Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:21:58.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A consideration of the effect of ear canal resonance and hearing loss upon white noise generators for tinnitus retraining therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

David M. Baguley*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Aylesbury, Bucks, UK.
Graham J. Beynon
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, Aylesbury, Bucks, UK.
Frances Thornton
Affiliation:
Department of and Stoke Mandeville Hospital NHS Trust, Aylesbury, Bucks, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr David Baguley, Department of Audiology (box 94), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ. Fax: 01223 217559

Abstract

Tinnitus retraining therapy has been heralded as a major advance in the alleviation of tinnitus perception. A cornerstone of this technique is to use white noise produced by a white noise generator (WNG) over a period of several months in order to assist the patient to habituate to their tinnitus. There are three factors which influence the frequency spectrum of the perceived noise such that the perception of white noise from a WNG is unlikely. These factors are the actual spectrum of the emitted noise, the ear canal resonance of the patient and the hearing sensitivity of the patient.

Advocates of tinnitus retraining therapy state that white noise is the optimal stimulation to assist habituation of tinnitus. This paper demonstrates that this optimal situation is unlikely to be achieved and that this may account for the long periods needed for patients to achieve benefit from the technique. The development of devices that allow for the above factors to be countered is suggested.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coles, R. R. A. (1987) Tinnitus and its management. In ScottBrown's Otolaryngology (Stephens, D., ed), Butterworths, London, pp 368414.Google Scholar
Coles, R. R. A. (1995) Models of tinnitus: Generation, perception: clinical implications. In Mechanisms of Tinnitus. (Vernon, J., Moller, A., eds.) Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 1119.Google Scholar
Hazell, J. W. P. (1995) Models of tinnitus: Generation, perception: clinical implications. In Tinnitus Mechanisms. (Vernon, J., Moller, A., eds.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 5772.Google Scholar
Jastreboff, P. J. (1995) Tinnitus as a phantom perception. In Mechanisms of Tinnitus. (Vernon, J. A., Moller, A. R., eds), Allyn and Bacon, Boston pp 7393.Google Scholar
Jastreboff, P. J., Hazell, J. W. P. (1993) A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: clinical implications. British Journal of Audiology 27 (1): 718.Google Scholar
Killion, M. C. (1978) Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: Where is the ‘missing 6 dB’. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (5): 15011509.Google Scholar
Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., Sanders, J. V. (1982) Fundamentals of Acoustics. 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 250.Google Scholar
Kuhn, G. F., Guernsey, R. M. (1983) Sound pressure distribution about the human head and torso. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73 (1): 95105.Google Scholar
Sheldrake, J. B., Coles, R. R. A., Foster, J. R. (1995) Noise generators (‘maskers’) for tinnitus therapy. Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar (Reich, G. E., Vernon, J. A., eds) American Tinnitus Association,Portland, Oregon, USA. pp 351352.Google Scholar
Vernon, J. A. (1987) Assessment of the tinnitus patient. In Tinnitus. (Hazell, J. W. P., ed.) Longman Singapore Publishers Ltd., Singapore pp 7187.Google Scholar
Weiner, F. M. (1946) The pressure distribution in the auditory canal in a progressive sound field. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 18 (2): 401408.Google Scholar