Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:04:19.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multivariate analysis of clinical and radiological risk factors for revision endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: can phenotype predict recurrence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2023

Erdem Eren
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Research and Education Hospital, İzmir, Turkey and Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Point Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
Akif İşlek*
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Clinic, Acıbadem Eskişehir Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey
Yaşar Batuhan Bakiş
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, İzmir Atatürk Research and Education Hospital, İzmir, Turkey and Izmir University of Economics, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Point Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
Sedat Altay
Affiliation:
Radiology Clinic, İzmir Atatürk Research and Education Hospital, İzmir, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Akif İşlek; Email: drakifislek@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to analyse clinical and radiological features (phenotypes) to predict revision risk after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Method

Phenotype characteristics of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery were analysed retrospectively.

Results

The rates of asthma, aspirin sensitivity, smoking and a positive prick test result were significantly higher in revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery cases (p < 0.001, 0.001, < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only gender, pre-operative nasal steroid use, pre-operative systemic steroid use, intra-operative systemic steroid use and smoking were significant risk factors for revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery (p = 0.034, 0.001, 0.010, 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). In addition, only eosinophilia and aspirin sensitivity were significant risk factors for multiple revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedures (p = 0.043 and 0.005, odds ratio = 2.4 and 5.2).

Conclusion

Beyond the endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, defining clinical and radiological factors enables a valid prediction of patients at high risk of revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Akif İşlek takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Wu, AW, Ting, JY, Platt, MP, Tierney, HT, Metson, R. Factors affecting time to revision sinus surgery for nasal polyps: a 25-year experience. Laryngoscope 2014;124:293310.1002/lary.24213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, NR, Jafari, A, DeConde, AS. Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: a large database analysis. Laryngoscope 2018;128:31–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, S, Fong, E, Ooi, EH. Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2017;31:248–5510.2500/ajra.2017.31.4446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsaleh, S, Manji, J, Javer, A. Optimization of the surgical field in endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based approach. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2019;19:810.1007/s11882-019-0847-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philpott, C, Hopkins, C, Erskine, S, Kumar, N, Robertson, A, Farboud, A et al. The burden of revision sinonasal surgery in the UK--data from the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e00668010.1136/bmjopen-2014-006680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachert, C, Zhang, N, Cavaliere, C, Weiping, W, Gevaert, E, Krysko, O. Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020;145:725–39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scangas, GA, Wu, AW, Ting, JY, Metson, R, Walgama, E, Shrime, MG et al. Cost utility analysis of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Laryngoscope 2021;131:E263310.1002/lary.28648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, CA, Soler, ZM, Koochakzadeh, S, Desiato, VM, Yoo, F, Nguyen, SA et al. Revision surgery rates in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: meta-analysis of risk factors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:19920710.1002/alr.22487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, GB, Kern, RC, Bernstein, JA, Hae-Sim, P, Peters, AT. Current and future treatments of rhinitis and sinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:1522–3110.1016/j.jaip.2020.01.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonstam, K, Swanson, BN, Mannent, LP, Cardell, LO, Tian, N, Wang, Y et al. Dupilumab reduces local type 2 pro-inflammatory biomarkers in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Allergy 2019;74:743–5210.1111/all.13685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, B, Liu, F, Zhang, J, Liu, Y, Du, J, Liu, S et al. Multivariate analysis of inflammatory endotypes in recurrent nasal polyposis in a Chinese population. Rhinology 2018;56:216–2610.4193/Rhin17.240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musy, PY, Kountakis, SE. Anatomic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2004;25:418–2210.1016/j.amjoto.2004.06.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benkhatar, H, Khettab, I, Sultanik, P, Laccourreye, O, Bonfils, P. Frontal sinus revision rate after nasal polyposis surgery including frontal recess clearance and middle turbinectomy: a long-term analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018;45:740–610.1016/j.anl.2017.11.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, CL, Lee, TJ, Huang, CC, Chang, PH, Fu, CH. Clinical predictors of revision surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis within 5-year follow-up. Am J Otolaryngol 2020;41:10265410.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajwani, A, Manji, J, Finkelstein-Kulka, A, Habib, AR, Alsaleh, S, Macias-Valle, L et al. A retrospective review of six hundred and nineteen cases to determine the prevalence and factors associated with revision endoscopic sinus surgery in AFRS vs non-AFRS patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43:700–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koskinen, A, Salo, R, Huhtala, H, Myller, J, Rautiainen, M, Kääriäinen, J et al. Factors affecting revision rate of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2016;1:9610510.1002/lio2.27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fokkens, WJ, Lund, VJ, Mullol, J, Bachert, C, Alobid, I, Baroody, F et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012;50:112Google ScholarPubMed
Lund, VJ, Mackay, IS. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 1993;31:183–4Google ScholarPubMed
Georgalas, C, Videler, W, Freling, N, Fokkens, W. Global Osteitis Scoring Scale and chronic rhinosinusitis: a marker of revision surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:455–6110.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02218.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fokkens, WJ, Lund, VJ, Hopkins, C, Hellings, PW, Kern, R, Reitsma, S et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology 2020;58:1464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adelman, J, McLean, C, Shaigany, K, Krouse, JH. The role of surgery in management of Samter's triad. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:220–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damask, CC, Ryan, MW, Casale, TB, Castro, M, Franzese, CB, Lee, SE et al. Targeted molecular therapies in allergy and rhinology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021;164:S12110.1177/0194599820965233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yorgancioğlu, A, Kalayci, O, Kalyoncu, AF, Khaltaev, N, Bousquet, J. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma update (ARIA 2008). The Turkish perspective [in Turkish]. Tuberk Toraks 2008;56:224–31Google ScholarPubMed
Langdon, C, Mullol, J. Nasal polyps in patients with asthma: prevalence, impact, and management challenges. J Asthma Allergy 2016;9:4553Google ScholarPubMed
Nakayama, T, Yoshikawa, M, Asaka, D, Okushi, T, Matsuwaki, Y, Otori, N et al. Mucosal eosinophilia and recurrence of nasal polyps - new classification of chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 2011;49:392–610.4193/Rhino10.261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlaminck, S, Vauterin, T, Lerut, B. The importance of local eosinophilia in the surgical outcome of chronic rhinosinusitis: a 3-year prospective observational study. Clin Transl Allergy 2013;3:O12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virkkula, P, Penttilä, E, Vento, SI, Myller, J, Koskinen, A, Hammarén-Malmi, S et al. Assessing cut-off points of eosinophils, nasal polyp, and Lund-Mackay scores to predict surgery in nasal polyposis: a real-world study. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2020;11:215265672095659CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, CA, Soler, ZM, Desiato, VM, Koochakzadeh, S, Yoo, F, Storck, KA et al. Factors impacting revision surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:289302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayer, K, Hamidovic, S, Besser, G, Mueller, CA, Liu, DT. Factors associated with revision sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Pers Med 2022;12:16710.3390/jpm12020167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachert, C, Bhattacharyya, N, Desrosiers, M, Khan, AH. Burden of disease in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Asthma Allergy 2021;14:127–3410.2147/JAA.S290424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L, Zhang, Y, Gao, Y, Wang, K, Lou, H, Meng, Y et al. Long-term outcomes of different endoscopic sinus surgery in recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma. Rhinology 2020;58:126–35Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, KA, Orlandi, RR, Oakley, G, Meeks, H, Curtin, K, Alt, JA. Long-term revision rates for endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019;9:402–810.1002/alr.22264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masterson, L, Tanweer, F, Bueser, T, Leong, P. Extensive endoscopic sinus surgery: does this reduce the revision rate for nasal polyposis? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:1557–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Younis, RT, Ahmed, J. Predicting revision sinus surgery in allergic fungal and eosinophilic mucin chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2017;127:596310.1002/lary.26248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baban, MIA, Mirza, B, Castelnuovo, P. Radiological and endoscopic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:1003–1210.1007/s00276-020-02427-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed