Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:43:46.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moffett's muted mules: the science of laryngology in the art of war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2018

V Sekhar*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
E Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
H A Elhassan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
N Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Vimal Sekhar, Westmead Hospital, Australia E-mail: vsek183@gmail.com Fax: +61 2 9680 8822

Abstract

Background

Mules and other equine species have been used in warfare for thousands of years to transport goods and supplies. Mules are known for ‘braying’, which is disadvantageous in warfare operations. This article explores the fascinating development of surgical techniques to stop military mules from braying, with particular emphasis on the key role played by the otolaryngologist Arthur James Moffett in devoicing the mules of the second Chindit expedition of World War II.

Method

The PubMed database (1900–2017) and Google search engine were used to identify articles related to devoicing mules in the medical and veterinary literature, along with information and images on the Chindit expedition.

Results

This paper reviews the surgical techniques aimed at treating braying in mules, ranging from ventriculectomy and arytenoidectomy to Moffett's approach of vocal cordectomy.

Conclusion

Moffett's technique of vocal cordectomy provided a quick, reproducible and safe solution for devoicing mules. It proved to be advantageous on the battlefield and demonstrated his achievements outside the field of medicine.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr V Sekhar takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Spartacus Educational. Horses and Mules. In: http://spartacus-educational.com/FWWhorses.htm [12 January 2018]Google Scholar
2US Government. Special Forces Use of Pack Animals. In: https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-05-213.pdf [18 October 2017]Google Scholar
3Browning, DG. Vocalization of Equus asinus: the hees and haws of donkey brays. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:2485Google Scholar
4Moffett, AJ. The silent Chindit mules. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983;287:1946–7Google Scholar
5Henning, H. Taking the bray out of the army mule. Popular Science 1918:82Google Scholar
6Cramp, P, Barakazai, SZ. Surgical management of recurrent laryngeal neuropathy. Equine Vet Educ 2012;24:307–21Google Scholar
7Speirs, V. Laryngeal surgery – 150 years on. Equine Vet J 1987;19:377–83Google Scholar
8Johnson, JH, Garner, Harold E. Complications in equine laryngeal surgery. Vet Surg 1975;4:57–9Google Scholar
9Dollar, JAW. The army roaring experiments. J Comp Pathol 1890;3:106–11Google Scholar
10Belknap, JK, Derksen, FJ, Nickels, FA, Stick, JA, Robinson, NE. Failure of subtotal arytenoidectomy to improve upper airway flow mechanics in exercising standardbreds with induced laryngeal hemiplegia. Am J Vet Res 1990;51:1481–7Google Scholar
11Möller, VDH. The Laryngeal Whistling of the Horses (Hemiplegia laryngis) and its Operative Treatment [in German]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1888Google Scholar
12Curing roaring in horses. Mount Ida Chronicle and St Bathans Weekly News 1910 July 29: 1Google Scholar
13Hobday, F. Specimens of equine larynx, and records of cases illustrating the results of the “ventricle-stripping” operation for the relief of the conditions known as “whistling” and “roaring” in horses. Demonstrations of instruments specially designed for this operation. Proc R Soc Med 1911;4:8792Google Scholar
14Stewart, CM. The muting of animals of General Wingate's force operating behind the Japanese lines in Burma. J R Army Vet Corps 1946;17:8792Google Scholar
15Phillips, R. The operation of muting or vocalis chordectomy in the mule. J R Army Vet Corps 1959;31:42–5Google Scholar
16Imperial War Museum (UK). A Chindit column crossing a river in Burma. In: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205194375 [13 November 2017]Google Scholar
17The 1st Chindit Expedition, Operation Longcloth, 1943. In: http://www.chindits.info/Longcloth/Main.htm [9 April 2017]Google Scholar
18Benjamin, E, Wong, DK, Choa, D. Moffett's solution: a review of the evidence and scientific basis for the topical preparation of the nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:582–7Google Scholar
19Max, W. Obituaries. Br Med J 1996;312:505Google Scholar
20American Mule Museum. History of the Mule. In: http://www.mulemuseum.org/history-of-the-mule.html [19 July 2017]Google Scholar