Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:46:04.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcomes with gold wire and hydroxyapatite partial ossicular replacement prostheses in type 2 tympanoplasty: a preliminary study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2015

H Katilmis ,
M Songu ,
H Aslan ,
Y Ozkul ,
S Basoglu ,
E Kulduk ,
E Eren  and
H Candan
H Katilmis
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
M Songu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
H Aslan
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
Y Ozkul
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
S Basoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
E Kulduk
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
E Eren
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
H Candan
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr M Songu, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey Fax: 00902322431530 E-mail: songumurat@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To compare the hearing results and graft take rates of the recently developed gold wire prosthesis with those of the hydroxyapatite partial ossicular replacement prosthesis in patients with chronic otitis media.

Method:

This retrospective study examined patients who underwent type 2 tympanoplasty with a minimum follow up of one year. The study population consisted of 32 patients in the partial ossicular replacement prosthesis group and 26 patients in the gold wire group. The main outcome measures were the graft success rate and level of hearing improvement. Complications and extrusion rates were also noted.

Results:

The graft take rate was 90.6 per cent for the partial ossicular replacement prosthesis group and 92.3 per cent for the gold wire group (p = 0.848). Pre-operatively, there were no significant differences in the air or bone-conduction thresholds between groups. Post-operatively, the mean hearing gain was 18.5 ± 14.0 dB in the partial ossicular replacement prosthesis group and 16.5 ± 10.6 dB in the gold wire group (p = 0.555). The mean air-conduction thresholds were 26.6 ± 12.4 and 32.6 ± 10.5 dB, respectively (p = 0.027), and the mean bone-conduction thresholds were 9.7 ± 7.0 and 10.4 ± 6.4 dB, respectively (p = 0.687).

Conclusion:

The success and complication rates provided by the gold wire prosthesis seem comparable to those of the hydroxyapatite partial ossicular replacement prosthesis.

Keywords

Ear OssiclesEar, MiddleOtitis MediaTympanoplastyOssicular Prosthesis
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 129 , Issue 2 , February 2015 , pp. 142 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Goode, RL, Nishihara, S. Experimental models of ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:663–75Google Scholar
2Emmet, JR. Biocompatible implants in tympanoplasty. Am J Otol 1989;10:215–9Google Scholar
3Dornhoffer, JL. Hearing results with the Dornhoffer ossicular replacement prostheses. Laryngoscope 1998;108:531–6Google Scholar
4Brackmann, DE, Sheehy, JL, Luxford, WM. TORPs and PORPs in tympanoplasty: a review of 1042 operations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1964;92:32Google Scholar
5Goode, RL. The ideal middle ear prosthesis. In: Huttenbrink, K-B, ed. Middle Ear Mechanics in Research and Otosurgery. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Middle Ear Mechanics and Otosurgery. Dresden: Dresden University of Technology, 1997;169–74Google Scholar
6Hato, N, Stenfelt, S, Goode, RL. Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiol Neurootol 2003;8:140–52Google Scholar
7Katilmis, H, Aslan, H, Basoglu, S, Ekber, A, Ozturkcan, S, Tayfun, MA et al. A new golden wire prosthesis technique between the malleus and stapes: Our preliminary results. Int Adv Otol 2011;7:172–7Google Scholar
8Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186–7Google Scholar
9Pinar, E, Sadullahoglu, K, Calli, C, Oncel, S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:386–90Google Scholar
10Martin, AD, Harner, SG. Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2004;114:61–4Google Scholar
11Nikolaou, A, Bourikas, Z, Maltas, V, Aidonis, A. Ossiculoplasty with the use of autografts and synthetic prosthetic materials: a comparison of results in 165 cases. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:692–4Google Scholar
12Schneider, K, Hagen, R. Are titanium implants superior to gold implants in the tympanic cavity? [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2003;82:486–9Google Scholar
13Gjuric, M, Schageri, S. Gold prosthesis for ossiculoplasty. Am J Otol 1998;19:273–6Google Scholar
14Songu, M, Aslan, A, Unlu, HH, Celik, O. Neural control of eustachian tube function. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1198–202Google Scholar
15Onal, K, Arslanoglu, S, Songu, M, Demiray, U, Demirpehlivan, IA. Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:22–5Google Scholar
16Onal, K, Arslanoglu, S, Oncel, S, Songu, M, Kopar, A, Demiray, U. Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;40:295–9Google Scholar
17Demirpehlivan, IA, Onal, K, Arslanoglu, S, Songu, M, Ciger, E, Can, N. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:471–4Google Scholar
18Gates, GA. Cost-effectiveness considerations in otitis media treatment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114:525–30Google Scholar