Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:56:21.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of treatment modalities for single-sided deafness in paediatric patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2022

M Kubina Open the ORCID record for M Kubina [Opens in a new window] ,
B Fornwalt ,
S Patel ,
B Sharma  and
A Jeyakumar
M Kubina
Affiliation:
Department of the College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA
B Fornwalt
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Mercy-Bon Secours, Youngstown, USA
S Patel
Affiliation:
Department of the College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA
B Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of the College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA
A Jeyakumar*
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Mercy-Bon Secours, Youngstown, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr A Jeyakumar, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Mercy-Bon Secours, Youngstown 44512, USA E-mail: ajeyakumar@mercy.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Children with single-sided deafness often receive inconsistent clinical recommendations because there is currently no clear best practice in paediatric single-sided deafness. This systematic review of the literature aimed to compare commonly used treatments and attempted to support the use of a particular treatment modality.

Method

This was a comprehensive literature review from 1 January 2000 to 22 February 2022; the study compared the outcomes of bone conduction devices and cochlear implantation in paediatric patients with single-sided deafness.

Results

Fifteen studies consisting of 202 patients were examined. Variables including speech reception in quiet and noise, as well as quality of life measures were compared. Both cochlear implantation and bone-anchored hearing aids demonstrated benefits in sound perception. Quality of life measures improved with both modalities.

Conclusion

Although both bone-anchored hearing aids and cochlear implantation appear to provide significant improvements, additional research with more direct comparisons is needed to provide more decisive results.

Keywords

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralBAHACochlear ImplantsHearing LossHearing Aids
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 137 , Issue 7 , July 2023 , pp. 725 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr A Jeyakumar takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery annual virtual meeting, 13–15 September 2020.

References

Dewyer, NA, Smith, S, Herrmann, B, Reinshagen, KL, Lee, DJ. Pediatric single-sided deafness: a review of prevalence, radiologic findings, and cochlear implant candidacy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021;131:233–810.1177/00034894211019519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, JP, Neumann, K, Dazert, S, Voelter, C. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:496–50310.1097/MAO.0000000000001343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deep, NL, Gordon, SA, Shapiro, WH, Waltzman, SB, Roland, JT, Friedmann, DR. Cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness. Laryngoscope 2020;131:58–69Google ScholarPubMed
Cushing, SL, Gordon, KA, Sokolov, M, Papaioannou, V, Polonenko, M, Papsin, BC. Etiology and therapy indication for cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness. HNO 2019;67:750–910.1007/s00106-019-00729-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Premarket approval (PMA). In: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma.cfm?id=P000025S104 [15 June 2020]Google Scholar
della Volpe, A, Ippolito, V, Roccamatisi, D, Garofalo, S, De Lucia, A, Gambacorta, V et al. Does unilateral hearing loss impair working memory? an Italian clinical study comparing patients with and without hearing aids. Front Neurosci 2020;14:90510.3389/fnins.2020.00905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrmann-Mueller, D, Kurz, A, Kuehn, H, Rak, K, Mlynski, R, Hagen, R et al. Usefulness of cochlear implantation in children with single sided deafness. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2020;130:10980810.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109808CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeitler, DM, Sladen, DP, DeJong, MD, Torres, JH, Dorman, MF, Carlson, ML. Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2019;118:128–3310.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos Macías, Á, Borkoski-Barreiro, SA, Falcón González, JC, de Miguel Martínez, I, Ramos de Miguel, Á. Single-sided deafness and cochlear implantation in congenital and acquired hearing loss in children. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;44:138–4310.1111/coa.13245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, L, Richter, GT, Dornhoffer, JL. Update on bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136:17510.1001/archoto.2009.203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, L, Dornhoffer, JL. Bone-anchored hearing aids for unilateral hearing loss in teenagers. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1120–210.1097/MAO.0b013e31818af398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangen, A, Dierckx, A, Boudewyns, A, Dhooge, I, Offeciers, E, Wouters, J et al. Longitudinal linguistic outcomes of toddlers with congenital single-sided deafness—six with and twelve without cochlear implant and nineteen normal hearing peers. Clin Otolaryngol 2019;44:671–610.1111/coa.13347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, RL, Aschendorff, A, Hassepaß, F, Wesarg, T, Kröger, S, Jakob, TF et al. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital unilateral deafness: a case series. Otology Neurotol 2017;38:570–610.1097/MAO.0000000000001597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Távora-Vieira, D, Rajan, GP. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital unilateral deafness: mid-term follow-up outcomes. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016;133:12–1410.1016/j.anorl.2016.04.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arndt, S, Prosse, S, Laszig, R, Wesarg, T, Aschendorff, A, Hassepass, F. Cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness: Does aetiology and duration of deafness matter? Audiol Neurotol 2015;20:21–3010.1159/000380744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassepass, F, Aschendorff, A, Wesarg, T, Kröger, S, Laszig, R, Beck, RL et al. Unilateral deafness in children. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:53–6010.1097/MAO.0b013e31827850f0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Stadio, A, Dipietro, L, Toffano, R, Burgio, F, De Lucia, A, Ippolito, V et al. Working memory function in children with single side deafness using a bone-anchored hearing implant: a case-control study. Audiol Neurotol 2018;23:238–4410.1159/000493722CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doshi, J, Banga, R, Child, A, Lawrence, R, Reid, A, Proops, D et al. Quality-of-life outcomes after bone-anchored hearing device surgery in children with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:100–310.1097/MAO.0b013e318277a3ddCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arndt, S, Aschendorff, A, Laszig, R, Beck, R, Schild, C, Kroeger, S et al. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:39–4710.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patton, MH, Blundon, JA, Zakharenko, SS. Rejuvenation of plasticity in the brain: opening the critical period. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019;54:83–910.1016/j.conb.2018.09.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ismail, FY, Fatemi, A, Johnston, MV. Cerebral plasticity: windows of opportunity in the developing brain. Eur J Paediatric Neurol 2017;21:23–4810.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devi, N, Chatni, S, Ramadevi, KJ, Baba Fakruddin, D. Comparison of performance of transcranial contralateral routing of signal, pre-implanted trimmer digital and digital bone anchored hearing aid in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Audiol Res 2015;5:13310.4081/audiores.2015.133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed