of Clinical Research,” Academic Medicine 76 (2001): 209214; Kelch, R. P., “Maintaining the Public Trust in Clinical Research,” N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (2002): 285–7; Johns, M. M. E., Barnes, M., and Florencio, P. S., “Restoring Balance to Industry-Academia Relationships in an Era of Institutional Financial Conflicts of Interest: Promoting Research While Maintaining Trust,” JAMA 289 (2003): 741–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stossel, T. P., “Regulating Academic-Industrial Research Relationships – Solving Problems of Stifling Progress,” N. Engl. J. Med. 353 (2005): 1060–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, M. and Sharp, R. R., “Restoring and Preserving Trust in Biomedical Research,” Academic Medicine 77 (2002): 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werhane, P. and Doering, J., “Conflicts of Interests and Conflicts of Commitment,” Professional Ethics 4 (1995): 4781; Thompson, D. F., “Understanding Financial Conflicts of Interest,” N. Engl. J. Med. 329 (1993): 573–6; Sollitto, S., Hoffman, S., Mehlman, M., Lederman, R. J., Youngner, S. J., and Lederman, M. M., “Intrinsic Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: A Need for Disclosure,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2003): 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, E. D. and Thomasma, D. C., For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Veatch, R. M., Patient as Partner: A Theory of Human-Experimentation Ethics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Angell, M., The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It (New York: Random House, 2004).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D., “Relationships between Academic Institutions and Industry in the Life Sciences,” N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (1996): 368–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. J. and Siegel, E. K., “Academic Medical Centers and Medical Research: The Challenges Ahead,” JAMA 294 (2005): 1367–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, D., Universities In the Marketplace (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, S., Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2003).Google Scholar
Dresser, R., When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Finkel, M. J., “Should Informed Consent Include Information on How Research is Funded?” IRB 13 (1991): 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, T. and Griener, G., “Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Addressing the Issue of Physician Remuneration,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (2002): 305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Faden, R. R. and Beauchamp, T. L., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
La Puma, J., “Physicians' Conflicts of Interest in Postmarketing Research: What the Public should Know and Why Industry should Tell them,” in Vanderpool, H. Y., ed., The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects: Facing the 21st Century (Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group, 1996): 203219.Google Scholar
Brody, B. A., McCullough, L. B., and Sharp, R. R., “Consensus and Controversy in Clinical Research Ethics,” JAMA 294 (2005): 1411–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinicky, J. K., Edwards, S. S., and Orlowski, J. P., “Conflicts of Interest, Conflicting Interests, and Interesting Conflicts,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 6 (1995): 358–66.Google Scholar
Sugarman, J., McCrory, D. C., Powell, D., Krasny, A., Adams, B., Ball, E., and Cassell, C., “Empirical Research on Informed Consent. An Annotated Bibliography,” Hastings Center Report 29 (1999): S142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Benson, P., and Winslade, W., “False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception,” Hastings Center Report 17 (1987): 20–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, T. M., “Research, Informed Consent and the Limits of Disclosure,” Bioethics 15 (2001): 341363.Google Scholar
Kahn, J. P. and Mastroianni, A. C., “Moving from Compliance to Conscience: Why We Can and Should Improve on the Ethics of Clinical Research,” Archives of Internal Medicine 161 (2001): 925–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Informed Trust and the Financing of Biomedical Research
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Informed Trust and the Financing of Biomedical Research
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Informed Trust and the Financing of Biomedical Research
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *