Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:12:17.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Portable audiometric screening platforms used in low-resource settings: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

A Jayawardena ,
B Waller ,
B Edwards ,
R Larsen-Reindorf ,
J Esinam Anomah ,
B Frimpong ,
A Gina ,
J Netterville ,
J Saunders  and
G J Basura
A Jayawardena
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
B Waller
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
B Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
R Larsen-Reindorf
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Hearing Assessment Center, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
J Esinam Anomah
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Hearing Assessment Center, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
B Frimpong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Hearing Assessment Center, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana
A Gina
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
J Netterville
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
J Saunders
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Hospital, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
G J Basura*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Gregory J Basura, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Otology/Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, 1500 W Medical Center Dr., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA E-mail: gbasura@umich.edu Fax: +1 734 764 0014
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Millions of people across the world suffer from disabling hearing loss. Appropriate interventions lead to improved speech and language skills, educational advancement, and improved social integration. A major limitation to improving care is identifying those with disabling hearing loss in low-resource countries.

Objectives

This review article summarises information on currently available hearing screening platforms and technology available from published reports and the authors’ personal experiences of hearing loss identification in low-resource areas of the world. The paper reviews the scope and capabilities of portable hearing screening platforms, including the pros and cons of each technology and how they have been utilised in low-resource environments.

Conclusion

Portable hearing screening tools are readily available to assess hearing loss in low-resource areas. Each technology has advantages and limitations that should be considered when identifying the optimal methods to assess needs in each country.

Keywords

Auditory Brainstem ResponseHearing LossHearing ScreeningLow- and Middle-Income CountriesOto-Acoustic EmissionsPure Tone Audiometry
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 74 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr G J Basura takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1World Health Organization. WHO global estimates on prevalence of hearing loss, 2012. In: http://www.who.int/deafness/en/ [10 March 2018]Google Scholar
2Olusanya, BO, Neumann, KJ, Saunders, JE. The global burden of disabling hearing impairment: a call to action. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:367–73Google Scholar
3Fagan, JJ, Jacobs, M. Survey of ENT services in Africa: need for a comprehensive intervention. Glob Health Action 2009;2Google Scholar
4Fagan, JJ. Developing world ENT: a global responsibility. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:544–7Google Scholar
5Isaacson, G, Melaku, A. Results of pediatric tympanoplasty on short-term surgical missions. Laryngoscope 2016;126:1464–9Google Scholar
6Boston, M, Horlbeck, D. Humanitarian surgical missions: planning for success. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;153:320–5Google Scholar
7Yeung, J, Javidnia, H, Heley, S, Beauregard, Y, Champagne, S, Bromwich, M. The new age of play audiometry: prospective validation testing of an iPad-based play audiometer. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;42:21Google Scholar
8Rourke, R, Kong, DC, Bromwich, M. Tablet audiometry in Canada's north: a portable and efficient method for hearing screening. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:473–8Google Scholar
9Myburgh, HC, van Zijl, WH, Swanepoel, D, Hellstrom, S, Laurent, C. Otitis media diagnosis for developing countries using tympanic membrane image-analysis. EBioMedicine 2016;5:156–60Google Scholar
10Swanepoel, de W, Clark, JL, Koekemoer, D, Hall, JW 3rd, Krumm, M, Ferrari, DV et al. Telehealth in audiology: the need and potential to reach underserved communities. Int J Audiol 2010;49:195–202Google Scholar
11Internet World Stats. World internet usage and population statistics. In: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm [31 December 2017]Google Scholar
12Obasola, OI, Mabawonku, I, Lagunju, I. A review of e-health interventions for maternal and child health in sub-Sahara Africa. Matern Child Health J 2015;19:1813–24Google Scholar
13Lewis, T, Synowiec, C, Lagomarsino, G, Schweitzer, J. E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:332–40Google Scholar
14Jayawardena, ADL, Kahue, CK, Cummins, S, Netterville, J. Expanding the capacity of otolaryngologists in Kenya through mobile technology. OTO Open. Epub 2018 March 26Google Scholar
15Kelly, EA, Stadler, ME, Nelson, S, Runge, CL, Friedland, DR. Tablet-based screening for hearing loss: feasibility of testing in nonspecialty locations. Otol Neurotol 2015;39:410–16Google Scholar
16Smart Diagnostic Devices. Smart Tone Automatic Audiometer with SmartMove Cloud Free, and D-Check. In: https://www.smartdiagnosticdevices.com/product/smart-tone-automatic-audiometer-smartmove-cloud-d-check/ [27 April 2018]Google Scholar
17Bateman, C. Little-used medical technology could help thousands see, hear and feel better. S Afr Med J 2015;105:334–6Google Scholar
18Mulwafu, W, Kuper, H, Viste, A, Goplen, FK. Feasibility and acceptability of training community health workers in ear and hearing care in Malawi: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016457Google Scholar
19Swanepoel, de W, Hall, JW 3rd. A systematic review of telehealth applications in audiology. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:181–200Google Scholar
20Kuduwave Audiometers. In: https://kuduwave.com/ [27 April 2018]Google Scholar
21Visagie, A, Swanepoel, de W, Eikelboom, RH. Accuracy of remote hearing assessment in a rural community. Telemed J E Health 2015;21:930–7Google Scholar