Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T22:43:31.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disinfection of flexible fibre-optic endoscopes out-of-hours: confidential telephone survey of ENT units in England – 10 years on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

PD Radford ,
SN Unadkat ,
M Rollin  and
NS Tolley
PD Radford*
Affiliation:
Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK
SN Unadkat
Affiliation:
Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK
M Rollin
Affiliation:
Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK
NS Tolley
Affiliation:
Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr P Radford, Goddards, Hunsdon Rd, Widford SG12 8SE, UK E-mail: peter.radford@doctors.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To audit out-of-hours flexible endoscope disinfection practice in England and compare the findings with a previously published first audit cycle, with the 2005 ENT UK guidelines as the key intervention.

Methods:

A telephone survey of the 104 ENT units in England was conducted out-of-hours, replicating the first cycle. The on-call clinician answered questions concerning access to flexible endoscopes, training, disinfection procedures and record keeping. Information regarding the clinician's trainee grade and their cross-covering duties was also acquired. Responses were compared to the first cycle results and published guidance.

Results:

In total, 72 of the 104 units agreed to participate. The on-call clinician cleaned the flexible endoscope in 43 per cent of units. However, adequate training in disinfection only occurred in a minority of units (37 per cent), though this was an improvement from the first cycle (12 per cent). Furthermore, 27 per cent of units used an inadequate method of disinfection out-of-hours. One confounding factor may be the increase in cross-cover out-of-hours, with 68 per cent of respondents covering one or more other specialties.

Conclusion:

An overall moderate improvement in the safety of out-of-hours endoscopy in the past 10 years cannot obscure the urgent need for universal compliance with national guidelines.

Keywords

EndoscopesDisinfectionOtolaryngology
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 127 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 489 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented as a poster at the British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology, 4–6 July 2012, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

References

1Muscarella, LF. Prevention of disease transmission during flexible laryngoscopy. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:536–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Banfield, GK, Hinton, AE. A national survey of disinfection techniques for flexible nasendoscopes in UK ENT out-patient departments. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:202–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Lubbe, DE, Fagan, JJ. South African survey on disinfection techniques for the flexible nasopharyngoscope. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:811–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Kanagalingam, J, Zainal, A, Georgalas, C, Paun, S, Tolley, NS. The disinfection of flexible fibre-optic nasendoscopes out-of-hours: confidential telephone survey of ENT units in England. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:817–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Guidelines for cleaning fibreoptic laryngoscopes. In: https://entuk.org/docs/prof/publications/full_guidelines_cleaning_fibreoptic_laryngosopes [1 June 2012]Google Scholar
6Swift, AC. Guidance on the decontamination and sterilization of rigid and flexible endoscopes. London: ENT UK, 2010Google Scholar
7Biswas, D, Rafferty, A, Jassar, P. Night emergency cover for ENT in England: a national survey. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:899–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Pothier, DD, Ahluwalia, S, Monteiro, P. Hospital at night? Not for ENT. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:134–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Sharpe, D, Farboud, A, Trinidade, A. 'Is that the ENT SHO?': concerns over training and experience of juniors expected to cross-cover ENT at night. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Tristel's micro-biological efficacy. In: http://www.tristel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Tristel-Wipes-System-Brochure.pdf [18 March 2013]Google Scholar
11Vadrot, C, Darbord, JC. Quantitative evaluation of prion inactivation comparing steam sterilization and chemical sterilants: proposed method for test standardization. J Hosp Infect 2006;64:143–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Street, I, Hamann, J, Harries, M. Audit of nasendoscope disinfection practice. Surgeon 2006;4:11–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed