Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:02:49.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of pre-operative computed tomography evaluation of the tympanic cavity for hearing improvement after stapes surgery for tympanosclerosis with stapes fixation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2015

S Kikkawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Otolaryngology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
K Kubo
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
H Kawano
Affiliation:
Kawano Ear Nose and Throat Surgical Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan
S Komune
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
*
Address for correspondence: Sayaka Kikkawa, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Fax: +81 92 6425685 E-mail: saya_kik@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract

Objective:

Our aim was to determine if stapes surgery is useful for treating inflammatory ear diseases.

Materials and methods:

Thirteen patients underwent single-stage or staged surgery for stapes fixation due to tympanosclerosis alone or with cholesteatoma. Operative criteria were: no tympanic membrane retraction, perforation or adhesion; middle-ear cavity with aeration >1 year; a fixed stapes. Computed tomography was used to analyse the relation between operative success and pre-operative pneumatisation.

Results:

Success rate at six months was 75 per cent. Hearing results were stable with little deterioration and no complications. Patients with poor pneumatisation had good results (with improved air–bone gap) only after staged surgery. Well-aerated ears heard better even with single-stage surgery.

Conclusions:

Pre-operative computed tomography and intra-operative findings are necessary to determine the pneumatisation status of tympanic mastoid cavities. If criteria approved, poorly pneumatised patients underwent staged surgery. Stapedectomy achieved good hearing results for inflammatory middle-ear disease with stapes fixation.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1House, HP, Hansen, MR, Al Dakhail, AA, House, JW. Stapedectomy versus stapedotomy: comparison of results with long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 2002;112:2046–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Kakigi, A, Takeda, T, Nakatani, H, Kozakura, K, Sawada, S, Nishioka, R et al. Modification of surgical procedures of type 1 tympanoplasty for non-cholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010;71(Suppl 1):71–3Google Scholar
3Vincent, R, Oates, J, Sperling, NM. Stapedotomy for tympanosclerotic stapes fixation: is it safe and efficient? A review of 68 cases. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:866–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Albu, S, Babighian, G, Trabalzini, F. Surgical treatment of tympanosclerosis. Am J Otol 2000;21:631–5Google ScholarPubMed
5Gormley, PK. Stapedectomy in tympanosclerosis: a report of 67 cases. Am J Otol 1987;8:123–30Google ScholarPubMed
6Celik, H, Aslan Felek, S, Islam, A, Safak, MA, Arslan, N, Gocmen, H. Analysis of long-term hearing after tympanosclerosis with total/partial stapedectomy and prosthesis used. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:1308–13Google Scholar
7Yetiser, S, Hidir, Y, Karatas, E, Karapinar, U. Management of tympanosclerosis with ossicular fixation: review and presentation of long-term results of 30 new cases. J Otolaryngol 2007;36:303–8Google Scholar
8Bayazit, YA, Ozer, E, Kara, C, Gökpinar, S, Kanikama, M, Mumbuç, S. An analysis of the single-stage tympanoplasty with over-underlay grafting in tympanosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:211–14Google Scholar