Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T05:49:04.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microfractures of the otic capsule

The possible role of masticatory stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. W. Proops ,
W. M. Hawke  and
G. Berger
D. W. Proops*
Affiliation:
Consultant, ENT Surgeon, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, U.K.
W. M. Hawke
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Toronto. Director, Temporal Bone Histopathology Laboratory.
G. Berger
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Toronto and St. Joseph's Health Centre.
*
David W. Proops, B.D.S., F.R.C.S., Consultant ENT Surgeon, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microfractures of the temporal bone have been recognized for more than seventy years and occur in certain well-defined areas of the otic capsule. The etiology and significance of these microfractures has been debated since their discovery. The most commonly held theory is that they result from stresses within the otic capsule that develop with growth. An alternative explanation might be that they result from masticatory stress placed upon the temporal bone.

Fifty serially-sectioned temporal bones from the Ontario Temporal Bone Bank were examined in this study for the presence of microfractures. Our findings as to the most common sites of microfractures agree with previous studies.

It is proposed that the constant stress placed upon the petrous temporal bone by the act of mastication is directed by the anatomy of the external, middle and inner ear through certain definite pathways, including the Fallopian canal, the bony semicircular canals and the cochlea. The most common sites of these fractures represent sites of weakness in the path of these directed forces within the otic capsule, and the statistically significant increase in the number of fractures with age lends support to the masticatory stress theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 100 , Issue 7 , July 1986 , pp. 749 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbenel, J. C. (1972) The biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint. A theoretical study. Journal of Biomechanics, 5: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, H. O. (1969) Head injury, audiological and vestibular findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endo, B. (1970) Analysis of stresses around the orbit due to masseter and temporalis muscle respectively. Journal of Anthropology Society Nippon, 78: 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, T., Sando, I. and Myers, E. N. (1981) Microfissures in the oval window area. Annals of Otology, 90: 174–180.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawke, M., Farkashidy, J. and Jahn, A. (1973) Processing and staining for light microscopic examination of the temporal bone. Canadian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2: 143–150.Google Scholar
Hekneby, M. (1974) The load of the temporomandibular joint: physical calculations and analyses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 31: 303–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hylander, W. L. (1979) An experimental analysis of the temporomandibular joint reaction force in Macaques. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51: 433–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hylander, W. L. and Bays, R. (1979) An in vivo strain gauge analysis of the squamosal-dentary joint reaction force during mastication and incisal biting in macaca mulatta and macaca fasicularis. Archives of Oral Biology, 24: 689–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kragt, G., Ten Bosch, J. J. and Borsboom, P. C. F. (1979) Measurement of bone displacement in a macerated human skull induced by orthodontic forces. A holographic study. Journal of Biomechanics, 12: 905–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, J. R. and Lehman, R. H. (1969) Histopathology of the temporal bone in advanced Paget's disease. Laryngoscope, 79: 213–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, O. (1930) Uber die Enstehung der Spontanfrakturen der Labyrinthkapsel und ihre Bedeintung fur die Otosklerose. Zeitschrift für Hals-nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, 26: 261–279.Google Scholar
Mayer, O. (1933) Die Ursache der Knochenneubildung bie der Otosklerose. Acta Otolaryngologica, 15: 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noether, J. E. (1967) Elements of non parametric statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Okano, Y., Myers, E. N. and Dickson, D. R. (1977) Microfissures between the round window niche and posterior canal ampulla. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 86: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlman, H. B. (1939) Process of healing in injuries to capsule of labyrinth. Archives of Otolaryngology, 29: 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roydhouse, R. H. (1955) The temporomandibular joint: upward force of the condyles on the cranium. Journal of American Dental Association, 50: 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuknecht, H. F. (1969) Mechanisms of inner ear injury from blows to the head. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 239–252.Google Scholar
Ward, P. H. (1969) The histopathology of auditory and vestibular findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmaack, K. (1932) Zur dritten Otosklerose-Hypothese Otto-Mayers. Archiv Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlopfheilkdunde, 131: 180–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar