Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T14:40:11.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of age on speech recognition in noise and on contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2007

S T Yılmaz ,
G Sennaroğlu ,
L Sennaroğlu  and
S K Köse
S T Yılmaz*
Affiliation:
Dikimevi Vocational School of Health, Ankara, Turkey
G Sennaroğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey
L Sennaroğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
S K Köse
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Suna Tokgöz Yilmaz, Ankara Üniversitesi Dikimevi Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Tıp Fakültesi Kampüsü, 06590 Dikimevi, Ankara, Turkey. Fax: +90 312 3197884 E-mail: sunatokgoz@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

We aimed to study the influence of age, in normal hearing individuals, on: the masking level difference test, the speech recognition in noise test, the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions test, and the contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression test. We also aimed to research the effect of age when using these tests to evaluate the central auditory nervous system.

Methods:

Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression were measured in all subjects. Subjects also underwent masking level difference and speech recognition in noise tests.

Results:

We found a decrease in transient evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes, speech recognition in noise scores and hearing thresholds with age. We also found that higher masking level difference values were associated with lower speech recognition in noise scores and contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission suppression values.

Conclusion:

We conclude that decreasing speech recognition in noise scores are associated with decreasing contralateral transient evoked otoacoustic emission supression values. This effect may be related to medial efferent system dysfunction.

Keywords

Central Auditory DiseasesAge FactorsCochleaSpeech Acoustics
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 121 , Issue 11 , November 2007 , pp. 1029 - 1034
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Møller, AR. Hearing, Its Physiology and Pathophysiology. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000Google Scholar
2Kemp, DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:1386–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Hall, JW 3rd. Distortion product and transient evoked OAEs: nonpathologic factors influencing measurement. In: Hall, JW3rd, ed.Handbook of Otoacoustic Emissions. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 2000:204–16Google Scholar
4Maison, S, Micheyl, C, Collet, L. The medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: structure and fuction. Scand Audiol 1999;28:78–84Google Scholar
5Veuillet, E, Khalfa, S, Collet, L. Clinical relevance of medial efferent pathways. Scand Audiol 1999;28:53–62Google Scholar
6Jiang, D, McAlpine, D, Palmer, AR. Detectability index measures of binaural masking level difference across populations of inferior colliculus neurons. Neuroscience 1997;17:9331–9Google Scholar
7Olsen, WO, Noffsinger, D, Carhart, R. Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. Audiology 1976;15:287–301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Humes, LE. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:161–7Google ScholarPubMed
9Baran, JA, Musiek, FE. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. In: Musiek, FERintelmann, WF, eds. Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1999;375–413Google Scholar
10Mueller, HG, Bright, KE. Monosyllabic procedures in central testing. In: Katz, J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994:224–6Google Scholar
11Bellis, TJ. Central Auditory Processing Disorders. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1996Google Scholar
12Beattie, RC, Barr, T, Roup, C. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise. Br J Audiol 1997;31:153–64Google Scholar
13de Ceulaer, G, Yperman, M, Daemers, K, van Driessche, K, Somers, T, Offeciers, FE, Govaerts, PJ. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical set-up. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:350–5Google Scholar
14Parthasarathy, TK. Aging and contralateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12:80–5Google Scholar
15Hood, LJ, Berlin, CI, Hurley, A, Cecola, P, Bell, B. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1996;101:113–18Google Scholar
16Schoeny, ZG, Talbott, RE. Nonspeech procedures in central testing. In: Katz, J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994;214–16Google Scholar
17Pichora-Fuller, MK, Schneider, BA. Masking-level differences in older adults: the effect of the masking noise. Perception & Psychophysics 1998;60:1197–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Barrenäs, ML, Wikström, I. The influence of hearing and age on speech recognition scores in noise in audiological patients and in the general population. Ear Hear 2000;21:569–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Quaranta, N, Debole, S, Girolamo, S. Effect of ageing on otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression in humans. Audiology 2001;40:308–18Google Scholar
20Salvi, RJ. Ageing and hearing loss special issue introduction. Audiology 2001;40:283–5Google Scholar
21von Wedel, H, von Wedel, UCH, Streppel, M. Selective hearing in the quiet and in noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991;476:131–5Google Scholar
22Poulsen, T, Keidser, G. Speech recognition in young and elderly normal-hearing listeners in a closed response test. Scand Audiol 1991;20:245–9Google Scholar
23Fışıloğlu, A, Katz, J. The effects of contralateral noise on the perception of pure tones and speech: a study of children with auditory proccessing difficulties and normal controls. XXII International Congress of Audiology, July 3–7, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada 1994.Google Scholar
24Laukli, E, Molde, B, Solem, BS, Stenklev, NC. Hearing in the elderly: a test protocol and preliminary results. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001;52:167–70Google Scholar
25Stenklev, NC, Laukli, E. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in the elderly. Int J Audiol 2003;42:132–9Google Scholar
26Kim, S, Frisina, DR, Frisina, RD. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing. Audiol Neuro Otol 2002;7:348–57Google Scholar
27Castor, X, Veuillet, E, Morgon, A, Collet, L. Influence of aging on active cochlear micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994;15:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Jacobson, M, Kim, S, Romney, J, Zhu, X, Frisina, RD. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1707–13Google Scholar
29Musiek, FE. Otoacoustic emissions and the olivocochlear bundle. The Hearing Journal 1992;45:12–15Google Scholar
30Hood, LJ. A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1745–8Google Scholar
31Aran, MJ, Pajor, AM, de Sauvage, RC, Erre, JP. Role of the efferent medial olivocochlear system in contralateral masking and binaural interactions: an electrophysiological study in guinea pigs. Audiology 2002;39:311–21Google Scholar
32Komazec, Z, Filipovic, D, Milosevic, D. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions – activation of the medial olivocochlear system [in Croatian]. Medicinski Pregled 2003;56:124–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Micheyl, C, Collet, L. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1604–10Google Scholar
34Sahley, TL, Nodar, RH, Musiek, FE. Efferent Auditory System, Structure and Function. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997Google Scholar