Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T04:16:42.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ENT emergency clinic: a prospective audit to improve effectiveness of an established service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2008

S Mylvaganam*
Affiliation:
Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
R Patodi
Affiliation:
Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
J B Campbell
Affiliation:
Heart of England NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Senthurun Mylvaganam, 29 York Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 9HY, UK. E-mail: seni@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Background:

Ear, nose and throat emergency clinic services vary greatly between trusts. Their common aim is to enable acute conditions to be seen quickly and effectively within an optimum environment. There is however no ‘gold standard’ for service.

Objectives:

To identify an efficient model of service, and to determine whether introduction of a referral and appointment based system improves patient waiting times and appropriateness of referrals.

Methods:

A prospective audit, comprising: an initial survey to appraise the existing service; telephone surveys of eight trusts in the West Midlands to determine variability of ENT emergency clinic services and to identify components of an effective service; and re-audit following implementation of a verbal referral and appointment based service.

Results:

The new service significantly reduced patient waiting times, from 70 minutes to 35 minutes (t = 6.776; p < 0.01), with an associated reduction in the variability of waiting times. Inappropriate referrals were reduced from 7 to 2 per cent. These results were achieved when a 72 per cent referrer compliance with the service was observed.

Conclusions:

A verbal referral and appointment based system improves patient waiting times and appropriateness of referrals. Maintenance of high referrer compliance with such a system should be considered, and a tool for monitoring referring practitioners is suggested. This clinic construct model is offered as an example in order to aid delivery of an effective ENT emergency service in departments with similar patient demand and staff resources.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Wheatley, AH, Temple, RH, Camilleri, AE, Jones, PH. ENT open access clinic: an audit of a new service. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:657–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2O'Driscoll, K, Donnelly, MJ, McShane, DP, Burns, H. An audit of the ENT casualty service at the Royal Victoria Hospital. Ir J Med Sci 1993;162:462–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Agrawal, R, Hampal, S, Flood, LM. The open access ENT casualty service. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:719–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Bleach, N, Mady, S, Williamson, P. Emergency workload in otolaryngology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994;75:335–8Google Scholar
5Ali Raza, S, Denholm, SW, Wong, JCH. An audit of the management of acute otitis externa in an ENT casualty clinic. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:130–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hobson, JC, Khemani, S, Singh, A. Prospective audit of the quality of ENT emergency clinic notes before and after introduction of a computerised template. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:264–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed