Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:28:00.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiences in academic publication among ENT trainees in the UK: results from a national survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2021

S Shahidi ,
M S Osborne ,
G M Jama ,
S Bola  and
J Murphy
S Shahidi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
M S Osborne
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
G M Jama
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
S Bola
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
J Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Shayan Shahidi, Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton Road, WolverhamptonWV10 0QP, UK E-mail: shayan.shahidi@nhs.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to provide an objective means of identifying patterns in academic publication among ENT trainees during their higher surgical training.

Method

A cross-sectional survey was distributed to ENT higher surgical trainees.

Results

A total of 153 ENT specialty trainees participated, giving a response rate of 46.5 per cent. Across all years of training, the mean number of first author publications was three and the mean number of non-first author publications was two. For trainees at specialty trainee year 8 level, these figures were nine and five, respectively. Participants with doctoral degrees and those in academic programmes published more papers but the mean difference was only significant for the doctoral subgroup (p < 0.0001). Those with additional undergraduate degrees and those in less than full-time training had an overall lower number of publications.

Conclusion

Participants in the current survey achieved a higher average number of academic publications than is presently required to successfully complete higher surgical training in ENT. It is hoped that these results act as a guide for trainees planning the research component of their training to ensure that they remain competitive at consultant interview.

Keywords

Surveys And QuestionnairesOtolaryngology
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 135 , Issue 5 , May 2021 , pp. 396 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr S Shahidi takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Nepogodiev, D, Adisa, A, Abantanga, FA, Ademuyiwa, A, Chakrabortee, S, Ghosh, D et al. Delphi prioritization and development of global surgery guidelines for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2020;107:970–7Google Scholar
Filho, IA. Research in clinical and experimental surgery. Adv Res Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;9:45–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhangu, A, Lawani, I, Ng-Kamstra, JS, Wang, Y, Chan, A, Futaba, K et al. Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg 2020;107:1097–103Google Scholar
The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Good surgical practice — professional standards. In: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/gsp/ [6 July 2020]Google Scholar
The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Surgical innovation, new techniques and technologies. In: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/good-practice-guides/surgical-innovation/ [6 July 2020]Google Scholar
Archer, JE, Odeh, A, Ereidge, S, Salem, HK, Jones, GP, Gardner, A et al. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet 2020;396:27–38Google Scholar
The Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum: Educating the surgeons of the future – otolaryngology. In: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Core_Surgery_MASTER_2017.pdf_71498859.pdf [6 July 2020]Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Surgical Training. Certification guidelines & checklists – JCST. In: https://www.jcst.org/quality-assurance/certification-guidelines-and-checklists/#otolaryngology [17 May 2020]Google Scholar
Kelley, K, Clark, B, Brown, V, Sitzia, J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:261–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, D, Sankar, V, Hughes, JP, Jones, A, Fenton, JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolaryngological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:253–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, DH, Edelmayer, LW, Fenton, JE. A century of citation classics in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery journals revisited. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1358–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed